Man Derek Jeter is cocky.

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Jul 1, 2000
10,274
2
0
Originally posted by: lager
I hate how he always pumps his fist and that stupid smirk he gives. Such a cocky player, yet, the highest paid Yankee on the roster. :Q He's lucky he plays for the Yanks. Nobody would give a him a second look if he didn't.

You must be high.
 

NeoV

Diamond Member
Apr 18, 2000
9,504
2
81
anyone who saysHe's lucky he plays for the Yanks. Nobody would give a him a second look if he didn't is automatically disqualified from having their baseball-related opinions mean anything.....
 

Lifer

Banned
Feb 17, 2003
1,948
0
0
Originally posted by: Gr1mL0cK
Considering the Yankees have about 20+ WS title and the Redsox has none since 1918, I think is pretty much a given Yankee = better than the Redsox :p

Well if every team spent the same amount as the Yankees to buy their championships that wouldn't be the case.

And I'm not a Red Sox fan, and I don't even care for baseball...

not true, look at the mets.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Originally posted by: Lifer
Originally posted by: Gr1mL0cK
Considering the Yankees have about 20+ WS title and the Redsox has none since 1918, I think is pretty much a given Yankee = better than the Redsox :p

Well if every team spent the same amount as the Yankees to buy their championships that wouldn't be the case.

And I'm not a Red Sox fan, and I don't even care for baseball...

not true, look at the mets.

The Mets don't spend the same amount of money that the Yankees do. The Yankees are the only team this year that is over the luxury tax mark.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: SP33Demon

The notion that teams with the highest payroll in baseball aren't the best is total BS. Yeah, you can take this year as an anomaly but the Yankees have won their division for what, the past 8 years or something straight? I hardly doubt that's a coincidence, especially when u have the best that money can buy. It doesn't take a genious to realize that someone paid 30K at a job is going to work a little less harder than someone paid 100K expected to be the best, especially when you see people on your level being paid twice your salary and you think you're underpaid. AROD is a good example, after getting his contract he blew the f up and is performing at much higher levels than previous years.

How come the A's can't win every time they make it to the playoffs? Once again, a couple of utility men, roleplayers and one superstar will not win a WS for you. You need to go out and buy multiple superstars 9 times out of 10 (i.e. Braves, Yankees etc). With the (pseudo) salary cap things are evening out a little (hence teams like the A's/Twins/Chicago's/KC's rising), but why even have one if teams like the Yankees just ignore it? How much did NY pay in luxury tax this year?? Why not just buy Barry Bonds, Manny, and Vlad for your outfield since money isn't an option (don't be surprised to see it in the future).
Here's something to keep in mind.

Bought: Clemens, Mussina, Giambi, Matsui.
Home Grown: Derek Jeter, Alfonso Soriano, Bernie Williams, Mariano Rivera, Andy Pettite, Jorge Posada.

Also, it's not the George has more money than alot of the other owners. Sure, he's wealthier than some, but some owners blow him away. It's his willingness to spend that money on his team.

Soriano was bought. Not many teams would spend a few million on a player that was completely unproven. He's willing to spend more money b/c he has a larger revenue stream from his team than any other team.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Originally posted by: bigdog1218
Last time I checked Manny makes more than anyone on the Yankees, so both teams are inflating salaries. Also, the Red Sox are now third in salary, and if it wasn't for the Yankees, everyone would be bitching about the Red Sox trying to buy a championship, because thats what they are trying to do. The Yankees have a good farm system, I don't even think the Red Sox have a farm system anymore.
Who cares if the Red Sox are third in salary? The Yankees spend how much more?

Your last line is a complete lie. The Yankees do not have a good farm system.
 

