Libya: U.N. Security Council to support action short of invasion

Page 11 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

freegeeks

Diamond Member
May 7, 2001
5,460
1
81
Canoworms and RabidWhatever must be again crying today because US and Europe stand it again as allies, just like they do in Afghanistan and in countless other operations. Both of you can make up sh*t all you want, but the reality shows the US and Europe are the most loyal allies, despite our disagreements. This must be really hurtfull for the both of you. Maybe India will sent some fighters?
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
You are a sick puppy. I have never seen this level of fail-dancing on your part. This is a lot of fun though. People have disagreements over Europe, but you're on another planet. Today's events just show how wrong your beliefs are and you are having a break down and talking about turning Libyans into luggage. LOL. Don't interact with any Europeans or white people today, you might stab them in the back because you're so angry.

LOL, you are really going out of control now! It's so entertaining watching you break down.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Canoworms and RabidWhatever must be again crying today because US and Europe stand it again as allies, just like they do in Afghanistan and in countless other operations. Both of you can make up sh*t all you want, but the reality shows the US and Europe are the most loyal allies, despite our disagreements. This must be really hurtfull for the both of you. Maybe India will sent some fighters?

Sorry, but I have a different viewpoint, especially given Germany's role in the UN. It must be hurtful for you to have the European leader abstain.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Canoworms and RabidWhatever must be again crying today because US and Europe stand it again as allies, just like they do in Afghanistan and in countless other operations. Both of you can make up sh*t all you want, but the reality shows the US and Europe are the most loyal allies, despite our disagreements. This must be really hurtfull for the both of you. Maybe India will sent some fighters?

The US and Europe are allies, but the US will stand up against Europe whenever it commits or attempts to commit genocide. We've already had to step into Europe during the 90's when Europeans were committing genocide in Europe itself. We'll stand up against Europe again when they inevitably get out of control.

What the hell is India even going to do? They abstained from the UN Security Council vote. They're going to do nothing. They would probably do nothing even if Europe was able to enact its entire agenda and commit genocide. Maybe in 10-20 years India will be able to do something as it rises in prominence and Europe continues its decline.
 

RbSX

Diamond Member
Jan 18, 2002
8,351
1
76
The US and Europe are allies, but the US will stand up against Europe whenever it commits or attempts to commit genocide. We've already had to step into Europe during the 90's when Europeans were committing genocide in Europe itself. We'll stand up against Europe again when they inevitably get out of control.

What the hell is India even going to do? They abstained from the UN Security Council vote. They're going to do nothing. They would probably do nothing even if Europe was able to enact its entire agenda and commit genocide. Maybe in 10-20 years India will be able to do something as it rises in prominence and Europe continues its decline.

Just.... wow.
 

freegeeks

Diamond Member
May 7, 2001
5,460
1
81
Sorry, but I have a different viewpoint, especially given Germany's role in the UN. It must be hurtful for you to have the European leader abstain.

"We fully endorse the aims of the resolution. Our attitude can't be mixed up with neutrality," she said. Germany's foreign and defense ministers are in talks with NATO to see whether it could take over other tasks , Mrs. Merkel said"
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
The US and Europe are allies, but the US will stand up against Europe whenever it commits or attempts to commit genocide. We've already had to step into Europe during the 90's when Europeans were committing genocide in Europe itself. We'll stand up against Europe again when they inevitably get out of control.

What the hell is India even going to do? They abstained from the UN Security Council vote. They're going to do nothing. They would probably do nothing even if Europe was able to enact its entire agenda and commit genocide. Maybe in 10-20 years India will be able to do something as it rises in prominence and Europe continues its decline.

:thumbsup:
 

Pocatello

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 1999
9,754
2
76
How much oil did the Libyan freedom fighters promise to the French for this little adventure?
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
"We fully endorse the aims of the resolution. Our attitude can't be mixed up with neutrality," she said. Germany's foreign and defense ministers are in talks with NATO to see whether it could take over other tasks , Mrs. Merkel said"

Abstain: Germany, Russia, China, India, Brazil

Great company there!
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
LOL, you are really going out of control now! It's so entertaining watching you break down.

Uh oh CanOWorms is doing the parrot dance where he just repeats everything like he's in kintergarden because he's not smart enough to think of anything original. Look, I don't want to upset you anymore because honestly if you live in the USA I fear that you may take out your racial hatred on innocent people today given current events. So I'm going to leave you be and you can talk to the wind about luggage made out of humans. But maybe you should go to Libya and warn them about the real cannibalistic intentions of the French. They'd probably kill you as suspected government agent!
 

Dominato3r

Diamond Member
Aug 15, 2008
5,109
1
0
I agree, everyone can play a role...helping out Libyans and keeping European armies in check is important. However, 6 fighters? That can maybe take out 1 tank and accidentally kill 2 goats. Canada has failed in this international effort.

You fail to recognize that we're contributing more than just six fighters.
 

speg

Diamond Member
Apr 30, 2000
3,681
3
76
www.speg.com
What a mistake this is. And I'm typically a very hawkish individual.

Why is that? I find it so weird, I am getting the impression that the normally hawkish are against this. I am normally not hawkish at all and yet I find myself in full support today's actions.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
You fail to recognize that we're contributing more than just six fighters.

