Now that I've fired a Glock 17, it just conforms my initial belief there was any mistake. But legal system can't take "what are you really thinking" in account...or at least the jurors are ignorant bunch of people who never touched a gun.
Glocks have a sight arrangement where there is a front and right sight that needs to be lined up with the eye. The body is very bumpy. The holding technique is also something that beginners can be extremely sloppy with; fingers are not supposed to go in the trigger area until ready. Where the finger contacts the trigger matters, the middle the the print is where people should start out at and adjust until they eliminate pulling the gun to the right or left when shooting. But she fired pretty much a perfect shot and point blank range; she moved closer because that reduces the chances of the bullet missing his vitals even without an ideal stance.
What is missing is where the finger was when drawing the gun. It should not be in the trigger area because that can cause an accidental discharge to the wrong places(like Plaxico Buress). It should have been in the smooth indented section on the top of the Glock. By the time the video catches that, she's absolutely ready to fire based on the finger in the trigger area.
Gun training is ultimately all calibrating good aim at rapid speed, and it's a given that cops spend plenty of time at the range precisely so they are ready in the field.
I have no time to review all the footage of the trial but I suspect the prosecution didn't get into the sordid details of basic gun training, tactile feedback, etc because obviously, they don't want everyone to know how hold a Glock properly. The press(on all sides) obviously didn't let that out either. The reds would be afraid that public opinion on cops would turn if populace knew just how much time they spend at the range and just how detailed work it requires to fire a gun accurately. The blues were stuck in the racism narrative and not emphasizing that any cop can do the exact same bullshit Potter did and often get away with it.
Other important details
The police have better barrels than consumer guns. The gun I used jammed on me twice because my grip was loose. If you don't pull the top of the Glock gun back all the way to release the trigger for reuse, nothing gets fired.
For newbs, the isosceles stance is what gets taught first. For a cop with years of time, and ranges happy to take their money, they can get far more training in shooting in less than ideal stances.
This just because I suddenly have the need to get a gun in the future in conjunction with some non lethal weapons to eliminate threats for good under my own terms since law enforcement is essentially useless for that purpose except in very rare circumstances. But MD requires getting an HQL to legally get a gun.
Wright is also a piece of shit who kinda deserved to die on a moral level, but legally, he was stripped of his "right" to live a life, no matter how harmful it was to others.
Also, nurmoerus criminals go through the system and get away with. A experienced officer would eventually learn all the techniques the criminals and defense lawyers utilized in court to block prosecution. Dissemination of outcomes can be further spread through mere office chatter.
The obvious inference is that while Potter was shouting Taser, she was using the sight system of the Glock to hit Wright right in the vital area. Since she is trained, that's all the time she needed.
With the way Wright's arms were flailing about, and that it wasn't straight on, I have my doubts the Taser would have hit him in the right places.
Holster draw is something that requires its own training.
Damage for the lesson was $220. Cheaper, slower options were available, but with what happened to me, I'm not going to wait an extra three weeks on top of month for the permit to buy arrive.
Then I have to get a wear and carry permit...and then that takes 90 days to process.