ThePresence

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
27,727
16
81
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: SP33Demon

The notion that teams with the highest payroll in baseball aren't the best is total BS. Yeah, you can take this year as an anomaly but the Yankees have won their division for what, the past 8 years or something straight? I hardly doubt that's a coincidence, especially when u have the best that money can buy. It doesn't take a genious to realize that someone paid 30K at a job is going to work a little less harder than someone paid 100K expected to be the best, especially when you see people on your level being paid twice your salary and you think you're underpaid. AROD is a good example, after getting his contract he blew the f up and is performing at much higher levels than previous years.

How come the A's can't win every time they make it to the playoffs? Once again, a couple of utility men, roleplayers and one superstar will not win a WS for you. You need to go out and buy multiple superstars 9 times out of 10 (i.e. Braves, Yankees etc). With the (pseudo) salary cap things are evening out a little (hence teams like the A's/Twins/Chicago's/KC's rising), but why even have one if teams like the Yankees just ignore it? How much did NY pay in luxury tax this year?? Why not just buy Barry Bonds, Manny, and Vlad for your outfield since money isn't an option (don't be surprised to see it in the future).
Here's something to keep in mind.

Bought: Clemens, Mussina, Giambi, Matsui.
Home Grown: Derek Jeter, Alfonso Soriano, Bernie Williams, Mariano Rivera, Andy Pettite, Jorge Posada.

Also, it's not the George has more money than alot of the other owners. Sure, he's wealthier than some, but some owners blow him away. It's his willingness to spend that money on his team.

Soriano was bought. Not many teams would spend a few million on a player that was completely unproven. He's willing to spend more money b/c he has a larger revenue stream from his team than any other team.
They spent money on him because they have really good scouting who saw the potential in him. Other people weren't willing to take the chance. He was horrible when he first came up.
George has a bigger revenue stream because he puts a really good product on the field year after year. It's smart business, and he's willing to make the investment. Who's to say if other teams spent money, they wouldn't get the big TV contracts a few years down the line?
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Originally posted by: xospec1alk
I dont think the yankees have a farm system anymore either after they traded the farm guys away for big name players friggin bastards.

and when jeter's contract was up, he didn't re-up for a whole crap load of money, he got decent money iirc. and what about texas paying arod 200 mill or something? thats inflating salaries...not the friggin yankees....

Are you kidding? Jeter's contract gives him an average of almost $19 million/year. The Yankees have some signficant backloaded contracts.

$189 million is not decent money for a player of Jeter's abilities. He's a good player, but not worth $19 million a year. If Jeter is worth $19 million/year, then AROD is easily worth $25 million/year.
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
143
106
Originally posted by: Lifer
Originally posted by: Gr1mL0cK
Considering the Yankees have about 20+ WS title and the Redsox has none since 1918, I think is pretty much a given Yankee = better than the Redsox :p

Well if every team spent the same amount as the Yankees to buy their championships that wouldn't be the case.

And I'm not a Red Sox fan, and I don't even care for baseball...

not true, look at the mets.
The Mets? LOL... they spent 64 Million less and take 2nd place, and teams with higher payrolls aren't going to ALWAYS win it. You say it like it's a law of nature (it's a trend), lol. Note that this $64 million difference between #1 and 2 is about the budget of THIRTEEN teams. That's close to 50% of the league for Christ's sake!
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Originally posted by: NeoV
anyone who saysHe's lucky he plays for the Yanks. Nobody would give a him a second look if he didn't is automatically disqualified from having their baseball-related opinions mean anything.....

He obviously would not be as famous - I think he would be like Vidro or Abreu in terms of popularity and acknowledgement.

 

ThePresence

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
27,727
16
81
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Originally posted by: NeoV
anyone who saysHe's lucky he plays for the Yanks. Nobody would give a him a second look if he didn't is automatically disqualified from having their baseball-related opinions mean anything.....

He obviously would not be as famous - I think he would be like Vidro or Abreu in terms of popularity and acknowledgement.

