• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

More Clinton Investigations

fskimospy said:
It's almost as if these investigations into Clinton aren't genuine and are some sort of political maneuver!
Click to expand...

There's probably some Russian intervention as some level. When is there not? That's world away from there being a quid pro quo in any legitimate sense. Trump could be executed for treason if the standard of guilt was that low on just what we know.

As Kelly says "it's an empty barrel".
 
Hayabusa Rider said:
There's probably some Russian intervention as some level. When is there not? That's world away from there being a quid pro quo in any legitimate sense. Trump could be executed for treason if the standard of guilt was that low on just what we know.

As Kelly says "it's an empty barrel".
Click to expand...

Investigating the FBI over how they investigated Clinton’s email server that was the investigated during the 8 or so investigations into the Benghazi attack has to be one of the most disgustingly naked displays of partisanship over good governance I have seen in a very long time. They should be ashamed of themselves.

The only thing more shameful so far is the media’s credulous treatment of it considering Gowdy is on the record calling these investigations a sham.
 
fskimospy said:
Investigating the FBI over how they investigated Clinton’s email server that was the investigated during the 8 or so investigations into the Benghazi attack has to be one of the most disgustingly naked displays of partisanship over good governance I have seen in a very long time. They should be ashamed of themselves.

The only thing more shameful so far is the media’s credulous treatment of it considering Gowdy is on the record calling these investigations a sham.
Click to expand...

Yep, for sure.
 
Yup, any minute now. Wait for it . . .

I for one appreciate these endless investigations as an excellent way to keep Congress from doing any real harm. It's like dangling car keys in front of a baby with a hand grenade. Grab the shiny keys, not the pin.
 
werepossum said:
Yup, any minute now. Wait for it . . .

I for one appreciate these endless investigations as an excellent way to keep Congress from doing any real harm. It's like dangling car keys in front of a baby with a hand grenade. Grab the shiny keys, not the pin.
Click to expand...
Except in this case, it's the GOP shaking shiny keys in front of their base. Really more like a shiny fishing lure.
 
Zorba said:
Except in this case, it's the GOP shaking shiny keys in front of their base. Really more like a shiny fishing lure.
Click to expand...

Their distraction tactics are so obvious. Keep the Clintons in the crosshairs to remind them to keep linking her to elected Democrats for the next 7 years. Like the search for the Holy Grail, the Ark, and Bigfoot.

We're still waiting for the Niger investigation to kick off, of course...
 
I'd complain about them wasting time, but I don't think the time of a moron like Devin Nunes actually has any value.

Looking forward to their inevitable investigation into PizzaGate and other Infowars/Fox News conspiracy theories.
 
Decades after both Bill and Hillary are dead the GOP is still going to be launching new investigations about them. It's a brand builder.
 
It's understandable why Congress is concerned. When they opened the container that was sealed 70 years ago they found half the Uranium 232 was missing.

Clinton probably gave it to the Russians.
GHnapSz.gif
 
fskimospy said:
It's almost as if these investigations into Clinton aren't genuine and are some sort of political maneuver!
Click to expand...

"Although there is evidence of potential violations regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case". I guess that is how you summarize "matters".
 
brandonbull said:
"Although there is evidence of potential violations regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case". I guess that is how you summarize "matters".
Click to expand...

What did that have to do with Benghazi?
 
ivwshane said:
Exactly! Your dumbass is so easily mislead that you didn't even know her email "scandal" was apart of the Benghazi investigation.
When you are talking about her emails you are talking about Benghazi.
Click to expand...

I guess with that line of thinking, which is not relevant to the context of my reply, we could run this back to the Nixon investigation since we are talking about Hillary and she worked on the Nixon investigation. So now we just reopened the case against Nixon?? What??
 
werepossum said:
Yup, any minute now. Wait for it . . .

I for one appreciate these endless investigations as an excellent way to keep Congress from doing any real harm. It's like dangling car keys in front of a baby with a hand grenade. Grab the shiny keys, not the pin.
Click to expand...

Or: any real good,
 
brandonbull said:
You should stop at the point where people think you are an idiot instead of your "here hold my beer while I'll show you what kind of next level imbecile I am" obsession.
Click to expand...

See, now you are projecting.


Don't get mad at me, I'm not the dumbass that didn't know that Hillary's emails are directly related to the Benghazi investigations. I'm not the one doubling down on that ignorance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top