All in all, it's all very little. Canada has failed in this operation and has shown that it is about as relevant as Mongolia on the global stage. Truly an irrelevant country. This was an opportunity to step up and show that Canadians care more about issues other than softwood lumber issues, hockey, and whatever other US related issues that Canadians have, but instead Canadians show how truly selfish they are with this truly weak show of force.

Shame on Canada.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Uh oh CanOWorms is doing the parrot dance where he just repeats everything like he's in kintergarden because he's not smart enough to think of anything original. Look, I don't want to upset you anymore because honestly if you live in the USA I fear that you may take out your racial hatred on innocent people today given current events. So I'm going to leave you be and you can talk to the wind about luggage made out of humans. But maybe you should go to Libya and warn them about the real cannibalistic intentions of the French. They'd probably kill you as suspected government agent!

I was going to suggest that you go to Libya, but then I realized that you would probably kill them all to purify the world of those you deem to be undesirables. But maybe that's different now. That's what so strange about your position here. Normally you want to kill all non-whites. So many of your threads are also about Arab culture and how it sucks. It's very interesting to see you completely change. I'm glad. I hope that the forum sees a new compassionate Infohawk, one who has thrown away bigotry.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
All in all, it's all very little. Canada has failed in this operation and has shown that it is about as relevant as Mongolia on the global stage. Truly an irrelevant country. This was an opportunity to step up and show that Canadians care more about softwood lumber issues, hockey, and whatever other US related issues that Canadians have, but instead Canadians show how truly selfish they are with this truly weak show of force.

Shame on Canada.

It's especially magnified given their self-declared great history of humanitarian peacekeeping. It's only the beginning though.
 

freegeeks

Diamond Member
May 7, 2001
5,460
1
81
I was going to suggest that you go to Libya, but then I realized that you would probably kill them all to purify the world of those you deem to be undesirables. But maybe that's different now. That's what so strange about your position here. Normally you want to kill all non-whites. So many of your threads are also about Arab culture and how it sucks. It's very interesting to see you completely change. I'm glad. I hope that the forum sees a new compassionate Infohawk, one who has thrown away bigotry.

like always, the only bigots in these threads are you and Rabidmongoose
 

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
Why is that? I find it so weird, I am getting the impression that the normally hawkish are against this. I am normally not hawkish at all and yet I find myself in full support today's actions.

Because we have NO national interest in Libya. Our European allies have energy and migration related interests in Libya. We're getting involved in a situation that is none of our business, and has no possible benefit for the United States. Our debt is spiraling out of control, and we're firing half million dollar missiles into Libya to stop a fight that's pretty much already over. And how long are we going to maintain a no-fly zone once the fighting stops? 6 months? A year?

The reason the typically hawkish are against this is because we're realists, and we don't think with our hearts. I couldn't care less if every single person in Libya was killed in their civil war, because all of their lives combined isn't worth one USN pilot. And they're not worth the expense to the US tax payer incurred from firing Tomahawks into this mess. We secured OUR oil\energy flow by occupying and stabilizing Iraq. We're now securing France's future oil\energy flow by getting involved in Libya. Anyone remember how much the French helped us with Iraq? Oh, that's right, they didn't.
 

Dominato3r

Diamond Member
Aug 15, 2008
5,109
1
0
All in all, it's all very little. Canada has failed in this operation and has shown that it is about as relevant as Mongolia on the global stage. Truly an irrelevant country. This was an opportunity to step up and show that Canadians care more about issues other than softwood lumber issues, hockey, and whatever other US related issues that Canadians have, but instead Canadians show how truly selfish they are with this truly weak show of force.

Shame on Canada.

Lol Alright :\
 

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
All in all, it's all very little. Canada has failed in this operation and has shown that it is about as relevant as Mongolia on the global stage. Truly an irrelevant country. This was an opportunity to step up and show that Canadians care more about issues other than softwood lumber issues, hockey, and whatever other US related issues that Canadians have, but instead Canadians show how truly selfish they are with this truly weak show of force.

Shame on Canada.

I'm not sure what all the anti-Canada hate is about. Have you looked at how many Canadians are dying in Afghanistan? Because they have the highest per soldier casualty rate in ISAF. I personally believe that's due to inadequate training and support of the Canadian Army, but they're still in the fight and they're still dying for a cause that is at best tangentially related to their national interest. To mock one of our greatest allies for being a great ally seems beyond ridiculous. Personally I feel bad that they're sending any fighters to Libya, because they almost certainly wouldn't have gotten involved in this mess if we hadn't led them into it (as usual.)
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
It's especially magnified given their self-declared great history of humanitarian peacekeeping. It's only the beginning though.

I think that only a Canadian would say that Canada has a great history of humanitarianism. This issue of 6 fighters is basically proof that Canada has no interest in anything but Canada and random US-Canada issues.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
What a mistake this is. And I'm typically a very hawkish individual.

Why is that? I find it so weird, I am getting the impression that the normally hawkish are against this. I am normally not hawkish at all and yet I find myself in full support today's actions.

In nebors mind we have arabs killing arabs. And that is good to him. So his reasons for being against this have everything to do with maximizing arab deaths and nothing to do with money.

Nebor has friends who have killed civies in Iraq. He has probably done this himself. He is psycho.