March 21 2010 Dawn of a New America

[GuitarDaddy]

Threads like these are always so amusing. They show Democrats for the horrible, hateful people they truly are. Their "humanity" extends only far enough to use as a club against anyone they hate.

Why do you hate babies and kill kittens?

 

[CycloWizard]

Ok, and you also must have car insurance in every state in the US. 404 issue not found.

No one is required to purchase auto insurance unless they drive, and even then there are exceptions.

 

[IndyColtsFan]

But it's perfectly fine to force people to pay for wars they don't believe in? Or work jobs with no benifits? LOL@U

Who is "forcing" someone to work a job with no benefits? Please provide links.

 

[2Xtreme21]

Threads like these are always so amusing. They show Democrats for the horrible, hateful people they truly are. Their "humanity" extends only far enough to use as a club against anyone they hate.

Right, we're the ones arguing against a bill that will save thousands of American lives every year. Yup. Truly hateful sons of bitches we are.

 

[MotF Bane]

Right, we're the ones arguing against a bill that will save thousands of American lives every year. Yup. Truly hateful sons of bitches we are.

You're the ones arguing to force people to buy a product, whether they want it or not, and taxing them if they refuse to buy it. Truly hateful you are indeed.

 

[MotF Bane]

Ok, and you also must have car insurance in every state in the US. 404 issue not found.

Apples and oranges. For starters, you don't have to have a car. Secondly, you don't have to have car insurance in all states.

 

[nobodyknows]

Who is "forcing" someone to work a job with no benefits? Please provide links.

The employer is dumb ass. That's the problem with twatheads like you, you think your dog deserves better healthcare then your employees. Of course, you're wrong as usual.

 

[nonlnear]

Who is "forcing" someone to work a job with no benefits? Please provide links.

The employer is you fucking dumb ass dick head. That's the problem with twatheads like you, you think your dog deserves better healthcare then your employees. Go fuck yourself.

Pssst. Abraham Lincoln signed this document a while ago called the Emancipation Proclamation. You should look into it. If you haven't been told how it affects you and your right to leave your employer, you should find a kinder, less slap-happy pimp.

 

[nobodyknows]

Originally Posted by Fear No Evil
Because we have a right to LIFE.. not healthcare.

The irony of your statement escapes you.

LOL

 

[BoberFett]

Why do you hate babies and kill kittens?

Chronic masturbation?

 

[nobodyknows]

Pssst. Abraham Lincoln signed this document a while ago called the Emancipation Proclamation. You should look into it. If you haven't been told how it affects you and your right to leave your employer, you should find a kinder, less slap-happy pimp.

Psst, if you were half as smart as you think you are you would realize that there are plenty of full time crappy jobs that have to be done by somebody that don't have shit for benifits. There are also a lot of self-employed people who for various reasons can't afford health insurance. But don't let the facts get in the way of your smart ass attitude.

By the way, the health bill passed so.... shove it. LOL@U

 

[IndyColtsFan]

The employer is dumb ass. That's the problem with twatheads like you, you think your dog deserves better healthcare then your employees. Of course, you're wrong as usual.

Cool, so you can't provide any links or proof that people are being "forced" to work without benefits. In other words, you are wrong and can't provide a lick of evidence to support your claim. The bonus is that you make a complete ass out of yourself defending your "views."

The original question is below, which I asked you and asked you respectfully. Of course you started in with your usual name calling. Put up or shut up. You are the one that made the statement that people are being "forced" to work without benefits. And now you can't back it up even with the flimsiest shread of evidence, so you resort to name calling.

Originally Posted by blanghorst
Who is "forcing" someone to work a job with no benefits? Please provide links.

Here's a clue -- no one deserves anything and no one is being "forced" to work without benefits. They can leave for other employment which DOES have benefits. Get off your lazy ass and work for it like everyone else instead of expecting handouts. You've been owned so many times that you just need to STFU before you respond to my posts unless you have ACTUAL data to back up your claims.

EDIT: Noticed you edited out the "Go f&@k yourself" comment. LOL, how pathetic. Translation: "Damn, blanghorst owned me -- AGAIN."

 

[CycloWizard]

Psst, if you were half as smart as you think you are you would realize that there are plenty of full time crappy jobs that have to be done by somebody that don't have shit for benifits. There are also a lot of self-employed people who for various reasons can't afford health insurance. But don't let the facts get in the way of your smart ass attitude.

How does this bill help these people afford health insurance?

 

[IndyColtsFan]

Pssst. Abraham Lincoln signed this document a while ago called the Emancipation Proclamation. You should look into it. If you haven't been told how it affects you and your right to leave your employer, you should find a kinder, less slap-happy pimp.

