0roo0roo
No Lifer
- Sep 21, 2002
- 64,795
- 84
- 91
Originally posted by: Vic
Of course I can't prove it. But unlike Siskel (God rest his soul), Ebert has never had any integrity with me. IMO, it was Siskel's integrity that Ebert has rested his whole career on. Ebert has simply given the thumbs up to too many very bad movies.Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
bull, sometimes i don't agree with him, but he's not paid off. prove it. i mean really, he's the top critic for a reason, people trust his integrity, if he were taking money on the sly...he'd be knocked off his high horse so fast by the other critics it would blow your mind. 2f2f was good dumb fun to me. i wasn't bored. which is more then i can say for many very truely bad movies.And Ebert takes more bribes than any other film critic in America. He in completely untrustworthy. I'll never forgive him for giving the thumbs up to 2F2F, and I didn't even see that pile of steaming sh!t in the theaters, I just rented it!
2F2F was not good dumb fun. It was a horrible movie. Beyond a bad screenplay, bad writing, bad directing, bad acting, and being entirely unrealistic, it glorified street racing in a way I cannot forgive. F&F was good dumb fun.
ugh, so basically you say he has no integrity because you disagree with some of his reviews. thats nice reasoning. and your critisisms of 2f2f all appy to f&f if thats your standard, so i don't see your point. to me the screenplay, writing, directing, acting was about all it had to be for that kind of movie.
