It all depends on what you go looking for. Most brands have had some sort of problem over the years. I've driven Fords my whole life because they've always worked. I get 12 to 15 years and at least a quarter million miles out of them. My wifes Escape is 18 years old, still looks great and runs fine. I expect it to easily last another five years.
Toyota's reputation for reliability has never been proven to me. The folks I know that own them appear to have as many repairs as any other brand.
It's truly important to examine things model by model, and sometimes you just get plain unlucky.
With Ford, the Focus 2012+ got a new DCT, which has been absolutely plagued by issues and failures. The manual transmission units on the other hand are quite good overall. This resulted in massive financial impact against Ford in a segment not all that profitable to begin with, and it seems they took the wrong lessons from that by choosing to abadon the car segment entirely in lieu of more profitable heavier and more expensive/less efficient trucks and SUVs.
That kind of thinking I think makes them unbelievably vulnerable to any significant market corrections that will inevitably occur at some point down the line. Indeed this very year might see a market implosion of sorts. It's a bad situation even when you're prepared, but if customers are suddenly running away from guzzlers and $40-$80k Trucks and SUVs, your company is going to look pretty damn idiotic in that scenario, without even a fallback revenue maker. Adding to that a sort of mini-subprime time bomb to go with it by being so closely tied to the finance side of it. Yes, in good times you can fatten those CEO zeros, but the flip side is that if a large enough percentage of those people you've sold 5, 6, and even 8 year notes on overpriced guzzlers to can't or won't pay the notes, then you're holding a triple whammy :
No new vehicles that appeal to budget minded consumers
Huge, expensive inventory of unwanted vehicles
Torrent of failing auto loans
A 2008-style market correction would have a high chance of ending Ford in today's market. They were the lucky one last time, having both appealing budget vehicles as well as just having gotten solid financials done before the catastrophe.
But yes, any maker can have some terrible models or even selections within a single model. I had a 2012 Scion TC 6MT. The second gen TC, based on the international Toyota Avensis. The 2.4l i4 was fine and no significant issues. Unfortunately for me, the 6MT units, about 10% of the TC2s sold, had a ridiculously stupid thin plastic throwout bearing, and a defective design on the input shaft bearing, which caused most of the manual shift models to fail between 40-60k miles. If you didn't disassemble the transmission before the input shaft bearing failed, it would destroy the transmission gearing. On mine, as I drive very easy on manual cars in my old age, achieved 160k miles on it before it failed. There was a TSB acknowledging the failure between Toyota service personnel, but they didn't put out a recall because it was too rare of a model to get the necessary attention. So I had a friend's auto shop help me put in a used transmission, which unfortunately for me still had the OEM input shaft bearing inside it, which failed again less than 5k miles later.
For someone who bought the car to use as a long term daily to combine with the highest maintenance standards, this was obviously quite disappointing. I would have been better off with the automatic variant, just as Focus 2012+ owners are better off with the manual variants. Impossible to know these things with the latest models that haven't seen the exact drivetrains put through widespread public use in longer term observation.
I hope we see more sensible i4, 5/6MT and non-CVT/DCT basic autos designed and released which target 35-50mpg, and don't fall prey to overcomplication and overpricing. The best car I've owned this century has been a 2008 Focus S 2.0 i4 5MT Coupe. Incredibly reliable 42-45mpg on highway, 35+mpg mixed, and all it ever needed in 200k+ miles was gas, oil, tires, and brakes. Car was about 10k new and didn't screw around with extraneous nonsense. Not for everyone, but that kind of option should not be skipped entirely by makers.