Looks like The Titanic killed a few more people

Page 20 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
16,139
8,733
136
Just a wild ass guess: Someone in the crew (from the top on down) accidentally damaged the hull and tried to hide that fact, presuming the damage wasn't bad enough that the perp thought he/she could get away with hiding the fact of the matter. If so, that person(s) should be squirming themselve(s) into knots at the moment. I'm wondering if the insurance firm that's covering this multi-million $$$ loss has the best headhunter available working on this tragic...well let's call this an "accident" for now.

The hope is that there is enough debris that'll be collected to precisely determine the cause of the hull implosion.
 
Dec 10, 2005
29,670
15,254
136
Just a wild ass guess: Someone in the crew (from the top on down) accidentally damaged the hull and tried to hide that fact, presuming the damage wasn't bad enough that the perp thought he/she could get away with hiding the fact of the matter. If so, that person(s) should be squirming themselve(s) into knots at the moment. I'm wondering if the insurance firm that's covering this multi-million $$$ loss has the best headhunter available working on this tragic...well let's call this an "accident" for now.

The hope is that there is enough debris that'll be collected to precisely determine the cause of the hull implosion.
It could just have easily been a case of the wrong material for the job. The whole organization sounds like a nightmare when it came to any sort of safety culture.
 
Nov 17, 2019
13,444
7,906
136
Yeah, I think it's already been said that they overused it. Having survived more dives than it probably should have to begin with. Planes have a limited number of flying hours before being scrapped or overhauled.
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
16,139
8,733
136
What's with the speculation? Occam's razor says that sub only had a few dozen cycles of life and they found the end of it. it is a piss poor material for that environment.
Everybody else uses titanium or steel, homogeneous materials that won't admit water into their very fabric.

Thanks for the info that I was not aware of. So following along this train of thought, would you happen to know if there was some regulatory agency, say the Coast Guard for example, that was responsible for assuring the safety of that vessel as that agency does with surface craft both personal and commercial?
 

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
17,761
16,113
146
Just a wild ass guess: Someone in the crew (from the top on down) accidentally damaged the hull and tried to hide that fact, presuming the damage wasn't bad enough that the perp thought he/she could get away with hiding the fact of the matter. If so, that person(s) should be squirming themselve(s) into knots at the moment. I'm wondering if the insurance firm that's covering this multi-million $$$ loss has the best headhunter available working on this tragic...well let's call this an "accident" for now.

The hope is that there is enough debris that'll be collected to precisely determine the cause of the hull implosion.
Yes and that guy was the CEO when he approved the design, construction and use.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
30,313
31,360
136
Thanks for the info that I was not aware of. So following along this train of thought, would you happen to know if there was some regulatory agency, say the Coast Guard for example, that was responsible for assuring the safety of that vessel as that agency does with surface craft both personal and commercial?
Nope. Submersibles are considered cargo and not subject to the same regulations as ships. It’s why there are industry practices and defined processes for certification (strictly voluntary) which the CEO deliberately chose not to follow.

 

Geven

Banned
May 15, 2023
54
26
51
I tend to think that it happened because one of the crew members went totally mad and crushed everything inside the tube. Not everyone can withstand being in such a small space for hours and there would be no surprise if someone just lost their shit and ruined the whole thing causing it to implode
 
  • Like
Reactions: zinfamous

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,936
10,827
147
I tend to think that it happened because one of the crew members went totally mad and crushed everything inside the tube. Not everyone can withstand being in such a small space for hours and there would be no surprise if someone just lost their shit and ruined the whole thing causing it to implode
And I think you should join Harry's Razors club. No, wait, even better, Occam's!
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
30,313
31,360
136
I tend to think that it happened because one of the crew members went totally mad and crushed everything inside the tube. Not everyone can withstand being in such a small space for hours and there would be no surprise if someone just lost their shit and ruined the whole thing causing it to implode
Did you forget the /s?
 
Last edited:

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
73,651
35,459
136
They found the necklace and the astronaut from the Britney Spears video killed everyone and took it to Mars.
 

eelw

Lifer
Dec 4, 1999
10,413
5,549
136
Wow first it’s Biden using this story to hide Hunter. Then it’s a crew who damaged the hatch. Now it’s a passenger who went crazy inside. How about it was the owner who created a piss poor product. Why does this story need any conspiracy theories.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
30,313
31,360
136
Wow first it’s Biden using this story to hide Hunter. Then it’s a crew who damaged the hatch. Now it’s a passenger who went crazy inside. How about it was the owner who created a piss poor product. Why does this story need any conspiracy theories.
Because we have become collectively stupid. And the internet gives the dumbest among us a broad platform.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,994
31,557
146
Wow first it’s Biden using this story to hide Hunter. Then it’s a crew who damaged the hatch. Now it’s a passenger who went crazy inside. How about it was the owner who created a piss poor product. Why does this story need any conspiracy theories.

Hello sir, this is the internet. Please take your simple, rational questions to the nearest Arby's drive-in order box. Thank you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meghan54

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
26,575
12,672
136
What's with the speculation? Occam's razor says that sub only had a few dozen cycles of life and they found the end of it. it is a piss poor material for that environment.
Everybody else uses titanium or steel, homogeneous materials that won't admit water into their very fabric.
There was this lady expert on CNN who said that salt water eventually gets into the layers and guess what? A work function differential is also present due to using dissimilar materials, add salt water and epoxy resins break down. This was a known phenomenon to the community.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: igor_kavinski

uclaLabrat

Diamond Member
Aug 2, 2007
5,632
3,046
136
There was this lady expert on CNN who said that salt water eventually gets into the layers and guess what? A work function differential is also present due to using dissimilar materials, add salt water and epoxy resins break down. This was a known phenomenon to the community.
I am unfamiliar with any mechanism whereby salt water would degrade epoxy resins; theure used in marine environments all the time due to their chemical resistance. Albeit not at 6000 psi to my knowledge so maybe thats its.
 

Heartbreaker

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2006
5,347
7,063
136
I am unfamiliar with any mechanism whereby salt water would degrade epoxy resins; theure used in marine environments all the time due to their chemical resistance. Albeit not at 6000 psi to my knowledge so maybe thats its.

Same here. The main credible theory I have seen is carbon fiber is susceptible to cyclic fatigue. Each loading cycle introduces micro damage that accumulates leading to eventual failure.

CEO even mentioned their first CF Hull was showing signs and had to be de-rated:


Rush said tests that were conducted at the Deep Ocean Test Facility in Annapolis, Md., revealed that the Titan’s hull “showed signs of cyclic fatigue.” As a result, the hull’s depth rating was reduced to 3,000 meters.

“Not enough to get to the Titanic,” Rush said.

That meant the Titanic trips — which had been planned at first for 2018, then 2019, then 2020 — had to be put off until mid-2021. By that time, Rush expects the new submersibles to be ready to enter service. He said mission specialists who have paid more than $100,000 each to participate in the Titanic expeditions were “generally supportive but disappointed” by the delay.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uclaLabrat

skyking

Lifer
Nov 21, 2001
22,877
6,044
146
Yes, but the cyclic fatigue manifests itself differently than it does in simple bending or compression fatigue. The 6000 PSI water can end up between layers as the material breaks down. It's like you glued together a phone book and then worked it until the pages came back apart again.
Then picture of the same phenomena at the interface between the titanium and carbon fiber. It's going to try and peel that epoxy bond apart. It's a damned insidious failure mode.
That's why since the trieste and forward, All the other submersibles have been made out of homogenous materials and it worked.
I did a stint at Hexcel as a manufacturing
inspector.
They had some pretty big autoclaves there 25 ft in diameter and 60 ft long.
I recall they got up to about 350 PSI and a couple hundred degrees temperature. All the while they were applying vacuum to the assemblies to pull out any bubbles.
The goal with composite materials is to have as dry an assembly as possible with as little resin.
So you stuck it together with 350 PSI plus the vacuum plus the heat, and now mother nature's trying to pry it back apart with 6,000 psi.
I'm no expert in materials but you can see why people were concerned.
 
Last edited:

nOOky

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2004
3,318
2,417
136
Yes, but the cyclic fatigue manifests itself differently than it does in simple bending or compression fatigue. The 6000 PSI water can end up between layers as the material breaks down. It's like you glued together a phone book and then worked it until the pages came back apart again.
Then picture of the same phenomena at the interface between the titanium and carbon fiber. It's going to try and peel that epoxy bond apart. It's a damned insidious failure mode.
That's why since the trieste and forward, All the other submersibles have been made out of homogenous materials and it worked.
I did a stint at Hexcel as a manufacturing
inspector.
They had some pretty big autoclaves there 25 ft in diameter and 60 ft long.
I recall they got up to about 350 PSI and a couple hundred degrees temperature. All the while they were applying vacuum to the assemblies to pull out any bubbles.
The goal with composite materials is to have as dry an assembly as possible with as little resin.
So now you stuck it together with 350 PSI plus the vacuum plus the heat, and now mother nature's trying to pry it back apart with 6,000 psi.
I'm no expert in materials but you can see why people were concerned.

That's cool, we have used a lot of chopped carbon fiber over the years from Hexcel. I toured Trek many years ago when they were making their OCLV bike frames, which stands for "optimum compaction, low void". Anyway, if I were making any submersible regardless I'd chose to make it a sphere as that equalizes the load evenly throughout the hull, I'm not sure why they chose that shape. Maybe the lead engineer was a bicycle guy, carbon bicycle frames can be tuned directionally by aligning the fiber length to achieve the desired characteristics. They also handle millions of cycles of stress in certain directions, but never anything like what a submersible endures.
 
  • Like
Reactions: igor_kavinski