"it is not so" is about as an elaborate answer as I can give to yours without making numerous assumptions about what or how you think, assumptions I am not prepared to make.
I think I answered your other response with the post just above this one.
I think I answered your other response with the post just above this one.
ffmcobalt / nik -
Explain to me the bias of scientists.
Anthropologists, Biologists, Geologists, Chemists, Physicists, etc, since they all helped form our modern Evolutionary Theory.
The dream of every scientist is to prove the other dude wrong. Then he gets published and famous and respected.
Scientists do not make up some big brother organization. There is no "pope" of all scientists. They like to argue. A lot. They're geeks and nerds.
An aside:
Someone explain Homo sapiens neandertalensis if there is no evolution (or Homo neandertalensis if you want to give them a seperate species designation), Homo erectus, Homo habilis, Homo ergaster, Australopithecus afarensis, Australopithecus africanus, Homo heidelbergensis, etc.
Explain to me the bias of scientists.
Anthropologists, Biologists, Geologists, Chemists, Physicists, etc, since they all helped form our modern Evolutionary Theory.
The dream of every scientist is to prove the other dude wrong. Then he gets published and famous and respected.
Scientists do not make up some big brother organization. There is no "pope" of all scientists. They like to argue. A lot. They're geeks and nerds.
An aside:
Someone explain Homo sapiens neandertalensis if there is no evolution (or Homo neandertalensis if you want to give them a seperate species designation), Homo erectus, Homo habilis, Homo ergaster, Australopithecus afarensis, Australopithecus africanus, Homo heidelbergensis, etc.
Originally posted by: ffmcobalt
And hearing the actual voice of the One who created it all is even less subjective.
nik
Vouched and accounted for by you, and you alone.
If one has the megalomaniacal tendencies to believe that his or her experience alone is enough to prove or disprove a creator to any other person, I pity them.
Originally posted by: Zakath15
Originally posted by: ffmcobalt
And hearing the actual voice of the One who created it all is even less subjective.
nik
Vouched and accounted for by you, and you alone.
If one has the megalomaniacal tendencies to believe that his or her experience alone is enough to prove or disprove a creator to any other person, I pity them.
Yes, because I'm the only one who He "talks to"
Don't read the Bible, much, do you.
nik
which theories suggest the popping aspect?
nik/ffmcobalt -
Is there proof that Unicorns, Vishnu, and vampires don't exist?
Precisely, and furthermore, how do you know it's God "talking to your heart" and not Satan. God says Satan takes people captive at his will. The only sure thing is the Word of God. Get this through your head, experience is faulty and subjective. Christianity is not a feel good, or feeling based religion, feelings are deceptive and can't be trusted.
nik/ffmcobalt -
Do you understand what bias is?
A group of one million competing scientists are not biased when all they want to do is find explanations for the natural world. If they were all working together on the same project in unison, yes, there could be bias. But they're not. Not even close.
All Christians are biased as well.
Do you understand what bias is?
A group of one million competing scientists are not biased when all they want to do is find explanations for the natural world. If they were all working together on the same project in unison, yes, there could be bias. But they're not. Not even close.
All Christians are biased as well.
Nope. There isn't proof that anything doesn't exist. It's not possible to prove that anything doesn't exist because you can't be everywhere at once to look to see if they exist. It was once thought that Blue Whales were extinct. But, a number of years after they were first thought to be, a few were found again. I dunno if they're extinct, now, but I don't really care. It provides a great little addition to debates like these.
Granted, I don't believe that any of those things exist, but I don't go spouting off and bashing those who do simply because I have a closed mind
nik
I say that all of you are my slaves all though none of you know it. The only sure thing is the word of me.
prove me wrong
It's called "confirmation"
I'll leave you to your own research since you seem to be shacking up with those who blatantly refuse to have an open mind or simply leave sh|t alone.
nik
Everyone is bias, Zod. Every single person.
You can't get away from it and it will never change.
nik
I've obviously come to that conclusion. One thought that went through my mind many years ago was: if all it took was a hundred years to advance so explosively, there is simply no possible way that modern man is hundreds of thousands of years old. Even 5 thousand years seems like a long time.
Certainly!
This specimen is characterized by large brain size, a forehead that rises sharply, eyebrow ridges that are very small, a prominent chin, and lighter bone structure than most other homonids. The trend towards smaller teeth and a flatter face is also evident.
Because of these features, this specimen would be characterized as Homo sapiens.
specimen representation can be found at
Andre
The popping aspect theories. I forget the technical term at the moment. I've both read them and seen them numerous times in Scientific magazines and on Science shows respectively.
Granted, I don't believe that any of those things exist, but I don't go spouting off and bashing those who do simply because I have a closed mind
I never once bashed God. I could care less if he/she/it existed. Doesn't concern me in the slightest.
You guys were the ones who had the problem with the scientific Theory of Evolution.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 22K
-
News NVIDIA and Intel to Develop AI Infrastructure and Personal Computing Products- Started by poke01
- Replies: 384
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
Facebook
Twitter