Nobodyknows is on McOwned's level of credibility. He's been owned so many times in this forum that he probably DOES think he is someone's property. :awe:

 

[nonlnear]

Psst, if you were half as smart as you think you are you would realize that there are plenty of full time crappy jobs that have to be done by somebody that don't have shit for benifits. There are also a lot of self-employed people who for various reasons can't afford health insurance. But don't let the facts get in the way of your smart ass attitude.

Is there an argument in there somewhere? All I saw was an incoherent grouping of sentences that have nothing to do with your original claim about people being forced to work at a job with no benefits.

By the way, the health bill passed so.... shove it. LOL@U

Um, what does that have to do with anything you said? Then again I don't know why I would expect coherence from you!

 

[IndyColtsFan]

Is there an argument in there somewhere? All I saw was an incoherent grouping of sentences that have nothing to do with your original claim about people being forced to work at a job with no benefits.
Um, what does that have to do with anything you said? Then again I don't know why I would expect coherence from you!

I have been in enough of these threads with Nobodyknows that I can tell you exactly how it will unfold:

Nobodyknows: Insert ridiculous, unsubstantiated claim
AT P&N Reader: Please provide proof
Nobodyknows: Call reader names and ignore question or make another baseless claim in attempt to divert
AT P&N Reader: Please provide proof
Nobodyknows: Call reader more names and ignore question or make another baseless claim in attempt to divert
AT P&N Reader: Please provide proof
Nobodyknows: Call reader more names and ignore question or make another baseless claim in attempt to divert
AT P&N Reader: Laughs at NK, asks one final time
Nobodyknows: Call reader more names and ignore question or make another baseless claim in attempt to divert
Entire forum: Laughs at Nobodyknows, everyone realizes he has been owned to the max, and people move on.

 

[nobodyknows]

Is there an argument in there somewhere? All I saw was an incoherent grouping of sentences that have nothing to do with your original claim about people being forced to work at a job with no benefits.
Um, what does that have to do with anything you said? Then again I don't know why I would expect coherence from you!

Let me make it simple for you boneheads.

1. Slavery has absolutley nothing to do with an employers moral responsibility to provide healthcare for his employees that want/need it.

2. To suggest that nobody HAS to work a job without decent healthcare benifits is ridculous. Somebody has to do that job and if it's a full time job then he deserves healthcare, the same as anybody else.

I realize those are difficult concepts for pea-brained, snot-nosed kids that only give a rat's ass about themselves, but hopefully somebody who reads this will see the validity in my words.

 

[nobodyknows]

Entire forum: Laughs at Nobodyknows, everyone realizes he has been owned to the max, and people move on.

LOl, so you know what the entire forum is doing? Your mind reading skills are SO impressive. <-That is me LMAO@U

 

[IndyColtsFan]

Let me make it simple for you boneheads.

1. Slavery has absolutley nothing to do with an employers moral responsibility to provide healthcare for his employees that want/need it.

Wrong. An employer has no moral responsibility to provide you anything other than a wage. To increase their competitiveness in the marketplace, many employers offer fringe benefits, of which health insurance is one.

2. To suggest that nobody HAS to work a job without decent healthcare benifits is ridculous. Somebody has to do that job and if it's a full time job then he deserves healthcare, the same as anybody else.

The word is benefits, and no one is being forced to work a job without benefits. You are the one that used the word "forced," not us. Not a single person here said that people are NOT working jobs that have no benefits. We are saying that no one is "forcing" them (your words) to work those jobs. There are jobs out there that don't provide benefits. Fact. There are jobs out there that do provide benefits. Fact. Guess what? Move to another job. No one has a gun to your head (ie, "forcing" you) to work the job with no benefits.

Also as an FYI, there are a lot of high-paying jobs that don't provide benefits (certain consulting jobs). Do they 'deserve' benefits too?

I realize those are difficult concepts for pea-brained, snot-nosed kids that only give a rat's ass about themselves, but hopefully somebody who reads this will see the validity in my words.

Your words have no validity.

 

[nobodyknows]

Wrong. An employer has no moral responsibility to provide you anything other than a wage. To increase their competitiveness in the marketplace, many employers offer fringe benefits, of which health insurance is one.

I guess you haven't heard, Congress agrees with me, not you. But what do I know?? ROFL

Your words have no validity.

Look who's talking. You not only have no validty, you have no brain, no morals, and no compassion. Worthless fucks like you are exactly what is wrong with this country.

