Libyan Unrest versus The Colonel

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
The King in Bahrain set the tone. I think this whole pan Arab revolution thing is petering out following this as a guide. Furthermore the other despots are prepared now by shoring up alliances and war gaming strategy and tactics.

Well really, hasn't history taught us that the people of the ME only respect force and brutality? Appear weak, or allow them democracy and they'll overthrow you and put a brutal autocrat in charge every time.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
All people. Germans didnt surrender and become passivists with sermons but we killed the fuck out of them ~ 20 million.
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
Well really, hasn't history taught us that the people of the ME only respect force and brutality? Appear weak, or allow them democracy and they'll overthrow you and put a brutal autocrat in charge every time.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Isn't the current history of the mid-east teaching us how incorrect Nebor is. Times and people change Nebor, that only thing seeming immutable and infinite is your stupidity.
 

bamacre

Lifer
Jul 1, 2004
21,029
2
81
Isn't the current history of the mid-east teaching us how incorrect Nebor is. Times and people change Nebor, that only thing seeming immutable and infinite is your stupidity.

:thumbsup:

But please get rid of your ---------'s. They are not needed. How long have you been posting here?
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Forgive me for intruding in on P&N, but how would UN sanctions be beneficial to anyone?

They would hurt poorest like always since the powers that be control distribution, which in turn, strengthens anti Americanism.

I heard they may try seizing bank accounts but that's only money and more where that comes from if the Col retains power so that will fail too.

What would do something is sending 10000 rangers and green berets in to take out the Col and his henchmen. But we usually don't do stuff like that because their is no profit in it and bloody separating friend or foe.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Forgive me for intruding in on P&N, but how would UN sanctions be beneficial to anyone?

Putting sanctions on countries like Italy which have been propping up Qaddafi would prevent them from sending emergency anti-protester weapons to be used against civilians. They're scared of their oil supply and hordes of refugees streaming over.

Remember when Rwanda had its genocide, the world failed to slap France with sanctions and they sent plane loads of machetes and weapons.

Recently, the French had some people in power with brains who stopped their foreign minister from sending a planeload of anti-civilian weapons to Tunisia during those riots, too.
 

irishScott

Lifer
Oct 10, 2006
21,562
3
0
They would hurt poorest like always since the powers that be control distribution, which in turn, strengthens anti Americanism.

I heard they may try seizing bank accounts but that's only money and more where that comes from if the Col retains power so that will fail too.

What would do something is sending 10000 rangers and green berets in to take out the Col and his henchmen. But we usually don't do stuff like that because their is no profit in it and bloody separating friend or foe.

And it's just not our business. I love how we toppled Saddam, by any measure an extremely brutal dictator who was probably worse than Gaddafi's ever been, and everyone screams about America's war for oil (just about one of the stupidest concepts on the planet) and wrongfully policing the world. Yet nearly 10 years after the fact they want us to go around and do exactly the latter.

So I guess it has to be poor oppressed Africans to justify an intervention. Everyone else is just fucked. :p
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
And it's just not our business. I love how we toppled Saddam, by any measure an extremely brutal dictator who was probably worse than Gaddafi's ever been, and everyone screams about America's war for oil (just about one of the stupidest concepts on the planet) and wrongfully policing the world. Yet nearly 10 years after the fact they want us to go around and do exactly the latter.

So I guess it has to be poor oppressed Africans to justify an intervention. Everyone else is just fucked. :p

confirming that the iraqi people were in open revolt and we went in there as liberators.

Your mind...












It's retarded.
 

irishScott

Lifer
Oct 10, 2006
21,562
3
0
confirming that the iraqi people were in open revolt and we went in there as liberators.

Your mind...












It's retarded.

No, but I'm pretty sure they were happy to see Saddam and his sons (who basically had free raping privileges) among other people go. Just a theory. Little theory there... ;)

And actually there was an Iraqi revolution shortly after the Gulf War. Saddam killed it. Literally.
 

XX55XX

Member
Mar 1, 2010
177
0
0
I predict that Gaddafi will likely prevail in the end. These protesters and army deserters only have light weaponry, and their hold on the eastern part of the country is extremely tenuous. It will be a matter of time before Gaddafi strikes back:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/24/world/africa/24rebels.html?hp

It will be bloody, and the international community will voice words of "grave concern," but until it takes action, the rebellion is likely to be crushed.
 

Howard

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
47,982
11
81
I predict that Gaddafi will likely prevail in the end. These protesters and army deserters only have light weaponry, and their hold on the eastern part of the country is extremely tenuous. It will be a matter of time before Gaddafi strikes back:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/24/world/africa/24rebels.html?hp

It will be bloody, and the international community will voice words of "grave concern," but until it takes action, the rebellion is likely to be crushed.
Isn't the UN supposed to prevent genocide?
 

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
Mostly unarmed citzens in all these nations successfully revolting, police and military refusing to attack citizens, etc.

And lefties still think we don't need private guns in the US because citizens would be crushed anyway (the classic leftie "hand guns won't save you from US tanks and jets" argument). LMAO. These guys did it without many guns, so imagine how much quicker it would be over if they were stock piling like US citizens and not having to retreat temporarily because of a couple riot shields and smoke grenades from a few loyalists "just doing their job".
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
I'm as pro gun as you get EX but introducing guns lets central gov'ts get real punitive with real weapons like gas, bombs, etc. You better be prepared to go all the way and have a real chance of winning. e.g. copting military at some point because weapons today can destroy whole cities in seconds.
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
Since Kaddafi can no longer rely on his army, he has been hiring all the mercenaries he can get. Therefore, if Kaddafi's ability to pay those mercenaries can be restricted by various entities freezing his money, ole Kaddafi could find himself in a position of being able to longer pay the mercenaries. In which case we may never learn which bloodshot was Kaddafi's. Or one his hired mercenaries may decide to take over, because they think they can defuse the crisis.

In short, I am not bullish on the future of Kaddafi, and Kaddafi has lost everyone's respect.
 

PottedMeat

Lifer
Apr 17, 2002
12,363
475
126
Since Kaddafi can no longer rely on his army, he has been hiring all the mercenaries he can get. Therefore, if Kaddafi's ability to pay those mercenaries can be restricted by various entities freezing his money, ole Kaddafi could find himself in a position of being able to longer pay the mercenaries. In which case we may never learn which bloodshot was Kaddafi's. Or one his hired mercenaries may decide to take over, because they think they can defuse the crisis.

In short, I am not bullish on the future of Kaddafi, and Kaddafi has lost everyone's respect.

now that he's using mercenaries he better win, if they lose every one of his supporters will probably be shot.
 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
What is the distribution of oil resources in Libya like - spread all over or concentrated in specific regions? If east Libya remains "free", what's their economic outlook going to be like?
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Since Kaddafi can no longer rely on his army, he has been hiring all the mercenaries he can get. Therefore, if Kaddafi's ability to pay those mercenaries can be restricted by various entities freezing his money, ole Kaddafi could find himself in a position of being able to longer pay the mercenaries. In which case we may never learn which bloodshot was Kaddafi's. Or one his hired mercenaries may decide to take over, because they think they can defuse the crisis.

In short, I am not bullish on the future of Kaddafi, and Kaddafi has lost everyone's respect.

Meh no issue. Pay em in bullion. not everyone is stupid enough to all eggs in Western bankers basket. In Islamic world Gold is still hoarded goes to religion as well as mistrust.