Originally posted by: ProfJohn
No, you need to understand what really built America.Originally posted by: dahunan
Nah.. the most embarrassing part is that he goes on to basically defend slavery ... 🙂Originally posted by: Vic
And as usual, PJ replies only to the weakest and most off-topic post in the thread, as opposed to those that directly refuted his comments in the OP.
It was not slave labor, if that was true then Brazil would be far richer since they got a LOT more slaves than we did.
Slavery sucked and was a horrible stain on our history, but it is in no way shape or form responsible for the greatness that America has achieved.
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
No, you need to understand what really built America.Originally posted by: dahunan
Nah.. the most embarrassing part is that he goes on to basically defend slavery ... 🙂Originally posted by: Vic
And as usual, PJ replies only to the weakest and most off-topic post in the thread, as opposed to those that directly refuted his comments in the OP.
It was not slave labor, if that was true then Brazil would be far richer since they got a LOT more slaves than we did.
Slavery sucked and was a horrible stain on our history, but it is in no way shape or form responsible for the greatness that America has achieved.
Way to ignore my post.
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: cwjerome
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Patriotism is a disease. [... ]
Patriotism is neither good nor bad, it just is. You ought to qualify it with some context when issuing your moral pronouncements... otherwise it's just more anti-conceptual blather for your celebrated Desiderata.
Patriotism just is? Patriotism has the very psychological roots I said it does. It may be, however, that because you can't see that you are forced to assume it just is. The context I was speaking in is obviously that defined by McCain. I would say also that it you who is the conceptual thinker. I'm talking about things I know.