 

[nonlnear]

Let me make it simple for you boneheads.

Oh goody. This ought to be good.

1. Slavery has absolutley nothing to do with an employers moral responsibility to provide healthcare for his employees that want/need it.

Wait - what? Moral? So all those self employed people are evil because they decide to create jobs for themselves that don't have benefits? And since when is it a MORAL obligation? Was the entire world the dominion of Satan before the invention of the modern health plan? This claim can be shredded so many ways it's not even funny!

2. To suggest that nobody HAS to work a job without decent healthcare benifits is ridculous. Somebody has to do that job and if it's a full time job then he deserves healthcare, the same as anybody else.

Wait, just because a job exists that means somebody HAS to do it? ROFLMAO - and I really mean ROFL, Mao!

I have a job available: scrubbing my toilets and polishing my nuts. It pays six dollars an hour and has no benefits. Too bad for the oppressed proletariat that somebody HAS to do it. Yep, I am forcing somebody into a life of non-health-care-having slavery because the job MUST be filled. Oh wait, nobody is willing to accept my offer of employment! But, but, but, nobodyknows said that they don't have the right to turn me down. I am the boss after all...

I'm confuzzled.

I realize those are difficult concepts for pea-brained, snot-nosed kids that only give a rat's ass about themselves, but hopefully somebody who reads this will see the validity in my words.

You truly are a crafty troll. Let me assure you that if there is somebody out there who aspires to your level of genius and moral insight, they most certainly will see the "validity" in your words. If, on the other hand, you have no cerebral soul mate, you might find your plane of interweb existence to be a lonely sojourn.

 

[nobodyknows]

How does this bill help these people afford health insurance?

Why are the R's fighting it so hard?

Maybe, just maybe because it's a start down a new path for health care?

 

[IndyColtsFan]

I guess you haven't heard, Congress agrees with me, not you. But what do I know?? ROFL

Nothing at all judging from your posts. That's funny, I thought Congress is requiring individuals to purchase insurance. Hmm, sounds like they DON'T agree with you that companies have a "moral obligation" to provide health care to their employees:






Starting in 2014, most Americans will be required to buy health insurance or pay a penalty.

• The penalty will be phased in, starting at 1 percent of income in 2014, and rising to the maximum of $2,085 for a family in 2016.
• American Indians don&#8217;t have to buy insurance. Those with religious objections or a financial hardship can also avoid the requirement. And if you would pay more than 8 percent of your income for the cheapest available plan, you will not be penalized for failing to buy coverage.
• Those who are exempt, or under 30, can buy a policy that only pays for catastrophic medical costs. It must allow for three primary care visits a year as well.

Companies are not required by law to provide health insurance to their employees. Maybe this quote from the source above will help:

If your employer does not cover you, and you make too much to qualify for Medicaid, you can buy from private insurers through exchanges starting in 2014.

Where is that "moral obligation" for companies to provide insurance for their employees again? Oops, you're wrong -- yet again!

Look who's talking. You not only have no validty, you have no brain, no morals, and no compassion. Worthless fucks like you are exactly what is wrong with this country.

You have no morals or brains. You think it is OK to steal money from others to pay for your needs (there go your morals). You can barely spell and have no logic or deductive reasoning skills, so there does the brain argument. "Worthless fucks" like me have to pay for lazy people like you since you are completely and utterly incapable of providing for yourself and instead like to moan and groan and play the little victim.

People like you, who want to leech off of others, are what is wrong with this country. Your entitlement mentality is sickening. All of your posts can really be reduced to the following argument:

"Waaaah! Waaaah! Gimme, gimme!"

 

[lupi]

I guess you haven't heard, Congress agrees with me, not you. But what do I know?? ROFL

Look who's talking. You not only have no validty, you have no brain, no morals, and no compassion. Worthless fucks like you are exactly what is wrong with this country.

Excellent job in showing how far you can go without getting banned. And the excellent use of facts as your norm also a fine contribution.

 

[nobodyknows]

Wait - what? Moral?

Yes, moral.

Main Entry: 1mor·al
Pronunciation: \&#712;mo&#775;r-&#601;l, &#712;mär-\
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French, from Latin moralis, from mor-, mos custom
Date: 14th century
1 a : of or relating to principles of right and wrong in behavior : ethical <moral judgments> b : expressing or teaching a conception of right behavior <a moral poem> c : conforming to a standard of right behavior d : sanctioned by or operative on one's conscience or ethical judgment <a moral obligation> e : capable of right and wrong action <a moral agent>


You know the thing that keeps all those dirty little unisured people from killing you just fopr shit and giggles..