FIVR
Diamond Member
- Jun 1, 2016
- 3,753
- 911
- 106
AFAIK the city of los angeles itself has not been touched by the fire. The greater los angeles area is where those fires are located, not Los Angeles city proper.I guess the Creek, Rye, and Skirball fires don't count as LA? I mean it's not like the Creek fire is in the Angeles National Forest or anything.
Even the greater Los Angeles area is largely untouched. Downtown LA, Santa monica, the south bay, east and south LA are all perfectly fine. A few people's rich mansions in the hills burned down. I do not GAF about rupert murdoch losing his home, those people should've maintained the vegetation on their properties such that a fire would not consume it. It is their own fault.