March 21 2010 Dawn of a New America

[nobodyknows]

Excellent job in showing how far you can go without getting banned. And the excellent use of facts as your norm also a fine contribution.

So you have a point other then just wehining like a little bitch?

 

[nonlnear]

Yes, moral.

Main Entry: 1mor·al
Pronunciation: \ˈmȯr-əl, ˈmär-\
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French, from Latin moralis, from mor-, mos custom
Date: 14th century
1 a : of or relating to principles of right and wrong in behavior : ethical <moral judgments> b : expressing or teaching a conception of right behavior <a moral poem> c : conforming to a standard of right behavior d : sanctioned by or operative on one's conscience or ethical judgment <a moral obligation> e : capable of right and wrong action <a moral agent>


You know the thing that keeps all those dirty little unisured people from killing you just fopr shit and giggles..

But in the 14th century there was no such thing as health coverage. So why would you use a word from that insidiously evil time to represent one of your "moral" ideals?

And congratulations on your insightful reply to the rest of my post. Your silence on the matter is the most intelligent thing you have [not] posted in this entire thread.

 

[IndyColtsFan]

Excellent job in showing how far you can go without getting banned. And the excellent use of facts as your norm also a fine contribution.

But in the 14th century there was no such thing as health coverage. So why would you use a word form that insidiously evil time to represent one of your "moral" ideals?

And congratulations on your insightful reply to the rest of my post. Your silence on the matter is the most intelligent thing you have [not] posted in this entire thread.

Yeah, I think this step in the usual Nobodyknows forum exchange has been reached:

Entire forum: Laughs at Nobodyknows, everyone realizes he has been owned to the max, and people move on.

 

[nick1985]

But in the 14th century there was no such thing as health coverage. So why would you use a word from that insidiously evil time to represent one of your "moral" ideals?

And congratulations on your insightful reply to the rest of my post. Your silence on the matter is the most intelligent thing you have [not] posted in this entire thread.

Scathing, yet accurate. Would read again.

 

[CycloWizard]

Why are the R's fighting it so hard?

Maybe, just maybe because it's a start down a new path for health care?

In other words, you can't answer my question. There's a shocker.

 

[IndyColtsFan]

In other words, you can't answer my question. There's a shocker.

Hmmm, I'm seeing a pattern here with Nobodyknows....

 

[nick1985]

Hmmm, I'm seeing a pattern here with Nobodyknows....

He does that shit all the time. I'll have a reply to some post of his where I make a few points and back them up, then he just ignores them because he knows he's been had.

 

[IndyColtsFan]

He does that shit all the time. I'll have a reply to some post of his where I make a few points and back them up, then he just ignores them because he knows he's been had.

Yes, like the classic thread where he called me a "liar" and then I asked him several times to post my "lie" and a link refuting what I said. After numerous posts where he called me names, etc. he just slithered away as everyone laughed and I kept replying with "Please post proof."

 

[TheSlamma]

Starting in 2014, most Americans will be required to buy health insurance or pay a penalty.

• The penalty will be phased in, starting at 1 percent of income in 2014, and rising to the maximum of $2,085 for a family in 2016.
• American Indians don&#8217;t have to buy insurance. Those with religious objections or a financial hardship can also avoid the requirement. And if you would pay more than 8 percent of your income for the cheapest available plan, you will not be penalized for failing to buy coverage.
• Those who are exempt, or under 30, can buy a policy that only pays for catastrophic medical costs. It must allow for three primary care visits a year as well.

Companies are not required by law to provide health insurance to their employees. Maybe this quote from the source above will help:

If your employer does not cover you, and you make too much to qualify for Medicaid, you can buy from private insurers through exchanges starting in 2014.

Where is that "moral obligation" for companies to provide insurance for their employees again? Oops, you're wrong -- yet again!

there is something there but it's a complete joke.

Employer Mandate:

Employers with more than 50 employees must provide health insurance or pay a fine of $2000 per worker each year if any worker receives federal subsidies to purchase health insurance. Fines applied to entire number of employees minus some allowances.

Cheaper for the employer to take the penalty then to pay for insurance.

 

[MotF Bane]

Stop wasting your time with NK. He's an idiot, it's been proven before.

 

[dmcowen674]

Originally Posted by nobodyknows
I guess you haven't heard, Congress agrees with me, not you. But what do I know?? ROFL

Look who's talking. You not only have no validty, you have no brain, no morals, and no compassion. Worthless fucks like you are exactly what is wrong with this country.
[/QUOTE]

Amazing part is they actually think and believe they are the ones contributing to society when they are the biggest leeches contributing nothing but an Anti-American agenda. Now they are crying like the little babies they are because they are losing their way right now and have to pay along with the rest of us real Americans.

 

[IndyColtsFan]

there is something there but it's a complete joke.

Employer Mandate:

Employers with more than 50 employees must provide health insurance or pay a fine of $2000 per worker each year if any worker receives federal subsidies to purchase health insurance. Fines applied to entire number of employees minus some allowances.

Cheaper for the employer to take the penalty then to pay for insurance.

Exactly. The fine is inconsequential compared to the cost of providing health insurance.

 

[IndyColtsFan]

Amazing part is they actually think and believe they are the ones contributing to society when they are the biggest leeches contributing nothing but an Anti-American agenda. Now they are crying like the little babies they are because they are losing their way right now and have to pay along with the rest of us real Americans.

Wow, you know when McOwned is on your side, you suck. Dave is king of the entitlement-mentality leeches who contribute nothing. Of course, Dave, you got your way (when you voted for Bush) and STILL whined about it.

Back to the thread -- care to tell me exactly what I will be paying for? Care to tell me what I am "leeching" with documented evidence? Careful with your answers.

 

[IndyColtsFan]

Stop wasting your time with NK. He's an idiot, it's been proven before.

Hey, I have to have someone to laugh at until we get back into football season and I can make fun of your Pats. :awe:

 

[nobodyknows]

But in the 14th century there was no such thing as health coverage. So why would you use a word from that insidiously evil time to represent one of your "moral" ideals?

And congratulations on your insightful reply to the rest of my post. Your silence on the matter is the most intelligent thing you have [not] posted in this entire thread.

Then move to the 14th century and you won't have to worry about health care for the working poor. See how easy it is to talk out of your ass?

Some people have no morals, some have no integrity. You obviously have neither and are a waste of air to say nothing of my valuable time. Buh-bye sucker.

 

[nobodyknows]

In other words, you can't answer my question. There's a shocker.

I did answer it dumb ass. It's a start that the R's have fought hard to prevent it, BUT YOU LOSE!!

Is that plain enough for you and your ignoramus friends?? I guess it will have to be because I have no more valuable time to spare on a bunch of whiney ass sore LOSERS. Good day and welcome to my ignore list.

 

[nobodyknows]

He does that shit all the time. I'll have a reply to some post of his where I make a few points and back them up, then he just ignores them because he knows he's been had.

No, I'm just know there is no point in arguing with a fool.

 

[nobodyknows]

Hey, I have to have someone to laugh at until we get back into football season and I can make fun of your Pats. :awe:

I just love pissing off little pricks you. LOSERS!!!!

 

[nonlnear]

Then move to the 14th century and you won't have to worry about health care for the working poor. See how easy it is to talk out of your ass?

Some people have no morals, some have no integrity. You obviously have neither and are a waste of air to say nothing of my valuable time. Buh-bye sucker.

This troll is quite endearing.

 

[nobodyknows]

This troll is quite endearing.

IT TAKES ONE TO KNOW ONE. buwhahaha

 

[nick1985]

My God this man is retarded.

 

[bfdd]

Yeah, but that's not the big news. The 21st was my 25th birthday.

 

[nobodyknows]

My God this man is retarded.

Yeah, apparently mentioning something like "morals" around a circlejerk of tightie righties wasn't a good idea. I guess they don't like to be reminded of what they sold so cheaply??

 

[nick1985]

There's no sense in arguing with someone whose sig just goes to show that they dont understand that some people value state's rights. Scott Brown being for healthcare in MA and being against the federal healthcare isnt a contradiction at all. Again, state's rights. Whats so fucking hard about that to understand?

 

[nonlnear]

Yeah, apparently mentioning something like "morals" around a circlejerk of tightie righties wasn't a good idea. I guess they don't like to be reminded of what they sold so cheaply??

Mentioning it is fine. It's substantiating it that seems to be your problem - among other things.