Originally posted by: PoPPeR
damn i was looking forward to that movie too
Originally posted by: PoPPeR
i didn't realize we had so many prophets here. You guys should go work for a Hollywood studio, you obviously know what films are going to be great and which are going to suck well ahead of time.
You see, when America is imperiled in a disaster film, it's the president to whom we turn as the moral compass.
Originally posted by: Kelvrick
Why would they ban the press?
Originally posted by: Hammer
Originally posted by: PoPPeR
i didn't realize we had so many prophets here. You guys should go work for a Hollywood studio, you obviously know what films are going to be great and which are going to suck well ahead of time.
the distaster films genre has been done to death. everything now is crap.
oh and dennis quaid
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: Kelvrick
Why would they ban the press?
Their reaction to the film was most likely very unfavorable.
Originally posted by: waggy
So the movie might remind people in NY or 9/11. because of the snow? WTF get over it already! if we have to cut out anything that MIGHT remind people of 9/11 its going to be a nightmare.
, then I just stopped. Making that 9/11 reference was totally unecessary and irrelevant.There's also a peculiar insensitivity, I think, to those of us who lived through September 11.
In "Day After," downtown New York, in an aerial view, is flooded with water and then snow. The whole thing resembles the billowing smoke that poured between the canyons of buildings on that horrible day from real life. Later, survivors are seen waving from rooftops of buildings, a grisly reminder of the tragic souls who made that mistake at the World Trade Center hoping for safety.
New Yorkers do not need to see our city in this condition, whether or not it's fantasy. I'd rather fly on the wings of soaring birds with Harry Potter than relive those grim images as entertainment.
Originally posted by: CorporateRecreation
lol you guys actually had hope for that disasterpiece