Man stabs toddler, wife in La. traffic

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

maluckey

Platinum Member
Jan 31, 2003
2,933
0
71
Exactly my point.

Without considering the TOTAL scenario and outcomes, you cannot/should not consider his fate. To either say he should live or die without doing so would be arbitrary at best...reckless at worst.

I for one could not either let him go to prison OR death without seeing ALL sides. Perhaps it's because I tend to be a realist instead of an idealist.
 

imported_dna

Golden Member
Aug 14, 2006
1,755
0
0
Originally posted by: LunarRay
and that everyone has some false feelings locked up inside and depending on just what is in that vault motivates folks to do those and other damnable things..

Well, and for the actions that he took, he must now pay -- the majority of people don't react stabbing their 2-year olds with a kitchen knife.
 

imported_dna

Golden Member
Aug 14, 2006
1,755
0
0
Originally posted by: Orignal Earl
And you've got great company

Here I am talking about one particular case, and you surmise that I agree with every execution that takes place on the face of this planet.

Well done, sir.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
73,156
6,317
126
Lets look at some of the latest points:

Wheezer:

I never said that I was tryng to help any cause...I just think and feel that the bastard deserves a slow painful death considering what he has done.

M: Yes, and as I said that makes you different in what way from the killer who decided the same thing about his wife and child. In other words, who gives a sh!t about what you think you think and feel. We need some assurance your thoughts and feelings are sane, no?

The choices are not scott free or death. There is the option of imprisonment, but when you look at that option, like I said he will come to be able to live with what he did...don't think so? Consider what it takes for someone to stab a 2 year old child to begin with. He will eventually develope a psychological mechanism that allows him to cope and possibly even justify what he did in his own mind....has he learned anything? does he feel remorse? He still gets free room and board, free meals, interaction with human beings, a chance at a better education etc. etc. all the while this child never gets a chance for anything...who knows what that life could have developed into? we'll never know.

M: Yes, and you also have come to live most comfortably with this wish to kill him which I consider to be equally insane. Why get pissed off at him for something you're doing too?


So given the options, with all the benefits that prison has to offer and the fact he learns to live with his actions, yes he will get off scott free in comparison to death.

M: You mean he is going to suffer after he's dead? Where do you acquire this certainty as to what scott free and what isn't. Could it just be a silly opinion?

Some are justified, some are not...this man made a choice...he choose poorly. Choosing poorly means that there are consequences to ones actions. Likewise choosing correctly means there is a reward to ones actions.

M: Leaving aside the silly argument you tried to make that killing in self defense is murder, where do you get this crazy notion that there should be consequences for our actions. There are always consequences of one kind or another, why do you think your notion of what they should be should prevail. Where do you get this ridiculous notion that bad choices should be punished when we are not talking, really, about choices at all. Of course you like to hold people responsible for their actions, call what they do choice, because that frees you to judge then as animals, but in fact they have no more choice in what they do than you do reacting as you do. You are incapable of making the right choice in how you should react, with compassionate understanding, because you are incapable of making that choice, so far. You are a machine just like the killer. You react according to the degree you are conscious.

As much as your heart wants it to be about me and my personal feelings, it is not, it is about right and wrong and the punishment of the wrong choice and that the punishment should be at a minimum equal to the damage of the wrong choice, otherwise lessons are never learned. The topic about the effectiveness of the death penalty is a different matter and for another discussion.

M: You fail, continually, to see that your notions of punishment for wrong choices and eye for an eye revenge are about nothing more than you and your personal feelings. They are a total product of your own invention. They have no reality at all.

And as I have said, punishment is not always just about punishment, it is also about retribution. As it should be.

M: Sorry, but to claim something should be does nothing to prove the case.

maluckey:

This person is likely disturbed, but to what extent? Can he be reformed into a productive member of soceity? Can you make the community where he lives feel safe around him? Can you make the community where it happened feel safe again? Can you convince me 100 percent that he will never do something like this again? Can you somehow balance the loss of innocence of the child and the mother with what he took away from them?

Answer all these questions and THEN think about how he should be dealt with.

M: Make an argument. This is just emotional appeal based on nothing but leading the witness.

fitzov: These are the sorts of questions that need to be considered, and they can be summed-up in the following way:

If the consequences of allowing this person to live are worse (for all parties concerned) than those of executing him, then he should be executed.

M: More nonsense. Who is going to objectively identify the weight of each side of this balance, you? You prejudge and then claim to weigh.

maluckey: Without considering the TOTAL scenario and outcomes, you cannot/should not consider his fate. To either say he should live or die without doing so would be arbitrary at best...reckless at worst.

I for one could not either let him go to prison OR death without seeing ALL sides. Perhaps it's because I tend to be a realist instead of an idealist.

M: Who has the judgment to make a TOTAL evaluation, pray tell?

dna: Well, and for the actions that he took, he must now pay -- the majority of people don't react stabbing their 2-year olds with a kitchen knife.