Oh please. How many players in the league would have made the play to the plate that he did a couple of years back to get Jeremy Giambi? The guy is a heads up, solid fundamental, leader and player. He'd make a great manager one day.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: SP33Demon

The notion that teams with the highest payroll in baseball aren't the best is total BS. Yeah, you can take this year as an anomaly but the Yankees have won their division for what, the past 8 years or something straight? I hardly doubt that's a coincidence, especially when u have the best that money can buy. It doesn't take a genious to realize that someone paid 30K at a job is going to work a little less harder than someone paid 100K expected to be the best, especially when you see people on your level being paid twice your salary and you think you're underpaid. AROD is a good example, after getting his contract he blew the f up and is performing at much higher levels than previous years.

How come the A's can't win every time they make it to the playoffs? Once again, a couple of utility men, roleplayers and one superstar will not win a WS for you. You need to go out and buy multiple superstars 9 times out of 10 (i.e. Braves, Yankees etc). With the (pseudo) salary cap things are evening out a little (hence teams like the A's/Twins/Chicago's/KC's rising), but why even have one if teams like the Yankees just ignore it? How much did NY pay in luxury tax this year?? Why not just buy Barry Bonds, Manny, and Vlad for your outfield since money isn't an option (don't be surprised to see it in the future).
Here's something to keep in mind.

Bought: Clemens, Mussina, Giambi, Matsui.
Home Grown: Derek Jeter, Alfonso Soriano, Bernie Williams, Mariano Rivera, Andy Pettite, Jorge Posada.

Also, it's not the George has more money than alot of the other owners. Sure, he's wealthier than some, but some owners blow him away. It's his willingness to spend that money on his team.

Soriano was bought. Not many teams would spend a few million on a player that was completely unproven. He's willing to spend more money b/c he has a larger revenue stream from his team than any other team.
They spent money on him because they have really good scouting who saw the potential in him. Other people weren't willing to take the chance. He was horrible when he first came up.
George has a bigger revenue stream because he puts a really good product on the field year after year. It's smart business, and he's willing to make the investment. Who's to say if other teams spent money, they wouldn't get the big TV contracts a few years down the line?

That doesn't eliminate the fact that he was actually bought over other teams b/c the Yankees were willing to spend $3.1 million on him. Not many teams would have the money to do that. It's not like Soriano was the only 'prospect' that the Yankees bought. What about El Duquecito, Morales, Henson, etc? Don't try to make it like he wasn't bought.

George has a bigger revenue stream for the same reason that the Mets have a bigger revenue stream than the A's. It's called the market size.


 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Originally posted by: NeoV
anyone who saysHe's lucky he plays for the Yanks. Nobody would give a him a second look if he didn't is automatically disqualified from having their baseball-related opinions mean anything.....

He obviously would not be as famous - I think he would be like Vidro or Abreu in terms of popularity and acknowledgement.

Oh please. How many players in the league would have made the play to the plate that he did a couple of years back to get Jeremy Giambi? The guy is a heads up, solid fundamental, leader and player. He'd make a great manager one day.

Oh please, if he played for the Royals, he OBVIOUSLY would not be as famous. He's a good player, but so are players like Vidro or Abreu. This is not a 'knock' on Jeter - he's a good player, one of the best SS in the game. However, if he wasn't on the Yankees or any other big market team, then he wouldn't be as well known.

 

Ynog

Golden Member
Oct 9, 2002
1,782
1
0
Just because someone's home grown, doesn't mean that money does help that. There is a reason why they have
so many home grown stars. Because not only do they pay for alot of "potential talent" which they have, but if it
really becomes good, they have the money to keep it.

Do say that other owners have more money than Steinbrenner is easy. He isn't Bill Gates. however he spent 180 million
this year. And teh Yankees made money. While alot of teams either made who spent less, either made little or lost money.
San Fran has to cut payroll because they lost money. Do forget the YES network makes alot of money for the Yankees.
And that money goes into helping making the Yankees better.

