If I had to guess, it would be because most of those other songs are pretty straight forward in their misogyny while this song is an example of the sort of behavior that people don't think about being problematic but actually is. This song can be read as him trying to coerce her into having sex with him by refusing her assistance getting home in dangerous weather.
That is a kind of weird way to think about this. To me this says our lives are so great that we can focus on these relatively minor things. It sounds to me that the people that are really fucked are the ones that still have to deal with being mutilated.
I have to say, this thread has had a lot less discussion of time travel than I had hoped for.
They had to travel back in time to impose 2018 standards on 1940s people.. Sort of like that guy that just got sliced and diced for trying to bring Jesus to the heathens on that island..
Here's another one. They're going after the girl on Little House.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/26/books/laura-ingalls-wilder-book-award.html
Prestigious Laura Ingalls Wilder Award Renamed Over Racial Insensitivity
The American Library Association is dropping Laura Ingalls Wilder’s name from a prestigious children’s literature award in order to distance the honor from what it described as culturally insensitive portrayals in her books.
The decision was made out of a desire to reconcile the award with the organization’s values of “inclusiveness, integrity and respect,” representatives of the association
said in a statement on Monday. The award is given out by its children’s division.
“Wilder’s books are a product of her life experiences and perspective as a settler in America’s 1800s,” the association’s president, Jim Neal, and the president of the children’s division, Nina Lindsay, said in the statement. “Her works reflect dated cultural attitudes toward Indigenous people and people of color that contradict modern acceptance, celebration, and understanding of diverse communities.”
Ms. Wilder’s books, particularly the “Little House” series based on her childhood in a settler family, have remained popular since they were first published in the 1930s and 1940s. A hit television show based on the series, “Little House on the Prairie,” helped to reignite interest and usher in a new generation of fans in the late 1970s and early 1980s.
The name change was a result of months of consideration and was approved over the weekend by the board of the Association for Library Service to Children, a division of the library association. The honor, formerly the Laura Ingalls Wilder Award, is now named the Children’s Literature Legacy Award.
The award, distributed to just 23 people over more than six decades, recognizes authors and illustrators whose books have created a lasting contribution to children’s literature.
Wilder herself received the first award in 1954,
three years before her death in 1957. It was initially distributed every five years, but its frequency has steadily increased. Since 2016, it has been given annually.
Other
winners include the authors Beverly Cleary; Theodor S. Geisel, also known as Dr. Seuss; and E. B. White. This year’s winner,
announced in February, was Jacqueline Woodson, the author of “Brown Girl Dreaming” and other books. Despite their popularity, Ms. Wilder’s books contain jarringly prejudicial portrayals of Native Americans and African Americans.
In the 1935 book “Little House on the Prairie,” for example, multiple characters espoused versions of the view that “the only good Indian was a dead Indian.” In one scene, a character describes Native Americans as “wild animals” undeserving of the land they lived on.
“Little Town on the Prairie,” published in 1941, included a description of a minstrel show with “five black-faced men in raggedy-taggedy uniforms” alongside a jolting illustration of the scene.
“There’s this subtle but very clear fear generated throughout the books,” said Debbie Reese, a scholar whose writing and research focus on portrayals of American Indians in children’s literature.
Dr. Reese, who belongs to the Nambe Pueblo tribe in New Mexico, said that the books could be used to educate high school or college students, but were inappropriate for young children.
“People are trying to use them and say, ‘Well, we can explain them,’ and I say: ‘O.K., you’re trying to explain racism to white people. Good for those white kids,’” she said. “But what about the Native and the black kids in the classroom who have to bear with the moment when they’re being denigrated for the benefit of the white kids?”
The American Library Association said that the name change was aimed only at aligning the award with its values, not at limiting access to Wilder’s books. “Updating the award’s name should not be construed as censorship, as we are not demanding that anyone stop reading Wilder’s books, talking about them, or making them available to children,” Mr. Neal and Ms. Lindsay said in the statement. “We hope adults think critically about Wilder’s books and the discussions that can take place around them.”
In recommending that the organization move away from using Wilder’s name for the award, a
task force for the children’s division noted last month that the books had been both “deeply meaningful” to some readers and “deeply painful” to others. “Both of these things are true,” it said in a written recommendation, adding that such a move would not demand “that anyone change their personal relationship with or feelings about Wilder’s books.” The task force also said that the books, and Wilder herself, were products of her era and reflected the mostly mainstream perspective of a white woman at the time.
Facebook
Twitter