Originally posted by: meltdown75
This is the table in the article:
"Survey Says..."
CPU - 2.0 - 2.3ghz (made by Intel) - (pretty useless to include this info IMHO since survey results almost 50/50)
RAM - 256-512MB
Video - Radeon 9800 series
OS - Windows XP
Net connection - 256Mb/s
Display Res: 1024 x 768, 16-bit
Preferred Optical: DVD-ROM
Free HD space - 10-20GB
Total HD Space - 70-80GB
Given these specs, do you consider your particular setup 'higher' or 'lower' than average? Yes I am bored![]()
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: meltdown75
Display Res: 1024 x 768, 16-bit
The majority of Steam users are colourblind morons.
- M4H
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: meltdown75
Display Res: 1024 x 768, 16-bit
The majority of Steam users are colourblind morons.
- M4H
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Higher - and you'll note that most of my spec's are LOWER
Athlon XP1900, No OC
R9600 Pro
WinXP
768mb
4mbit intarweb
1280x960x32@62hz
8 different opticals
Free HD Space: 20mb (I sh!t you not)
Total HD Space: 600gb
Originally posted by: Dopefiend
Higher in all but my 9600 Pro, which, I might add, runs CS:S and HL2 at 1024x768x32 at a comfortable 60fps (no AA/AF, sadly).