Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: hscorpio
Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: hscorpio
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Originally posted by: hscorpioThe fact is no one here knows 100% if this was staged or not.
This part of your post is why I hate the politically correct movement.
I know without a doubt that this was staged. Why? Because I am neither stupid nor gullible. If you think this was real, then you need to own up to being either the former or the latter.
WTF are you talking about? This has absolutely nothing to do with politcal correctness. And you are either intellectually dishonest or a fly that happened to be on the wall when Damon and Kimmel discussed the bit. And what part of "I don't know" confuses you?
You really don't need to be a "fly that happened to be on the wall" to employ basic reasoning, and if you do so you should quickly realize that the probability of it being real is very, very small.
How small exactly? Care to show us your calculations? Also what probability is equivalent to 'without a doubt'?
Let's turn this the other way: What information do you have that suggests it wasn't staged? I know this is a somewhat fallacious argument, but consider first the more than ample evidence that it
was staged:
1) What A-list (assuming he is, not sure) would be the last guest on the show?
2) What show would bring out an actor when they know there are only a few seconds left?
3) The video
showed that there was a running joke about not having enough time for Matt Damon.
4) It was actually aired. This might be a loose argument, but I don't see an actor like Damon having an outburst and then having it aired.
That should be sufficient. Now, back to your evidence. What do you have?
1) He was convincing.
Really? He's an actor! It's almost tautological to suggest that his convincing demonstration was support for the fact that it was real.
So far, I can conclude this about you:
1) You'll likely believe the most improbable scenario despite evidence to the contrary.
2) You'll then use the trite argument, "Nothing is known 100%" to justify your position. Since nothing is known 100% then you're free to hold any position you wish, regardless of how nonsensical it might be.