Ah, I get it now. I was a little confused in the Chicago black firefighters thread, but now I see that classy is like a charicature of a black guy. He's for affirmative action, he's hyper-masculine, he thinks homosexuality is immoral and he's terribly insecure. Got it.
I am not hyper masculine. Why do people insist on thinking folks like me who don't support homosexuality are some how afraid or insecure about our own sexuality. Its foolish thinking. The lifestyles we accept do have an impact on us all. I have stated numerous times, that while I have my opinion on this subject, I don't believe my opinion is absolute. It is shaped by the way I see the world and life in general and so is everyone else's.
If we accept gay marriage as a society we have to accept all of it. It will no longer be a choice for couples such as me to show displeasure as to curriculum in school. The gay movement has already tried to force organizations like The Boy Scouts to accept leaders who are gay, despite the fact they believe in teaching young boys to grow up as men. To say that the sexuality of a man is not defined by who the man has sex with is completely hogwash.
Now some may say what is the problem we did the same thing for blacks and civil rights. But I contend there is no morality in a person's skin color or their ethinicity. The base argument always is well its not a choice. If your moral base believes in a certain sexual manner in which a person conducts themselves then it is a choice. Adultery is a sin, despite some will say they can't help it. And that argument runs deep for many different fronts.
I have a moral base where I believe certain things. I don't smoke and don't allow it in my house. I don't drink. I even filter the entire internet in my home so my kid doesn't view certain things. Does that mean she'll grow up perfect or won't be exposed to those things or even do those things? The answer is no. But as a parent it is still my job to teach her and provide the enviroment where she can learn those lessons that I believe will help her live the life I believe she ought to live. Then when she is old enough, then she will have to accept or reject those things where she sees fit.
I truly don't care what a person does in his or her own home. But if I give my support despite the fact it may violate my own conscience as to what I believe is right, then I am lying to myself. We are going through some things right now where a certain person has done something rather awful and is projecting a really bad image right now. I have refused this person to see my kid since this all happened. Why? If I don't filter who she has contact with, I can't complain when she turns around and does those same things.
We are influenced by what we see, hear, and experience. This is how we learn. So to say someone's sexuality can't be influenced by being those who engage in certain sexual activities is a lie. Our entire psychy is influenced by who we hang around. This is why messed up parents and homes turn out messed up kids. I believe in working with people no matter how they live their personal life. But I don't believe in adopting or allowing things I believe that are contrary to my moral center to run through my house like a parade either. Me and my wife have been married a long time. She still has not met some of my family because I know how they think. And because of that I don't want their negative influence projected on to her.
This is not just a decision on where to go for lunch. This is decision that will affect everyone on a personal basis on some level. But I refuse to buy this profound argument that a person's sexuality is not learned. And a person sexual appetities does majorly influence their personality. In short you can do what you want, but don't blame and crucify everyone else who doesn't agree. Being a prostitute or being in polygamous marriage really never hurt anyone outside of those engaged directly. But I don't wanna hang up posters and have a march supporting them either. I got a lot of flaws, but I do have resolve on certain things.