Paratus
Lifer
- Jun 4, 2004
- 17,691
- 15,939
- 146
The assailant should be supplied due process, prosecuted and punished per the law assuming he’s found guilty.
I’m more interested in the fact that neither victim nor assailant was armed with a gun and both are still alive and relatively unharmed.
I thought it was unpossible to protect yourself from violence without a gun?
Plus the real question here was why didn’t the assailant have a gun? Why isn’t anyone asking whether CAs draconian gun laws infringed on this guys 2A rights. He should have been allowed to be armed until he was t a responsible gun owner anymore.
/s
I’m more interested in the fact that neither victim nor assailant was armed with a gun and both are still alive and relatively unharmed.
I thought it was unpossible to protect yourself from violence without a gun?
Plus the real question here was why didn’t the assailant have a gun? Why isn’t anyone asking whether CAs draconian gun laws infringed on this guys 2A rights. He should have been allowed to be armed until he was t a responsible gun owner anymore.
/s
