Matt Gaetz ethics report to be released

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

JD50

Lifer
Sep 4, 2005
11,918
2,883
136
Whenever debt service reaches 25% of the budget seems like it would be the kick off point. Though that's more than half a guess.
I've looked into it a little, and the information is as usual polarized. In it's simplest form, inflation is a wonderful method of paying off old debt. The Germans cracked that code after WW2. Wasn't much fun for the general population, but worked out well for the country.
Sometimes debt is a sensible and necessary option, but a never ending pile of debt will absolutely have repercussions. Those repercussions can be mitigated by using an advanced management system called "kicking the can down the road", but like everything else, it has limitations.
If you actually cared about this you'd stop voting for Republicans who cut taxes for the richest people on the planet and balloon the deficit even more.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,934
55,283
136
If you actually cared about this you'd stop voting for Republicans who cut taxes for the richest people on the planet and balloon the deficit even more.
Interestingly enough the guy he supports and voted for presided over the running up of 40% of all US debt accumulated in the entirety of US history up to that point.

It's very hard to take conservatives seriously on debt simply because of their own actions. GHWB was the last Republican who gave even the slightest shit about it.
 

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
22,226
6,428
136
So Japan has a debt/GDP ratio of over 200% and is right around this 25% mark you refer to, however inflation there is very low and has been for years. How do you explain this?

Also while I agree the debate is polarized it should be noted that one of those poles has been...well... correct.
So Japan is paying out 25% of their budget as debt service?
 

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,613
11,255
136
I showed my kids a picture of me from about 1990.
They said "Are those the same clothes as you are wearing now?!"
I said "No! thats a similar black jeans, dark tee shirt and red lumberjack shirt combo but I probably cant fit into those exact jeans now!"
I showed my wife and daughter my 8th grade yearbook picture the other day and my wife said "Holy crap, you still have that polo!" Yes, yes I do.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,276
32,769
136
Whenever debt service reaches 25% of the budget seems like it would be the kick off point. Though that's more than half a guess.
I've looked into it a little, and the information is as usual polarized. In it's simplest form, inflation is a wonderful method of paying off old debt. The Germans cracked that code after WW2. Wasn't much fun for the general population, but worked out well for the country.
Sometimes debt is a sensible and necessary option, but a never ending pile of debt will absolutely have repercussions. Those repercussions can be mitigated by using an advanced management system called "kicking the can down the road", but like everything else, it has limitations.
I bet you never looked up the fact Trump increased the deficit by 50% even before Covid spending yet you still bought into his bullshit. Why? Tax cuts for the rich which did nothing for the economy.

Thanks for contributing to the demise of the country.
 
Last edited:

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
22,226
6,428
136
I bet you never looked up the fact Trump increased the deficit by 50% even before Covid spending yet you still bought into his bullshit. Why? Tax cuts for the rich which did nothing for the economy.

Thanks for contributing to the demise of the country.
Trumps year on year deficit increase for all 4 years is 14.6%. Biden's is 23.3% for the first 3 years.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: iRONic

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,342
19,489
146
Trumps year on year deficit increase for all 4 years is 14.6%. Biden's is 23.3% for the first 3 years.

Either you're incapable of understanding your link, or you're lying. You do know Trump was president in 2020, right?

Screenshot 2024-12-20 064100.jpg
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,934
55,283
136
Either you're incapable of understanding your link, or you're lying. You do know Trump was president in 2020, right?

View attachment 113506
Not only was Trump president in 2020 but the appropriations budget for FY21 was Trump's as well.

@Greenman this is some serious self-ownage. By your own link the guy you support is way worse on debt and deficits. If this is an issue for you why would you support Trump?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,934
55,283
136
Guess I'll have to hope for the best.
It's a genuine question - if you think deficits and debt are bad and will lead to some sort of currency crisis why support the guy who literally added more to the debt than any president in history?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,934
55,283
136
A consistent problem for people trying to "analyze" Trump term 1 results as not bad is that they think it only lasted three years.
It is amazing how hard Republicans have worked to convince America that Trump wasn't president in 2020.

