If your talking about the legislation in general this is obviously wildly untrue.The American People have received bupkiss from the bailouts. That's the problem. They would not have been harmed if the Democrats refused to support the bailouts.
$600 extra in unemployment benefits per week for example is truly a big deal for those on the bottom of the economic ladder in terms of their economic situations in many cases. (Even if there are problems with implementation in some states.) The fact unemployment was extended to also covers gig workers is a big deal and impacts allot of low wager workers who had gig jobs with Uber and Lyft and the like. Even in states where there have been problems with the implementation, the extra money generally should be coming soon.
The $1200 stimulus is also more significant for those lower on the economic ladder in terms of its impact. The Democrats even got that implemented so it gets phased out and eliminated completely for those in upper income categories. (The fact it was a flat amount as opposed to something like based on a percentage of last year's income or something should be viewed as a a victory for a more progressive policy.) Even with the issues with the details of who it applied to and the like, it still made a difference for allot of Americans and at least in many cases is reaching people relatively quickly. There are other policies which could be viewed as being progressive included in the bill, along with some which at least did keep more Americans employed.
The underlying reality is particularly the policies I mentioned made a big difference for allot of Americans and the idea that if Congressional gridlock had caused nothing to get passed by now that would not have harmed allot of Americans by now is plainly utterly ridiculous. (We're talking about people literally homeless or about to be evicted in much greater numbers than may be the case right now and literally starving in the streets if nothing had been done.)
You can certainly argue whether Democrats should have held out for more in earlier negotiations, but if you are claiming there would have been no consequences if nothing had been passed by now you are not vaguely in touch with reality.
Last edited: