This is just what you all were waiting for, wasn't it?
When someone uses another person's fabrication as fact, that = ignorance. Okay, whatever. I realize it's fiction.Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: ThePresence
There are times he discusses ancient Jewish customs and rites which are complete fabrications. Also, when he talks about the Dead Sea scrolls, he displays his ignorance again. I don't want to get in to an in-depth discussion about it.Originally posted by: Doggiedog
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: ThePresence
I read the book. While it's an entertaining story, I found it extremely ignorant of even a basic understanding of Judaism. I attended an Orthodox Rabbincal seminary for 7 years, so I know a thing or two about it. Dan Brown doesn't have a clue. While I'm not as well versed in Christianity and it's dogma, it's safe to assume that he's just as ignorant.
You are just as bad as the Cardinal. It is a freaking book of fiction.![]()
I understand that. But most writers (yes, even FICTIOn writers) research their subject matter beforehand. Would I write a novel on the people of Madagascar and describe their customs in detail if I don't have a clue about them? I think that would be a bit strange. But hey, I thought the book was a fun story. Ignorant, but entertaining.
Also, what would Judaism have to do with the Da Vinci Code? Its about Catholicism. It doesn't need to go in depth about Judaism.
Why are you so certain that he is ignorant? Have you never told a story and changed some of the facts in order to make the story more enjoyable? This guy is not out to change the landscape of the Christian faith so I don't understand the problem here. Anyone with an internet connection can figure out that most of the stuff in that book is completely fictional. Just remember there is a distinct difference between ignorance and fabrication.
Okay, you got me.Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: ThePresence
I read it as fiction, I said I enjoyed it. I did find it ignorant though. When I read The Hobbit it's understood that it's a complete fabrication. I haven't run into any hobbits or cavetrolls recently, have you? I met a Jew AND a Christian yesterday! Hmmm...Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: ThePresence
I read the book. While it's an entertaining story, I found it extremely ignorant of even a basic understanding of Judaism. I attended an Orthodox Rabbincal seminary for 7 years, so I know a thing or two about it. Dan Brown doesn't have a clue. While I'm not as well versed in Christianity and it's dogma, it's safe to assume that he's just as ignorant.
You are just as bad as the Cardinal. It is a freaking book of fiction.![]()
I understand that. But most writers (yes, even FICTIOn writers) research their subject matter beforehand. Would I write a novel on the people of Madagascar and describe their customs in detail if I don't have a clue about them? I think that would be a bit strange. But hey, I thought the book was a fun story. Ignorant, but entertaining.
Of course he researched his subject and then purposely drew some false conclusions in order to create a story. If he followed the Bible completely what would be the point in the book?
It's not that he drew false conclusions, his basic understanding of the religious principals were flawed. But hey, enjoy the book! I know I did.
You sound just like my overly religious friends who read this book and could not read it as fiction. Once the word JESUS is invoked it becomes a religious crusade to discredit the author as much as possible.
But hey, at least scientists recently uncovered 'hobbits' so there is still a chance that Tolkien could have been right!
Actually scientists recently uncovered what appeared to be a 'hobbit-like' creature. Google.![]()
Originally posted by: ThePresence
When someone uses another person's fabrication as fact, that = ignorance. Okay, whatever. I realize it's fiction.Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: ThePresence
There are times he discusses ancient Jewish customs and rites which are complete fabrications. Also, when he talks about the Dead Sea scrolls, he displays his ignorance again. I don't want to get in to an in-depth discussion about it.Originally posted by: Doggiedog
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: ThePresence
I read the book. While it's an entertaining story, I found it extremely ignorant of even a basic understanding of Judaism. I attended an Orthodox Rabbincal seminary for 7 years, so I know a thing or two about it. Dan Brown doesn't have a clue. While I'm not as well versed in Christianity and it's dogma, it's safe to assume that he's just as ignorant.
You are just as bad as the Cardinal. It is a freaking book of fiction.![]()
I understand that. But most writers (yes, even FICTIOn writers) research their subject matter beforehand. Would I write a novel on the people of Madagascar and describe their customs in detail if I don't have a clue about them? I think that would be a bit strange. But hey, I thought the book was a fun story. Ignorant, but entertaining.