M: Back to this absurd notion that people have to pay for their actions. We all pay for our actions. You want to place an additional tax, and that's where you stick your nose in with your biased and non objective opinion. Our question is all about the price, not the fact the killer will have to pay.

=============

Some of you are obsessed with the notion that bad people must be punished. Is it not because the fear of punishment is what keeps you in line. Are you not fearful that if there's no punishment you might lose it sometime and shoot somebody. Doesn't anybody anymore have internalized morals that don't need fear to manifest? No, you need your punishment because you were made to be what you are by being punished. You have authoritarian personalities. You are what you are because you have been turned into programmed machines. When you condemn others you condemn yourself. Why do you think Jesus rose from the dead after he forgave his killers? You are spiritually blind and asleep. I hope something will wake you up. The punishment for the need for retribution is a life sentence in a prison of your own making.

He who has made a door and a lock has also made a key.
 

Wheezer

Diamond Member
Nov 2, 1999
6,731
1
81
never said that I was tryng to help any cause...I just think and feel that the bastard deserves a slow painful death considering what he has done.

M: Yes, and as I said that makes you different in what way from the killer who decided the same thing about his wife and child. In other words, who gives a sh!t about what you think you think and feel. We need some assurance your thoughts and feelings are sane, no?

So you are equating killing an innocent child with killing his killer? I see. Sounds logical.

he choices are not scott free or death. There is the option of imprisonment, but when you look at that option, like I said he will come to be able to live with what he did...don't think so? Consider what it takes for someone to stab a 2 year old child to begin with. He will eventually develope a psychological mechanism that allows him to cope and possibly even justify what he did in his own mind....has he learned anything? does he feel remorse? He still gets free room and board, free meals, interaction with human beings, a chance at a better education etc. etc. all the while this child never gets a chance for anything...who knows what that life could have developed into? we'll never know.

M: Yes, and you also have come to live most comfortably with this wish to kill him which I consider to be equally insane. Why get pissed off at him for something you're doing too?

And again we see that you equate the two...nice so far.

So given the options, with all the benefits that prison has to offer and the fact he learns to live with his actions, yes he will get off scott free in comparison to death.

M: You mean he is going to suffer after he's dead? Where do you acquire this certainty as to what scott free and what isn't. Could it just be a silly opinion?

No sillier than your statement about Jesus rising from the dead....care to furnish any proof that is NOT based on a simplistic blind faith, if you can't, I would say that is an opinion.

Some are justified, some are not...this man made a choice...he choose poorly. Choosing poorly means that there are consequences to ones actions. Likewise choosing correctly means there is a reward to ones actions.

M: Leaving aside the silly argument you tried to make that killing in self defense is murder, where do you get this crazy notion that there should be consequences for our actions. There are always consequences of one kind or another, why do you think your notion of what they should be should prevail. Where do you get this ridiculous notion that bad choices should be punished when we are not talking, really, about choices at all. Of course you like to hold people responsible for their actions, call what they do choice, because that frees you to judge then as animals, but in fact they have no more choice in what they do than you do reacting as you do. You are incapable of making the right choice in how you should react, with compassionate understanding, because you are incapable of making that choice, so far. You are a machine just like the killer. You react according to the degree you are conscious.

#1- I am assuming that your self defense referral is having to do with a mother or wife protecting herself or her child? No one ever said that they had to do as the attack occured. What about women who wait months to kill thier abuser? They wait until he is asleep or in a vunerable state...why not leave and go to authorites instead?

My responses was to your blanket statement that all killing is based on self hate...you do remember saying that right? apparently you missed the connection.

Ummmm....moon people are animals, but they are animals that have the ability to make choices. Non human animals don't have that capacity, they use instincts over concious choice. They do what they do because they are simple minded creatures.

People always can make a choice, granted it is sometimes hard in the heat of the moment, but the fact remains, that the ability to choose is there. if no one is held responsible then where are we at?

You are hold me and many others you disagree with responsible for thier words do you not? Why? Why are you able to hold people accountable yet others are not? Are you not holding us accountable according to your standards? what makes that ok for you and no one else?...see were seeing that you are really no different and no better than the rest of us.

As much as your heart wants it to be about me and my personal feelings, it is not, it is about right and wrong and the punishment of the wrong choice and that the punishment should be at a minimum equal to the damage of the wrong choice, otherwise lessons are never learned. The topic about the effectiveness of the death penalty is a different matter and for another discussion.

M: You fail, continually, to see that your notions of punishment for wrong choices and eye for an eye revenge are about nothing more than you and your personal feelings. They are a total product of your own invention. They have no reality at all.

Ummmm...YEAH.... much like your lack of punishment for such actons are based on your feelings. If we depended on people like you, no one would get punished for anything apparently.

And as I have said, punishment is not always just about punishment, it is also about retribution. As it should be.

M: Sorry, but to claim something should be does nothing to prove the case.

your right, at least we agree on something...so stop making claims like: "just happen to know you both better than either of you know yourselves"

According to you since all you have is a claim, then you have no case.

