Originally posted by: Xavier434
Originally posted by: lupi
Originally posted by: Xavier434
Originally posted by: JD50
He already said where he got the list from, scroll up.
I saw that. I wanted to read it and I wanted to see proof that Obama agreed with every word of it rather than just portions of it.
Look, the bottom line here is that lupi doesn't even have kids IIRC. What the hell does he know about this sort of thing? I have a kid in KG and have no problem teaching him things which involve being aware where other people are not allowed to touch him. His mother and I started teaching him that at the age of 3 and it was perfectly fine. We are responsible enough to do that for our kid but we can't control what other parents do or do not do as well as when they choose to do it. Many wait too long. I am glad the schools are trying to make up for their slack. There is nothing about this stuff which is harmful.
It is always hilarious when people come on these boards making all sorts of tough talk about parenting and kids when they have zero first hand experience. They are like teenagers that think they know everything and what is even worse is that some of you just eat it up as if they are experts on the matter.
I see this post is full of fail and lack of knowledge. As I recall it's you whom doesn't have a kid as you married some chick that had gotten knocked up by someone else and complain that the actual father doesn't pay you enough for getting involved in that situation.
No wonder Cosby gets so much flak from the type posting in this thread, why worry about personal responsibility when you can have bumper to bumper legislative cover. Guess they are wasted their time talking about economic reform and rebuiling industry is the standard citizen is going to be treated as one who would have difficulty getting a job watching the counter at 7-11.
Have you read the bill before speaking about ? Did you notice that the revised purposes match extremely well with those from that sex ed insitute. Did you know their program has 6 sections with 4 tiers for age level. Did you notice that the specific areas of interest in the bill are also written with a striking similarity of those 6 areas. About the only thing that bill doesn't include is the specific guideline topics per age group, many of the tier 1 I pasted earlier, and instead simply leaves the well defined never possible to be loopholed "age appropriate" statement.
But continue to come along and make statements regarding people posting on things they don't know about, or for a more general understanding, posting
present.
Sigh... I have been my stepson's daily father figure since he was 1 and he is now in kindergarden. In regards to his real father, he has a court order to pay child support and he doesn't do it like so many others. I don't want him to pay me. I want him to pay for the expenses of his son as ordered by our court of law....or do you not believe in our court system? Do you believe he is above the law? I can understand if you disagree with the law but there is a difference between that and people being allowed to act above those laws.
On a less personal note, you can complain about personal responsibility all you want but the bottom line is that people are not being personally responsible about this matter now even without the schools teaching this stuff in the way that bill describes. So, by having it in schools, we really haven't changed anything other than ensuring that the kids get taught the info that they need. There is nothing wrong with that.
I have said it before and I will say it again. The government cannot change how personally responsible the people are for better or for worse. In this case, adding this stuff in the schools is not going to stop any parents who are already responsible enough to teach it to their kids. As a parent who is in regular contact with many other parents, I guarantee it.
While I am just one guy with one opinion. At least I am a responsible parent with that opinion, unlike Lupi who is just here yapping away with zero real life experience on this matter.