Its true that just having a high payroll will make you good isn't true, but it doesn't hurt either. If the Yankees want a player,
they will pay for him. No matter the price. They paid 32 million for Contreras, just so they Sox wouldn't get him. You know they
will pay for Vlad if they want him. And if Jeter wasn't a Yankee, ARod would be a Yankee making even more than what he is now.
The Yankees get the players they want. However not winning a World Series is a failure. No other team is like that. While the
Sox might be mad to not get past the Yankees, they were not expected to win the world series, so while a disappointment,
its not failure. While if the Yankees don't win the World Series someone will get fired. Kind of odd when an owner expects titles.
 

ThePresence

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
27,727
16
81
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: SP33Demon

The notion that teams with the highest payroll in baseball aren't the best is total BS. Yeah, you can take this year as an anomaly but the Yankees have won their division for what, the past 8 years or something straight? I hardly doubt that's a coincidence, especially when u have the best that money can buy. It doesn't take a genious to realize that someone paid 30K at a job is going to work a little less harder than someone paid 100K expected to be the best, especially when you see people on your level being paid twice your salary and you think you're underpaid. AROD is a good example, after getting his contract he blew the f up and is performing at much higher levels than previous years.

How come the A's can't win every time they make it to the playoffs? Once again, a couple of utility men, roleplayers and one superstar will not win a WS for you. You need to go out and buy multiple superstars 9 times out of 10 (i.e. Braves, Yankees etc). With the (pseudo) salary cap things are evening out a little (hence teams like the A's/Twins/Chicago's/KC's rising), but why even have one if teams like the Yankees just ignore it? How much did NY pay in luxury tax this year?? Why not just buy Barry Bonds, Manny, and Vlad for your outfield since money isn't an option (don't be surprised to see it in the future).
Here's something to keep in mind.

Bought: Clemens, Mussina, Giambi, Matsui.
Home Grown: Derek Jeter, Alfonso Soriano, Bernie Williams, Mariano Rivera, Andy Pettite, Jorge Posada.

Also, it's not the George has more money than alot of the other owners. Sure, he's wealthier than some, but some owners blow him away. It's his willingness to spend that money on his team.

Soriano was bought. Not many teams would spend a few million on a player that was completely unproven. He's willing to spend more money b/c he has a larger revenue stream from his team than any other team.
They spent money on him because they have really good scouting who saw the potential in him. Other people weren't willing to take the chance. He was horrible when he first came up.
George has a bigger revenue stream because he puts a really good product on the field year after year. It's smart business, and he's willing to make the investment. Who's to say if other teams spent money, they wouldn't get the big TV contracts a few years down the line?

That doesn't eliminate the fact that he was actually bought over other teams b/c the Yankees were willing to spend $3.1 million on him. Not many teams would have the money to do that. It's not like Soriano was the only 'prospect' that the Yankees bought. What about El Duquecito, Morales, Henson, etc? Don't try to make it like he wasn't bought.

George has a bigger revenue stream for the same reason that the Mets have a bigger revenue stream than the A's. It's called the market size.
If it's just market size, then the Mets should have the same payroll as the Yankees. They don't, why? If the owner is just not willing to spend, then screw him if they can't win. But if he can't afford it, then why can the Yankees afford it? Probably because of the TV contracts. Why do the Yankees get such big TV money? Because people want to watch a good team, a winner. And that's only because George is willing to pay the money. (I realize that now with the YES network things are a little different, but the concept is the same.)
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
143
106
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Originally posted by: xospec1alk
I dont think the yankees have a farm system anymore either after they traded the farm guys away for big name players friggin bastards.

and when jeter's contract was up, he didn't re-up for a whole crap load of money, he got decent money iirc. and what about texas paying arod 200 mill or something? thats inflating salaries...not the friggin yankees....

Are you kidding? Jeter's contract gives him an average of almost $19 million/year. The Yankees have some signficant backloaded contracts.

$189 million is not decent money for a player of Jeter's abilities. He's a good player, but not worth $19 million a year. If Jeter is worth $19 million/year, then AROD is easily worth $25 million/year.
What does Nomar make again? (Hint: 10.5)... Now either he's severely underpaid, or Jeter's overpaid. After all, Nomar hits alot better than Jeter.

