• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

"Killing is [morally] fine" Discuss

Page 16 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Is Killing fine?

  • Yes

  • No

  • In self defence

Results are only viewable after voting.
Neckbeard why do you think killing in self defense is justified? All life is precious I thought, why should yours even in defense be more valuable than theirs? Obviously you should just keel over and die because who knows maybe after the trial, if they catch the guy, and he spends sometime in jail, if he's convicted, he could reform and get his life together.
 
bfdd said:
Neckbeard why do you think killing in self defense is justified? All life is precious I thought, why should yours even in defense be more valuable than theirs? Obviously you should just keel over and die because who knows maybe after the trial, if they catch the guy, and he spends sometime in jail, if he's convicted, he could reform and get his life together.
Click to expand...

Because I have a more personal connection to my life, therefore I am aware of it's value, someone who i've never met, I'm not aware of the value of their life, in terms of it's potential and a value is greater than an unknown.
 
HAL9000 said:
Because I have a more personal connection to my life, therefore I am aware of it's value, someone who i've never met, I'm not aware of the value of their life, in terms of it's potential and a value is greater than an unknown.
Click to expand...

That exact justification can be used for killing anything for any reason. So you're going to have to do better than that.
 
HAL9000 said:
Because I have a more personal connection to my life, therefore I am aware of it's value, someone who i've never met, I'm not aware of the value of their life, in terms of it's potential and a value is greater than an unknown.
Click to expand...

So you finally admit we're right...the value of our family/selves lives is worth more than a criminal you've never met. The value of our lives is worth more than the unknown I tentions of an intruder in my home...it's amazing you actually admitted it
:sneaky:
 
corwin said:
So you finally admit we're right...the value of our family/selves lives is worth more than a criminal you've never met. The value of our lives is worth more than the unknown I tentions of an intruder in my home...it's amazing you actually admitted it
:sneaky:
Click to expand...

I've always said that my life and my families life is worth more than the life of a criminal. Always.
 
MikeMike said:
I have no idea what the value of your life is, So i value it less than the price of a gun and a bullet... i shoot you... according to what you said, that makes it morally fine.
Click to expand...

No it doesn't. What I said was that I value my life over the value of an unknowns life, so when the choice is between the two I pick mine. That doesn't mean that the unknowns life isn't worth anything, or that I can kill anyone for any reason. I still think that all life has value.
 
HAL9000 said:
I've always said that my life and my families life is worth more than the life of a criminal. Always.
Click to expand...

No you keep saying that guy breaking in your window could be there for any reason, maybe just needs a cup of sugar, so you're gonna just have a chat with him and risk all your lives rather than just putting him down thereby guaranteeing all of your more valuable lives. You can't have it both ways. If a criminals life is worth less than yours and your families why would you put them at ANY risk by not killing them as soon as they break in which poses a threat?
 
corwin said:
No you keep saying that guy breaking in your window could be there for any reason, maybe just needs a cup of sugar, so you're gonna just have a chat with him and risk all your lives rather than just putting him down thereby guaranteeing all of your more valuable lives. You can't have it both ways. If a criminals life is worth less than yours and your families why would you put them at ANY risk by not killing them as soon as they break in which poses a threat?
Click to expand...

Why assume he poses a threat to their lives?
 
HAL9000 said:
Why assume he poses a threat to their lives?
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter if I think he poses a threat. I already value his life less than the second he made me waste to ponder if he's a threat. This is the same logic you just used to come to the conclusion they should be killed.
 
HAL9000 said:
That's a dangerous assumption to make.
Click to expand...

It's dangerous to you and you're family to assume he isn't, it's only dangerous to him, a criminal who chose to break the law and take his chances, if you assume he is...so again, which is more valuable, whose life would you rather risk by assumption, yours or his?
 
bfdd said:
It doesn't matter if I think he poses a threat. I already value his life less than the second he made me waste to ponder if he's a threat. This is the same logic you just used to come to the conclusion they should be killed.
Click to expand...

No it's not, I made the distinction that when choosing between the two lives, his life has less of a value to me than my own or that of my families. When he enters the house I'm not choosing between lives.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top