If you don't think that there should be consequences for actions, then what do you think should happen?

Remember you said " where do you get this crazy notion that there should be consequences for our actions?"
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
73,156
6,317
126

W: never said that I was tryng to help any cause...I just think and feel that the bastard deserves a slow painful death considering what he has done.

M: Yes, and as I said that makes you different in what way from the killer who decided the same thing about his wife and child. In other words, who gives a sh!t about what you think you think and feel. We need some assurance your thoughts and feelings are sane, no?
-------
W: So you are equating killing an innocent child with killing his killer? I see. Sounds logical.

M: You needn't use the word logic when your argument is so full of passion. You are not capable of logic here. I said that your certainty that the killer should die is identical to the certainty the attempted killer had that his victims also needed to die. You and he share the same hate and emotional need to act it out. You simply call yours justified and his not. His point of view would in here be the opposite, so again you are just like him. You aren't used, I think, to looking at yourself so my points are hard for you to catch.
=============
W: The choices are not scott free or death. There is the option of imprisonment, but when you look at that option, like I said he will come to be able to live with what he did...don't think so? Consider what it takes for someone to stab a 2 year old child to begin with. He will eventually develope a psychological mechanism that allows him to cope and possibly even justify what he did in his own mind....has he learned anything? does he feel remorse? He still gets free room and board, free meals, interaction with human beings, a chance at a better education etc. etc. all the while this child never gets a chance for anything...who knows what that life could have developed into? we'll never know.

M: Yes, and you also have come to live most comfortably with this wish to kill him which I consider to be equally insane. Why get pissed off at him for something you're doing too?
------------
W: And again we see that you equate the two...nice so far.

M: Yes, you and the would be killer have much in common which is why you know so much about him and why, also, I know so much about you. Because you have no compassion for the killer you see nothing about yourself in him, but I don't have that problem to your extreme. I'm not a proud as you. I can see the killer in me.
==========
W:So given the options, with all the benefits that prison has to offer and the fact he learns to live with his actions, yes he will get off scott free in comparison to death.

M: You mean he is going to suffer after he's dead? Where do you acquire this certainty as to what scott free and what isn't. Could it just be a silly opinion?
-------
W: No sillier than your statement about Jesus rising from the dead....care to furnish any proof that is NOT based on a simplistic blind faith, if you can't, I would say that is an opinion.

M: Certainly, listen to me and forgive. See if you're not reborn. This axiom has been tested and proven for thousands of years.
=======
W: Some are justified, some are not...this man made a choice...he choose poorly. Choosing poorly means that there are consequences to ones actions. Likewise choosing correctly means there is a reward to ones actions.

M: Leaving aside the silly argument you tried to make that killing in self defense is murder, where do you get this crazy notion that there should be consequences for our actions. There are always consequences of one kind or another, why do you think your notion of what they should be should prevail. Where do you get this ridiculous notion that bad choices should be punished when we are not talking, really, about choices at all. Of course you like to hold people responsible for their actions, call what they do choice, because that frees you to judge then as animals, but in fact they have no more choice in what they do than you do reacting as you do. You are incapable of making the right choice in how you should react, with compassionate understanding, because you are incapable of making that choice, so far. You are a machine just like the killer. You react according to the degree you are conscious.
----------
W: #1- I am assuming that your self defense referral is having to do with a mother or wife protecting herself or her child? No one ever said that they had to do as the attack occured. What about women who wait months to kill thier abuser? They wait until he is asleep or in a vunerable state...why not leave and go to authorites instead?

My responses was to your blanket statement that all killing is based on self hate...you do remember saying that right? apparently you missed the connection.

M: No, you just missed the fact that we are discussing here a particular murder, a crime of family passion, a class of murder to which my statement always applies.

W: Ummmm....moon people are animals, but they are animals that have the ability to make choices. Non human animals don't have that capacity, they use instincts over concious choice. They do what they do because they are simple minded creatures.

M: Again you have far more pride than I do. I find myself to be a rather simple animal. I said that when a person is made to feel his self hate, get close to it via something triggering some repressed memory, the instant reaction is to kill. When a person, also through no fault of their own reached the age of maturity without developing any sort of moral character and self respect, he can act out those feelings. It has nothing to do with choice because all the things that motivate us are in us without any choice on our part, just as the failure to grow up responsibly and successfully mature is not something we can will. We are what circumstances have made us. Murder exists in the violent nation of America because our conditions dictate that it will occur and we do little to change that. You and I are as responsible for violence as the violent.

W: People always can make a choice, granted it is sometimes hard in the heat of the moment, but the fact remains, that the ability to choose is there. if no one is held responsible then where are we at?

