SF or LA

  • San Francisco

  • Los Angeles

  • Neither/Other


Results are only viewable after voting.

Capt Caveman

Lifer
Jan 30, 2005
34,543
651
126
We're deciding between the two to relocate to. Both have pros and cons. I have family in both, she has a lot in Santa Monica(where I'm flying out to in a couple of weeks to interview). I know a lot of folks live out there. Thought I'd see what others thought.
 
Last edited:

Drako

Lifer
Jun 9, 2007
10,697
161
106
If you are talking about living in LA or SF proper, I would say neither. I live in the San Jose area, and prefer not living "in the city".
 

Slew Foot

Lifer
Sep 22, 2005
12,379
96
86
If you are talking about living in LA or SF proper, I would say neither. I live in the San Jose area, and prefer not living "in the city".

This times a billion. The city themselves are trash. The surrounding surburbs are much nicer.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
LA if you want to maximize the advantages of the big city (more restaurant, cultural, and similar options), and more diversity in neighborhoods and cultures, and better climate. SF if you prefer less shallow people (but more eccentrics/crazies politically), more natural beauty, and less sprawl.
 

uclaLabrat

Diamond Member
Aug 2, 2007
5,632
3,045
136
I wouldn't live in either city if possible...but I'd pick LA. Head north from calabasas to camarillo or south from torrance to huntington beach if you can.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,586
986
126
I wouldn't live in either city if possible...but I'd pick LA. Head north from calabasas to camarillo or south from torrance to huntington beach if you can.

Commuting from Huntington Beach to Santa Monica would be an absolute bitch. No way I would make that drive.

My best advice would be to find somewhere decent that is close to where you work because long commutes suck.

Oh, and avoid the Valley. It is like an oven there during the summer. Seriously, it is like 10-15 degrees hotter there than it will be along the coast.
 

Oyeve

Lifer
Oct 18, 1999
22,071
885
126
Neither. West coast sucks ass.


J/K,

If it was only those 2 I would say SF, better chinese food.
 

Capt Caveman

Lifer
Jan 30, 2005
34,543
651
126
Commuting from Huntington Beach to Santa Monica would be an absolute bitch. No way I would make that drive.

My best advice would be to find somewhere decent that is close to where you work because long commutes suck.

How bikeable is it in LA for commuting? Within a ten mile range, I would bike to work if possible.
 

uclaLabrat

Diamond Member
Aug 2, 2007
5,632
3,045
136
Commuting from Huntington Beach to Santa Monica would be an absolute bitch. No way I would make that drive.

My best advice would be to find somewhere decent that is close to where you work because long commutes suck.

Oh, and avoid the Valley. It is like an oven there during the summer. Seriously, it is like 10-15 degrees hotter there than it will be along the coast.
Depends on what hours you go in, but I did costa mesa to westwood for 4 years. It did take some sanity out of me.
 

xSkyDrAx

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2003
7,706
1
0
Another vote for L.A but mainly for the suburbs around it. There's a ton of diversity and stuff to do in the vicinity that you don't and won't likely stick in the city. Also if you plan to live in SF it's like LA but crazier in terms of lay out and that it's stacked on a mass of hills and traffic in the city is insane.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,586
986
126
How bikeable is it in LA for commuting? Within a ten mile range, I would bike to work if possible.

Depends on how brave you are. It's doable but it depends on the route and how comfortable you are mixing it up with drivers who don't give a shit about you let alone see you.

Marina del Rey is nice, expensive, but anywhere on the West Side will be expensive. I liked L.A. but it is just too crowded there now. I'm much happier in San Diego.