- Dec 29, 2002
- 7,402
- 0
- 71
Currently 7% rating on RottenTomatoes. Only 15 reviews so far, but still definitely not good news.
Originally posted by: wankawitz
Currently 7% rating on RottenTomatoes. Only 15 reviews so far, but still definitely not good news.
Originally posted by: Spartan Niner
Originally posted by: wankawitz
Currently 7% rating on RottenTomatoes. Only 15 reviews so far, but still definitely not good news.
64% community rating however. Might be fun to watch as a mindless violent action flick.
Originally posted by: Kromis
Originally posted by: Spartan Niner
Originally posted by: wankawitz
Currently 7% rating on RottenTomatoes. Only 15 reviews so far, but still definitely not good news.
64% community rating however. Might be fun to watch as a mindless violent action flick.
The only good "mindless violent action flick" is one that is rated R (e.g. Rambo)![]()
Originally posted by: Spartan Niner
Well FWIW one of the critics lumped Max Payne into the same category as Die Hard 4 and said that both movies sucked, so personally I think they're mostly full of shit.
Originally posted by: Slick5150
Originally posted by: Linux23
PG-13. LOL.
Supposedly they only trimmed 6 seconds of footage from what they originally had in order to get the PG-13 rating, so its not like they changed a lot.
But if what remains is still awful, then it doesn't make any difference whether its R or PG-13.
Originally posted by: MmmSkyscraper
Originally posted by: Spartan Niner
Well FWIW one of the critics lumped Max Payne into the same category as Die Hard 4 and said that both movies sucked, so personally I think they're mostly full of shit.
Die Hard 4 was terrible though.
Max Payne is a dumb film with a great conceptual hook from a director who visualizes better than he dramatizes. Given all the missed opportunities and just plain dumb turns of the script, it should be simply awful, yet the resonance of the mythic imagery and potential of the premise creates a fascinating film in the margins of the pulp story in the foreground. And the very movement of the film, which flows not so much narratively as visually, carried forward on the wings of its demon visions, creates an existence that hovers above the literal turns the story eventually takes. Moore?s paintbrush, dipped into the colors of the night, creates a vivid fantasy noir world that moves with a pulp grace that can carry you through all the absurdities simply by its imagery and momentum.
Originally posted by: Mardeth
My movie taste sucks apparently. Maybe it was the visuals that saved the movie for me...
Maybe somebody decided the movie was already so convoluted and leaden that throwing in a few swooping, screeching valkyries could only help. They do not.
They didn't change themes at all. There's only one reference to "angels and demons" and it's one character's opinion. The rest is definitely still Norse.Originally posted by: Chiller2
I like the casting choice but don't like the fact that it went from a Norse religion theme in the game to standerd Christian demons and angels theme like Constatine and End of Days and other movies