Jeter also makes more than anyone on the Boston team. Yet NINE Boston players had more RBI's than him. Look up overpaid in the dictionary, and you'll see the Yankees logo under it.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: SP33Demon

The notion that teams with the highest payroll in baseball aren't the best is total BS. Yeah, you can take this year as an anomaly but the Yankees have won their division for what, the past 8 years or something straight? I hardly doubt that's a coincidence, especially when u have the best that money can buy. It doesn't take a genious to realize that someone paid 30K at a job is going to work a little less harder than someone paid 100K expected to be the best, especially when you see people on your level being paid twice your salary and you think you're underpaid. AROD is a good example, after getting his contract he blew the f up and is performing at much higher levels than previous years.

How come the A's can't win every time they make it to the playoffs? Once again, a couple of utility men, roleplayers and one superstar will not win a WS for you. You need to go out and buy multiple superstars 9 times out of 10 (i.e. Braves, Yankees etc). With the (pseudo) salary cap things are evening out a little (hence teams like the A's/Twins/Chicago's/KC's rising), but why even have one if teams like the Yankees just ignore it? How much did NY pay in luxury tax this year?? Why not just buy Barry Bonds, Manny, and Vlad for your outfield since money isn't an option (don't be surprised to see it in the future).
Here's something to keep in mind.

Bought: Clemens, Mussina, Giambi, Matsui.
Home Grown: Derek Jeter, Alfonso Soriano, Bernie Williams, Mariano Rivera, Andy Pettite, Jorge Posada.

Also, it's not the George has more money than alot of the other owners. Sure, he's wealthier than some, but some owners blow him away. It's his willingness to spend that money on his team.

Soriano was bought. Not many teams would spend a few million on a player that was completely unproven. He's willing to spend more money b/c he has a larger revenue stream from his team than any other team.
They spent money on him because they have really good scouting who saw the potential in him. Other people weren't willing to take the chance. He was horrible when he first came up.
George has a bigger revenue stream because he puts a really good product on the field year after year. It's smart business, and he's willing to make the investment. Who's to say if other teams spent money, they wouldn't get the big TV contracts a few years down the line?

That doesn't eliminate the fact that he was actually bought over other teams b/c the Yankees were willing to spend $3.1 million on him. Not many teams would have the money to do that. It's not like Soriano was the only 'prospect' that the Yankees bought. What about El Duquecito, Morales, Henson, etc? Don't try to make it like he wasn't bought.

George has a bigger revenue stream for the same reason that the Mets have a bigger revenue stream than the A's. It's called the market size.
If it's just market size, then the Mets should have the same payroll as the Yankees. They don't, why? If the owner is just not willing to spend, then screw him if they can't win. But if he can't afford it, then why can the Yankees afford it? Probably because of the TV contracts. Why do the Yankees get such big TV money? Because people want to watch a good team, a winner. And that's only because George is willing to pay the money. (I realize that now with the YES network things are a little different, but the concept is the same.)

Well it's not only market size, as you just illustrated. Even when losing, I'm sure that the Yankees (and to a lesser extent the Mets/Red Sox/etc) would have a significantly larger revenue stream than a team like the A's.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Originally posted by: xospec1alk
I dont think the yankees have a farm system anymore either after they traded the farm guys away for big name players friggin bastards.

and when jeter's contract was up, he didn't re-up for a whole crap load of money, he got decent money iirc. and what about texas paying arod 200 mill or something? thats inflating salaries...not the friggin yankees....

Are you kidding? Jeter's contract gives him an average of almost $19 million/year. The Yankees have some signficant backloaded contracts.

$189 million is not decent money for a player of Jeter's abilities. He's a good player, but not worth $19 million a year. If Jeter is worth $19 million/year, then AROD is easily worth $25 million/year.
What does Nomar make again? (Hint: 10.5)... Now either he's severely underpaid, or Jeter's overpaid. After all, Nomar hits alot better than Jeter.