I remember during the election Trump was running ads purporting to show how bad things would be if Harris was president... by showing rioting that happened while Trump was president.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,342
19,489
146
A consistent problem for people trying to "analyze" Trump term 1 results as not bad is that they think it only lasted three years.

And let's not forget that the US monetary supply more than doubled in 2020. The Trump admin literally printed money to try and cover COVID losses and that was a primary cause of subsequent inflation.

Stop simping for the idiot, Green.

Screenshot 2024-12-20 070229.jpg
 

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
22,226
6,428
136
It's a genuine question - if you think deficits and debt are bad and will lead to some sort of currency crisis why support the guy who literally added more to the debt than any president in history?
I absolutely believe huge deficits are an issue, and Trumps history on that issue is concerning to me. That has to be weighed against other issues in terms of support. Illegal immigration is a problem, I don't approve of importing a peasant class. Inflation is another issue, and I understand that deficit spending can increase inflation. Stepping into regional conflicts and generally being the worlds piggy bank is another issue.
I still believe that we'll be better off with Trump than Harris. An opinion that's clearly in the majority. If I'm wrong then I'm wrong, I never claimed infallibility.
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,067
24,395
136
It's a genuine question - if you think deficits and debt are bad and will lead to some sort of currency crisis why support the guy who literally added more to the debt than any president in history?
The answer is simple. He likes the hate. He likes the racism he likes the bigotry he likes the misogyny he likes the owning the libs and he hates government policies that help regular people and people that are poor.

It's as simple as that.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,934
55,283
136
I absolutely believe huge deficits are an issue, and Trumps history on that issue is concerning to me. That has to be weighed against other issues in terms of support. Illegal immigration is a problem, I don't approve of importing a peasant class. Inflation is another issue, and I understand that deficit spending can increase inflation. Stepping into regional conflicts and generally being the worlds piggy bank is another issue.
I still believe that we'll be better off with Trump than Harris. An opinion that's clearly in the majority. If I'm wrong then I'm wrong, I never claimed infallibility.
If you're weighing deficits against other issues that's fine but these are some strange ones to put together. For example Trump's position on deficits, tariffs, and immigration would make inflation much, much worse than anything we've seen. This is not some partisan opinion, it is the overwhelming conclusion of economists from across the spectrum. Also, the US spends something like 0.2% of GDP on foreign aid, much less than almost any other developed country. The 'world's piggy bank' thing is just misinformation.

In short it's hard to take claims of caring about inflation and deficits seriously when you're supporting the guy pledging much higher deficits and higher inflation.
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,364
16,634
146
I absolutely believe huge deficits are an issue, and Trumps history on that issue is concerning to me. That has to be weighed against other issues in terms of support. Illegal immigration is a problem, I don't approve of importing a peasant class. Inflation is another issue, and I understand that deficit spending can increase inflation. Stepping into regional conflicts and generally being the worlds piggy bank is another issue.
I still believe that we'll be better off with Trump than Harris. An opinion that's clearly in the majority. If I'm wrong then I'm wrong, I never claimed infallibility.
I'd love for you to write down, today, what you think the worst possible outcomes would have been with Harris as president. As much detail as possible, include numbers, percentages etc. Then stuff that in a box somewhere and look at it again in 4 years. This is a good way to prevent you from forgiving what trump does in the next 4 by saying 'well it probably would have been worse with Harris anyhow'.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,276
32,769
136
Either you're incapable of understanding your link, or you're lying. You do know Trump was president in 2020, right?

View attachment 113506
Not only was Trump President in 2020, 2016 was Obama. 17, 18, 19 was Trump. 665 to 988 was 50% like I said.

Why didn't @Greenman do his so called research BEFORE voting for Trump? Hoodwinked again or just trying to hasten the demise of the country?

2020, 21 was Covid spending and notice how Biden got it back