Also, what would Judaism have to do with the Da Vinci Code? Its about Catholicism. It doesn't need to go in depth about Judaism.
Why are you so certain that he is ignorant? Have you never told a story and changed some of the facts in order to make the story more enjoyable? This guy is not out to change the landscape of the Christian faith so I don't understand the problem here. Anyone with an internet connection can figure out that most of the stuff in that book is completely fictional. Just remember there is a distinct difference between ignorance and fabrication.
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: dabuddha
Originally posted by: ThePresence
I read the book. While it's an entertaining story, I found it extremely ignorant of even a basic understanding of Judaism. I attended an Orthodox Rabbincal seminary for 7 years, so I know a thing or two about it. Dan Brown doesn't have a clue. While I'm not as well versed in Christianity and it's dogma, it's safe to assume that he's just as ignorant.
You know what fiction is, right?
Yes. But he bases it on "facts". The so-called facts that he uses in this work of fiction is fiction itself.
Originally posted by: ATLien247
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
If I say what I would like to say about that guy then I will surely go to hell.
It's just a book.
And a book of fiction at that! :roll:
Originally posted by: ThePresence
When someone uses another person's fabrication as fact, that = ignorance. Okay, whatever. I realize it's fiction.Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: ThePresence
There are times he discusses ancient Jewish customs and rites which are complete fabrications. Also, when he talks about the Dead Sea scrolls, he displays his ignorance again. I don't want to get in to an in-depth discussion about it.Originally posted by: Doggiedog
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: ThePresence
I read the book. While it's an entertaining story, I found it extremely ignorant of even a basic understanding of Judaism. I attended an Orthodox Rabbincal seminary for 7 years, so I know a thing or two about it. Dan Brown doesn't have a clue. While I'm not as well versed in Christianity and it's dogma, it's safe to assume that he's just as ignorant.
You are just as bad as the Cardinal. It is a freaking book of fiction.![]()
I understand that. But most writers (yes, even FICTIOn writers) research their subject matter beforehand. Would I write a novel on the people of Madagascar and describe their customs in detail if I don't have a clue about them? I think that would be a bit strange. But hey, I thought the book was a fun story. Ignorant, but entertaining.
Also, what would Judaism have to do with the Da Vinci Code? Its about Catholicism. It doesn't need to go in depth about Judaism.
Why are you so certain that he is ignorant? Have you never told a story and changed some of the facts in order to make the story more enjoyable? This guy is not out to change the landscape of the Christian faith so I don't understand the problem here. Anyone with an internet connection can figure out that most of the stuff in that book is completely fictional. Just remember there is a distinct difference between ignorance and fabrication.
Originally posted by: tami
you'll always have critics who strongly urge against reading popular books. remember, harry potter is a bad series because it promotes witchcraft!
Archbishop
"You can find that book everywhere and the risk is that many people who read it believe that those fairy tales are real," he said. "I think I have the responsibility to clear things up to unmask the cheap lies contained in books like that."
Originally posted by: ThePresence
I read the book. While it's an entertaining story, I found it extremely ignorant of even a basic understanding of Judaism. I attended an Orthodox Rabbincal seminary for 7 years, so I know a thing or two about it. Dan Brown doesn't have a clue. While I'm not as well versed in Christianity and it's dogma, it's safe to assume that he's just as ignorant.
Originally posted by: CCCHeel
How true. Most of the ppl on these threads have nothing but a visceral hatred towards anything Christian because they 1) know nothing about true Christianianity and 2) are scared little boys searching for fulfillment in life.
This book is dangerous. Dan Brown uses half-truths and outright lies to promote the selling of his book, all the while basing his story on the backdrop of "fact". The danger is that ppl who don't know much about Christianity will be pushed towards believeing the venom his book spouts, even though he does call it a book of fiction. This false information is only exacerbated by the ignorance of most of the people reading this book (and consequently the ignorance of most of these Christian-bashers on this thread).