Jeter also makes more than anyone on the Boston team. Yet NINE Boston players had more RBI's than him. Look up overpaid in the dictionary, and you'll see the Yankees logo under it.

Ummm...I was saying that Jeter is overpaid with his $19 million/year on average contract. Actually, this year Nomar was not a better hitter than Jeter. However, I guess you could say that he was a little better if you factor in defense as STATISTICALLY, Jeter is usually ranked fairly low.

If Garciaparra was a free agent today, he would probably make more than $10.5 million. He signed this contract a while ago.

 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
143
106
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Well it's not only market size, as you just illustrated. Even when losing, I'm sure that the Yankees (and to a lesser extent the Mets/Red Sox/etc) would have a significantly larger revenue stream than a team like the A's.

Many would argue that the Yankees have a larger market than the Mets, i.e. more fans outside of the NorthEast.
 

ThePresence

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
27,727
16
81
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Well it's not only market size, as you just illustrated. Even when losing, I'm sure that the Yankees (and to a lesser extent the Mets/Red Sox/etc) would have a significantly larger revenue stream than a team like the A's.

Well then, I go back to my original point. Maybe if the A's made a big investment and spent alot of money, they'd become winners year in and year out. If that happened, maybe people would want to watch them. If people want to watch them, then they get the big TV money too. Then they can compete with the Yankees on a level playing field.
 

isekii

Lifer
Mar 16, 2001
28,578
3
81
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Well it's not only market size, as you just illustrated. Even when losing, I'm sure that the Yankees (and to a lesser extent the Mets/Red Sox/etc) would have a significantly larger revenue stream than a team like the A's.

Many would argue that the Yankees have a larger market than the Mets, i.e. more fans outside of the NorthEast.

Yanks have loyal fans.

Look at the Knicks. They suck and they still sell out.
 

bigdog1218

Golden Member
Mar 7, 2001
1,674
2
0
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Originally posted by: bigdog1218
Last time I checked Manny makes more than anyone on the Yankees, so both teams are inflating salaries. Also, the Red Sox are now third in salary, and if it wasn't for the Yankees, everyone would be bitching about the Red Sox trying to buy a championship, because thats what they are trying to do. The Yankees have a good farm system, I don't even think the Red Sox have a farm system anymore.
Who cares if the Red Sox are third in salary? The Yankees spend how much more?

Your last line is a complete lie. The Yankees do not have a good farm system.

Well since you are an absolute genius, here are some links

Evil Empire
Red Sux

If you can read it says the Yankees don't have the best farm system like they did 2000, 2001, but they still have a good farm system.

And I still can't believe idiot red sox fans complain about the yankees salary, considering how much they spend. Someone on ESPN made a good point about the bidding for Contreras stating that even though they lost, the Red Sox did outbid 28 other teams. They try to pull the same tactics the Yankees do, but no one wants to play for the Red Sox.

And here are the latest salaries for mlb, along with the 2006 WS champions,

Go Muts!!!

Jeter also makes more than anyone on the Boston team. Yet NINE Boston players had more RBI's than him. Look up overpaid in the dictionary, and you'll see the Yankees logo under it.

Where do you people get these facts? Jeters 2003 salary = 15,600,000, Mannys 2003 salary = 17,185,177, Pedro = 15,500,000.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Well it's not only market size, as you just illustrated. Even when losing, I'm sure that the Yankees (and to a lesser extent the Mets/Red Sox/etc) would have a significantly larger revenue stream than a team like the A's.

Many would argue that the Yankees have a larger market than the Mets, i.e. more fans outside of the NorthEast.

Yes, that's why I said 'to a lesser extent'.

Although I'm a fan of a big market baseball team, I wish things were a little more even between the small market teams and the big market teams. I don't think that a small market team, even after winning 4 WS in a row, would be able to significantly increase their base market size to support the team enough to consistently spend $100 million more.