M: You know, then, that what I say is true. Well there is something called a second chance. There is remediation, education, changing the environment, counseling, ministry, psychotherapy, tons of things. We have to hold people to standards that they not harm others, but we don't have to call those who do 'guilty or worthless scum'. In their circumstances they are likely just like we would be. It is circumstance that creates them and new circumstance can lead them also to change.
-----------
W: You are hold me and many others you disagree with responsible for thier words do you not? Why? Why are you able to hold people accountable yet others are not? Are you not holding us accountable according to your standards? what makes that ok for you and no one else?...see were seeing that you are really no different and no better than the rest of us.

M: No way. You can't be different than you are and I said that. You see at the level that your understanding permits and that is all you can see. You would have to choose to see what I say is so but you don't have that choice. You can't be held responsible for who you are because you are what you can be. I merely offer you a different circumstance. Quite likely you have never heard the truth before.
=====
W: As much as your heart wants it to be about me and my personal feelings, it is not, it is about right and wrong and the punishment of the wrong choice and that the punishment should be at a minimum equal to the damage of the wrong choice, otherwise lessons are never learned. The topic about the effectiveness of the death penalty is a different matter and for another discussion.

M: You fail, continually, to see that your notions of punishment for wrong choices and eye for an eye revenge are about nothing more than you and your personal feelings. They are a total product of your own invention. They have no reality at all.
----
W: Ummmm...YEAH.... much like your lack of punishment for such actons are based on your feelings. If we depended on people like you, no one would get punished for anything apparently.

M: Yes true. I would not punish but try to help people find the lost buried good that is in us all. Naturally I would have to keep people from harming others by a prison system of some kind, but I would try to treat the sick in the way that would have made them well had they always been treated that way. How will anybody learn to love others if they aren't themselves exposed to love? And, of course, how will anybody know if somebody changes if they themselves never have?
============
W: And as I have said, punishment is not always just about punishment, it is also about retribution. As it should be.

M: Sorry, but to claim something should be does nothing to prove the case. [/quote]
--------
W: your right, at least we agree on something...so stop making claims like: "just happen to know you both better than either of you know yourselves"

According to you since all you have is a claim, then you have no case.

M: Hehe, I can assure you that my case is obvious to others with vision and I am not arguing for the sake of arguing but I'm here to create conditions that just might affect your view. There is noting I can win or lose. I'm sort of following my bliss. :D
----------
W: If you don't think that there should be consequences for actions, then what do you think should happen?

M: There are consequences for actions. This putz will never know marital happiness or the pride of being a father. He may lose his life. He will certainly lose years and years of his life if not all of it as a prisoner. If he ever retrieves his deeper self he will experience crushing remorse and guilt and carry a tremendous burden. All I feel for him is deeply deeply sad. He grew up in darkness and never had a chance. His self hate was such that he had to make all the wrong choices.
-------------
W: Remember you said " where do you get this crazy notion that there should be consequences for our actions?"

M: Yes, you could never arrange consequences that can touch the ones this man has earned. He successfully proved he's the worst in the world.

 

maluckey

Platinum Member
Jan 31, 2003
2,933
0
71
Some of you are obsessed with the notion that bad people must be punished. Is it not because the fear of punishment is what keeps you in line. Are you not fearful that if there's no punishment you might lose it sometime and shoot somebody. Doesn't anybody anymore have internalized morals that don't need fear to manifest? No, you need your punishment because you were made to be what you are by being punished. You have authoritarian personalities. You are what you are because you have been turned into programmed machines.

Not even close.........twist it as you may, your pre-conceived notions, are a true example of a total lack of grounding in reality. Try your space-based thought path when you come back to the real world, where murders happen to those who do nothing to ask for it. Where babies are drowned, people dragged behind cars and women set on fire out of "love".

Taking a killer off the streets is not about "punishment". It's about saving the innocents, and stopping the killers, that you feel are already victimized by their crimes......HA!!! Tell that to Ted Bundy, or Ed Gein (just before they ate you).

Even a favorite pet that kills must be dealt with. Most always the decision is to put the animal to sleep. It is not because of vengeance, but of love of life, and sadness at seeing death for fun, as practiced by killers. Sure, I kill, but I get no joy from it. I am always saddened to see death before it's time.
 

Tom

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
13,293
1
76
Originally posted by: maluckey
Some of you are obsessed with the notion that bad people must be punished. Is it not because the fear of punishment is what keeps you in line. Are you not fearful that if there's no punishment you might lose it sometime and shoot somebody. Doesn't anybody anymore have internalized morals that don't need fear to manifest? No, you need your punishment because you were made to be what you are by being punished. You have authoritarian personalities. You are what you are because you have been turned into programmed machines.

Not even close.........twist it as you may, your pre-conceived notions, are a true example of a total lack of grounding in reality. Try your space-based thought path when you come back to the real world, where murders happen to those who do nothing to ask for it. Where babies are drowned, people dragged behind cars and women set on fire out of "love".

Taking a killer off the streets is not about "punishment". It's about saving the innocents, and stopping the killers, that you feel are already victimized by their crimes......HA!!! Tell that to Ted Bundy, or Ed Gein (just before they ate you).

Even a favorite pet that kills must be dealt with. Most always the decision is to put the animal to sleep. It is not because of vengeance, but of love of life, and sadness at seeing death for fun, as practiced by killers. Sure, I kill, but I get no joy from it. I am always saddened to see death before it's time.

did Moonbeam say that after a fair trial, convicted murderers shouln't be incarcerated ?

I haven't read every word in the thread, but my impression is he is saying that vengeance is driven by hate, and with hate you get murder.

Individuals act out of hate, and you get crimes like this. States act out of hate and you get the Khmer Rouge.


 

RapidSnail

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2006
4,257
0
0
"He that smiteth a man, so that he die, shall be surely put to death."

"Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man."


This scum does not deserve to live.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
73,156
6,317
126
Originally posted by: RapidSnail
"He that smiteth a man, so that he die, shall be surely put to death."

"Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man."


This scum does not deserve to live.

I thought that the Image of God made man said, 'Father forgive them for they know not what they do.' I think the god you quote is the one you made in your image and not the other way round. But it must be convenient to have all your opinions read to you from a book. You are indeed the robot program I spoke of who has no choice but to kill.

You understand, of course, that at the time of those words appeared there were no options like federal prisons.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
73,156
6,317
126
Originally posted by: Tom
Originally posted by: maluckey
Some of you are obsessed with the notion that bad people must be punished. Is it not because the fear of punishment is what keeps you in line. Are you not fearful that if there's no punishment you might lose it sometime and shoot somebody. Doesn't anybody anymore have internalized morals that don't need fear to manifest? No, you need your punishment because you were made to be what you are by being punished. You have authoritarian personalities. You are what you are because you have been turned into programmed machines.

Not even close.........twist it as you may, your pre-conceived notions, are a true example of a total lack of grounding in reality. Try your space-based thought path when you come back to the real world, where murders happen to those who do nothing to ask for it. Where babies are drowned, people dragged behind cars and women set on fire out of "love".

Taking a killer off the streets is not about "punishment". It's about saving the innocents, and stopping the killers, that you feel are already victimized by their crimes......HA!!! Tell that to Ted Bundy, or Ed Gein (just before they ate you).

Even a favorite pet that kills must be dealt with. Most always the decision is to put the animal to sleep. It is not because of vengeance, but of love of life, and sadness at seeing death for fun, as practiced by killers. Sure, I kill, but I get no joy from it. I am always saddened to see death before it's time.

did Moonbeam say that after a fair trial, convicted murderers shouln't be incarcerated ?

I haven't read every word in the thread, but my impression is he is saying that vengeance is driven by hate, and with hate you get murder.

Individuals act out of hate, and you get crimes like this. States act out of hate and you get the Khmer Rouge.

So true.

Basically what I am saying is that humanity is ignorant of the source from which violence and hate arise. They are the product of being punished as children for 'wrong doing' that in the process makes the child hate not only the wrong doing but the part of himself that did the deed, and that what was done as a child wasn't even 'sin' at all. We were made to hate ourselves, the part of ourselves that could have developed into the Image of God. This profound crushing of the source of our being has left us with pain and rage and the memories have been profoundly repressed. We are reminded of our hate for ourselves indirectly when somebody around us acts out from that same rage. The killer brings out all the hate that was dumped on us to make us 'behave' and we want to dump it on him. We give ourselves permission to act this out because he deserves just as we were told we too did. We have been made sick and insane by hate and we feel that more and more hate will fix everything, that punishment is what the world needs more of.

Thus we perpetuate our illness and make it more and more difficult to heal. Those now who are so sick that they cannot contain their hate and act it out on others have to be stopped from doing so and doing more and more of the same, but to hate them for what they did is to perpetuate ones own hate for what we did. We were not guilty of anything as children but we were made to hate ourselves anyway and until we stop the pretense that there is such a thing as guilt we will continue along being sick. Without understanding and compassion and forgiveness of the other there will be no forgiveness and compassion for us because it is us who now condemn ourselves. There is only love but we attach ourselves to our hate and say it's a good thing.

Until we understand that our hatred of the other is our hatred of ourselves we will live in the prison of our self hate. What we wish for others is what we are doing to ourselves. The more we hate the other the more difficult it will be to see that the other is us. You do not forgive or have compassion for the killer because he deserves it; you do so because you do.
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,525
9,839
146
Originally posted by: fitzov
If the consequences of allowing this person to live are worse (for all parties concerned) than those of executing him, then he should be executed.
Agreed! :thumbsup:

I mean, when that liberal astivist wuss Pontius Pilate washed his hands of the whole thing in Chirst v. The Roman Province of Jerusalem he covered himself in shame.

Fortuantely the mob -- no, wait, I mean a jury of his peers -- stepped up and did the right thing.

"Give us Barabas!"


 

rchiu

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2002
3,846
0
0
Originally posted by: Moonbeam

So true.

Basically what I am saying is that humanity is ignorant of the source from which violence and hate arise. They are the product of being punished as children for 'wrong doing' that in the process makes the child hate not only the wrong doing but the part of himself that did the deed, and that what was done as a child wasn't even 'sin' at all. We were made to hate ourselves, the part of ourselves that could have developed into the Image of God. This profound crushing of the source of our being has left us with pain and rage and the memories have been profoundly repressed. We are reminded of our hate for ourselves indirectly when somebody around us acts out from that same rage. The killer brings out all the hate that was dumped on us to make us 'behave' and we want to dump it on him. We give ourselves permission to act this out because he deserves just as we were told we too did. We have been made sick and insane by hate and we feel that more and more hate will fix everything, that punishment is what the world needs more of.

Thus we perpetuate our illness and make it more and more difficult to heal. Those now who are so sick that they cannot contain their hate and act it out on others have to be stopped from doing so and doing more and more of the same, but to hate them for what they did is to perpetuate ones own hate for what we did. We were not guilty of anything as children but we were made to hate ourselves anyway and until we stop the pretense that there is such a thing as guilt we will continue along being sick. Without understanding and compassion and forgiveness of the other there will be no forgiveness and compassion for us because it is us who now condemn ourselves. There is only love but we attach ourselves to our hate and say it's a good thing.

Until we understand that our hatred of the other is our hatred of ourselves we will live in the prison of our self hate. What we wish for others is what we are doing to ourselves. The more we hate the other the more difficult it will be to see that the other is us. You do not forgive or have compassion for the killer because he deserves it; you do so because you do.

Hmm, I don't get why people think executing murderer is a way of seeking revenge or a way to express our hatred for those murderers. I believe people should leave emotion out of an event like this. Let the guy get a fair trial, and if he is determined to be guilty, let the law decide what his fate is gonna be.

I do support death penalty, under the condition that people can get a fair trail and the system is able to determine the guilt of a person accurately. Death penalty to me is not a way to revenge the victim and punish the guilty, it is a way for a society to regulate the actions of the citizen, and make sure the citizen understand that certain actions are not acceptable in the society.

Let's face it, there are a large number of people who only understand consequences and punishment. If we do not set the law and make sure certain actions are punished, large number of people is gonna commit those actions. If all we do is sending those guilty to a correctional facility and have psychologist look at those people, what is gonna deter people from commiting all kinds of crimes?

A man stabbing a toddler, attempting to run over his wife with his car is an unacceptable behavior, under any kind of circumstances and mental condition. If you want to tell people in our society that it's okay to stab their own kids just because they are sad or depressed, by all mean, send him to some correctional facility and let him have a nice life there. But if you want to tell this society that this is an unacceptable behavior, you need to make sure that if the guy is convicted in a fair trial, get what he deserves.



 

1EZduzit

Lifer
Feb 4, 2002
11,833
1
0
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Jesus, why post this here and then suggest how you want to stab this poor sad fool in the head yourself? Isn't one assault enough for you?

There must be consequences for violence that act in preventing further violence. As to the man and case in question ? if found guilty of these crimes hard labor outdoors in Alaska sounds more fitting than the death penalty.

What the hell for. You can't undo what is done. You do not understand why people do what they do because you would need to understand yourself and there's no way in hell you will go there. The fate of the land of fools is foolishness. There can be no understanding that the whole world is mentally ill. There can began in the land of fools no program to find a way out. Fools are self condemned to their foolishness. We fools will kill the killer if we can, torture him if we can, punish and punish till the end of time, because inwardly we are all in hell ourselves. We can't begin to reform the extreme mentally ill among us because we can't begin to reform ourselves. You understand, I hope, that we can't admit to the slightest flaw, our egos, that is, because to have a flaw of any kind leads right into those hidden, deeply buried feelings of worthlessness and self hate. All evil must be crushed and put out of mind.

There must be consequences for acts that prevent further violence. What rubbish. Our illness is nothing but the result of the violence against our being that was done to us for our own good. We are mad because we expect more of the same will have a different result. We do what is sick because we are sick and we continue with what is sick because we want to stay sick. Fools love being fools. Wisdom, for a fool, is what creates fear, self recognition that he or she is a fool. It's not going to happen. Just witness the reaction to my words. Moonbeam has landed from Mars.

Hehe, not to worry, having lost everything I ever held dear, I don't need no more walls. The cool thing about hell is that it leaves you with ash. Mix that with some sh!t and you get fertilizer.

Putting aside the argument of punishment and law, I would like to know, hypothetically speaking, what you would have done if you were an on the spot witness to this tragedy and were in possesion fo a loaded gun?

Do you think you would have shoot the "perp" after he stabbed the women or perhaps after he stabbed the women and the child for the first time or stood there and watched him hack the child multiple times?

I realize he in now in custody and deserves a trial as guaranteed by the constitution, but what do you think you would do if you could possibley save an innocent person's life by shooting, and possibly taking the life of the "perp"??

I also realize that "I don't know" is a valid answer, so in that case what do you "think" you would have done?
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
73,156
6,317
126
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Jesus, why post this here and then suggest how you want to stab this poor sad fool in the head yourself? Isn't one assault enough for you?

There must be consequences for violence that act in preventing further violence. As to the man and case in question ? if found guilty of these crimes hard labor outdoors in Alaska sounds more fitting than the death penalty.

What the hell for. You can't undo what is done. You do not understand why people do what they do because you would need to understand yourself and there's no way in hell you will go there. The fate of the land of fools is foolishness. There can be no understanding that the whole world is mentally ill. There can began in the land of fools no program to find a way out. Fools are self condemned to their foolishness. We fools will kill the killer if we can, torture him if we can, punish and punish till the end of time, because inwardly we are all in hell ourselves. We can't begin to reform the extreme mentally ill among us because we can't begin to reform ourselves. You understand, I hope, that we can't admit to the slightest flaw, our egos, that is, because to have a flaw of any kind leads right into those hidden, deeply buried feelings of worthlessness and self hate. All evil must be crushed and put out of mind.

There must be consequences for acts that prevent further violence. What rubbish. Our illness is nothing but the result of the violence against our being that was done to us for our own good. We are mad because we expect more of the same will have a different result. We do what is sick because we are sick and we continue with what is sick because we want to stay sick. Fools love being fools. Wisdom, for a fool, is what creates fear, self recognition that he or she is a fool. It's not going to happen. Just witness the reaction to my words. Moonbeam has landed from Mars.

Hehe, not to worry, having lost everything I ever held dear, I don't need no more walls. The cool thing about hell is that it leaves you with ash. Mix that with some sh!t and you get fertilizer.

Putting aside the argument of punishment and law, I would like to know, hypothetically speaking, what you would have done if you were an on the spot witness to this tragedy and were in possesion fo a loaded gun?

Do you think you would have shoot the "perp" after he stabbed the women or perhaps after he stabbed the women and the child for the first time or stood there and watched him hack the child multiple times?

I realize he in now in custody and deserves a trial as guaranteed by the constitution, but what do you think you would do if you could possibley save an innocent person's life by shooting, and possibly taking the life of the "perp"??

I also realize that "I don't know" is a valid answer, so in that case what do you "think" you would have done?

I would have shot him, dead, if that was what it would take to stop him. I am not so great a marksman as to be sure I could stop him with some well placed shot. I would just shoot and hope for the best. The moment you act out your insanity on others is the moment you have to be stopped, by the ending of your life if that is what it takes if your intent is to kill another.
 

RapidSnail

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2006
4,257
0
0
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: RapidSnail
"He that smiteth a man, so that he die, shall be surely put to death."

"Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man."


This scum does not deserve to live.

I thought that the Image of God made man said, 'Father forgive them for they know not what they do.' I think the god you quote is the one you made in your image and not the other way round. But it must be convenient to have all your opinions read to you from a book. You are indeed the robot program I spoke of who has no choice but to kill.

You understand, of course, that at the time of those words appeared there were no options like federal prisons.

My point with the Bible quotes was to summarize my fealings about the situation. Of course, you can argue all you want about knowing more about myself than I do, but I don't care.

As for your misconstrued "God-said-this" quote, if you had known the context of the verse you would have known that Jesus was asking forgiveness on the part of the soldiers about to kill him. The soldiers didn't believe that they were about to kill the actual Son of God, but rather a sacriligeous apostate.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
73,156
6,317
126
Originally posted by: RapidSnail
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: RapidSnail
"He that smiteth a man, so that he die, shall be surely put to death."

"Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man."


This scum does not deserve to live.

I thought that the Image of God made man said, 'Father forgive them for they know not what they do.' I think the god you quote is the one you made in your image and not the other way round. But it must be convenient to have all your opinions read to you from a book. You are indeed the robot program I spoke of who has no choice but to kill.

You understand, of course, that at the time of those words appeared there were no options like federal prisons.

My point with the Bible quotes was to summarize my fealings about the situation. Of course, you can argue all you want about knowing more about myself than I do, but I don't care.

As for your misconstrued "God-said-this" quote, if you had known the context of the verse you would have known that Jesus was asking forgiveness on the part of the soldiers about to kill him. The soldiers didn't believe that they were about to kill the actual Son of God, but rather a sacriligeous apostate.

Nothing is going to make you care about the state of your feelings, but tell me. Why did Jesus care and you, who were created in his image, do not? Why do you think you see better than those soldiers?
 

LunarRay

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2003
9,993
1
76
Given I don't carry a gun nor a bow nor a knife I'd have done something to stop him too, Moonbeam... I don't know how to hurt someone they only taught us how to terminate someone... hehehehhehe but I'd have used that force needed to the extent of my force to stop him...

I think folks will read your post above and finally see that nothing you ever said meant that you'd not intervene or that you loved bad guys or any of that but, rather, the whys and wherefores of what makes humankind the most destructive force on Earth...

Maybe now.. folks won't feel so threatened and be able to touch the possibility of their own issues...
Not everyone is as full of hate as the killer in this thread... because not everyone has the same load to carry... but almost all have a load.. and it is often released in a verbal manner like on here.. this is good therapy for some... Don't cha think?
 

1EZduzit

Lifer
Feb 4, 2002
11,833
1
0
Originally posted by: Moonbeam

I would have shot him, dead, if that was what it would take to stop him. I am not so great a marksman as to be sure I could stop him with some well placed shot. I would just shoot and hope for the best. The moment you act out your insanity on others is the moment you have to be stopped, by the ending of your life if that is what it takes if your intent is to kill another.

That's what I thought. It would be the only reasonable course of action a man in that situation could take. Still, I don't think one knows if he could actually pull the trigger on another human being. I'm sure some can't , I know I would hesitate.
 

RapidSnail

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2006
4,257
0
0
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: RapidSnail
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: RapidSnail
"He that smiteth a man, so that he die, shall be surely put to death."

"Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man."


This scum does not deserve to live.

I thought that the Image of God made man said, 'Father forgive them for they know not what they do.' I think the god you quote is the one you made in your image and not the other way round. But it must be convenient to have all your opinions read to you from a book. You are indeed the robot program I spoke of who has no choice but to kill.

You understand, of course, that at the time of those words appeared there were no options like federal prisons.

My point with the Bible quotes was to summarize my fealings about the situation. Of course, you can argue all you want about knowing more about myself than I do, but I don't care.

As for your misconstrued "God-said-this" quote, if you had known the context of the verse you would have known that Jesus was asking forgiveness on the part of the soldiers about to kill him. The soldiers didn't believe that they were about to kill the actual Son of God, but rather a sacriligeous apostate.

Nothing is going to make you care about the state of your feelings, but tell me. Why did Jesus care and you, who were created in his image, do not? Why do you think you see better than those soldiers?

Why don't you read the Bible yourself and find out? It's all there in black and white, plain as day. I'm not here to get into a Biblical debate as I'm just wasting time with the skeptics and those who cannot discern for themselves what the Book says.
 

RapidSnail

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2006
4,257
0
0
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I would have shot him, dead, if that was what it would take to stop him. I am not so great a marksman as to be sure I could stop him with some well placed shot. I would just shoot and hope for the best. The moment you act out your insanity on others is the moment you have to be stopped, by the ending of your life if that is what it takes if your intent is to kill another.

:confused:

Most perplexing...
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
MONDAY UPDATE-
Hours after his divorce was finalized, a Dallas man kidnapped his ex-wife and 2-year-old daughter Friday evening before stabbing them in the middle of a traffic jam and running over the woman in Baton Rouge, La., police said.

The former wife and the daughter of Jimmie Dixon, 27, remained hospitalized but are expected to survive. The child had a knife in her head when Mr. Dixon put her on the freeway and drove off, police said.

Mr. Dixon, who told authorities he lived in the White Rock area, is in the East Baton Rouge Parish Jail on several charges.


Capt. Jeff Smith, a police spokesman, said Mr. Dixon, the woman and child were in his car arguing when he drove off.

Police said Mr. Dixon drove south on Interstate 110 and began stabbing the woman. "They got stopped in traffic just due to regular afternoon congestion," Capt. Smith said. "She jumped out" of the vehicle and ran to the car of a sheriff's deputy also stopped in traffic.

"In the meantime, he's already stabbed the baby," Capt. Smith said. "He set the baby out on the roadway," drove into his ex-wife, and struck the deputy's car before fleeing, he said.

Mr. Dixon's vehicle hit parked cars and three poles, then flipped
So this was kidnapping and then attempted murder, does it being "premeditated change any minds?

I have not yet found an update on the condition of the little girl.
 

1EZduzit

Lifer
Feb 4, 2002
11,833
1
0
I don't see anything there would would prove this was pre-meditated? Sounds more like he just snapped?


 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
73,156
6,317
126
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
I don't see anything there would would prove this was pre-meditated? Sounds more like he just snapped?

Exactly, his wife via the divorce, made him feel how worthless he has felt since a child. She rejected him just as he was rejected for being perfect as a baby. He could not take in the possibility that there really was now something wrong with him because he hated himself so much. He had to blame her for in the delusion that it was she who was making him feel so bad. His inner pain was tremendous and when it came out it was too much for his understanding to handle. He had no idea what it really was he was experiencing because he had no idea what it was he was feeling.

edit: It doesn't mean he couldn't methodically plan her death. It's just that he didn't know his the root of his motivation. He knew not what he did, or shall we say why he did.
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Killing this guy -- as sick, deranged and as much as he deserves it -- is not going to bring the little girl back (assuming she's been killed) nor will it reverse the injuries to the mom. You don't stop people from killing people by killing them. It's purely a revenge cycle similar to what we see in the Middle East where revenge is a given and revenge killings the norm. Besides, for many of these people, they want to die. It's an easy way out. Death by cop, or by the State. For them, life in prison w/o possibility of parole is a far worse punishment...