datalink7: The reason there wasn't any real substance behind my post was the whole point of my post. I thought that was clear, but apparently it wasn't.
I was mirroring your posting because, yes it's true, you
don't have any substance. Saying "everyone hates themselves" because "I know the truth", and taking 5 paragraphs to say it, isn't substance.
M: I understand that. The problem arises out of the fact that while you make the assumption that I have no substance you are incorrect so you can't mirror me by intentionally having no substance. I do not claim 'no substance' so there is nothing parallel or reflective in you stance. It only appears to be a mirror to you. You can't take my substance from me just because you can't see it.
d: You also apparently enjoy making a large amount of assumptions.
Again, the assumptions are yours. I told you that you can't see what I say and then you want to tell me I don't say anything. Hehe. I know. I can't say anything to you. You are deaf to it.
---------------------
M: "If you didn't hate yourself so much you wouldn't feel this need to argue."
d: Where would you get a notion like that? Debating is a healthy exercise as it allows you to either grow in your own beliefs through further validation, or see contradiction and change your beliefs for better. Because I want to do this I hate myself? Sorry, you're wrong and that's a fact.
M: This is how the situation appears to you. You can't understand where I get the notion because you don't have the experience to acquire it. It is out there in lala land for you. I don't doubt you think and see just as you described. Didn't I, however, mention you don't know what you feel. You aren't going to know a deeper truth about your motives without such knowledge. Having had my own similar naiveté ripped away, I know what you feel better than you do. Trust me, however, I know you don't believe that.
------------------
M: "But you get all upset at the notion I know more than you."
d: First, I'm not upset. Getting upset about arguments on the Internet isn't something I normally do unless I am really passionate about the subject. Actually, I don't really get upset all that often in life. Generally speaking I am calm almost all of the time. Yet another assumption wrong. I'm not upset.
M: You have the notion that you are a single 'I' or ego when in fact you are many, a fragmented mess, as it were.
If you are upset one time there is something wrong some inner conflict going on. And I addressed this subject to soldiers who have to face tremendous challenges to their psychic stability. Circumstances force them to face and feel feelings normal people much more successfully bury. The intensity of war and the soldiers youth are double whammies. I stand against your denial for them. We need to stop the bull shit game that we are OK. We are a mess and the world is dying and it's because we hate ourselves. This isn't personal and against you. You only typify a normal response and I am responding as I can.
d: And I don't know how much you know compared to how much I know. Maybe you do know, on aggregate, more than me. However, I do know that I don't' hate myself, so you are wrong about that. In this, there is at least one thing that I know more than you.
M: I don't know much and it doesn't matter. I know what you think you know, but you could be split open like a watermelon with the right circumstances. I know you believe as you do and I know you are being as honest as you can. I don't find any fault. I just know you don't know what I do, or what you feel.
-----------
M: "You are in love with your status quo."
d: If the status quo is good what's wrong with that? But I wouldn't say I'm "in love" with it. Actually, I'm not even really sure what you are referring too... my beliefs? My lifestyel? What I like to eat? Maybe qualify your statement?
M: I simply mean you are happier to stay with the known then entertain any notion you don't know what you feel.
---------------
M: "The notion that you have work to do on yourself upsets you"
d: No it doesn't. I'm not upset. Stop assuming I am. Or don't stop assuming. But if you want to grow yourself making less assumptions and trying to actually learn the truth would help you. But you haven't proven that you actually want to grow. You seem content to live in your little bubble of "I'm right you're wrong." Your loss in the end.
M: I learned the truth about me. We are the same. I know it and you don't. My bubble includes all of humanity.
-----------
M: "You aren't perfect and complete."
d: Never said I was.
M: Didn't say it because I thought you did
--------------
M: "Oh, by the way, study mankind's great depository of wisdom, mythology. See the stories of quests where the prize is gotten after a descent into hell."
d: I do read mythology when I can. Recently re-read The Odyssey. So many things to read though. You can find lessons in more writings than just mythology. But I'm always opened to suggestions if you have a particular piece of liturature that I should add to my collection of things to read.
M: See below
---------------
M: "Why do people experience survivor's guilt? Why do people knock on wood? Why do people experience panic attacks or never allow themselves to relax?"
d: I think it would depend on the individual. Each persons experience is different and having one solution to all of life's problems is more than highly improbably. It might even border on hurtful to try to help someone by convincing themselves that they hate themselves, only to find that wasn't the problem at all.
But I haven't devoted a lot of time to this topic so I don't know the answer, if there is one. Besides, knocking on wood, while silly, isn't exactly a horrible behavior.
M: Survivor's guilt isn't horrible behavior either. It is not a mater of that. All I was saying is that if people hate themselves and are the only survivors imagine the cognitive dissonance. Somebody who is worthless is the one who should have died. Why did good people die instead of a worthless shit like me. One simple explanation but it will have millions of variations. You know Occam's razor, yes?
d: You say I haven't offered any answers. I didn't come in here to give answers. I came in here to answer your theory. You say that everyone hates themselves. I don't. Ergo, your theory is wrong. Sorry, but that's just the way it is.
M: I came here to give answers. You came to deny mine. I said not only that people hate themselves, but that they don't know it and don't want to know it. You completely conform to my analysis so rather than proving me wrong, you demonstrate that I am right.
d: You can now either take that knowledge and attempt to grow. Or you can shove it away and creep further into your hole. One way leads to further englightenment. And no, it isn't discarding what I said. The choice is yours.
M: Because I know, I have no choice but to know.
==============
I went to see if there was some easy way to get into myth and I found this that I will do in a new post: