i actually got denied by kickstarter on a lulz project i wanted to start. i wanted to make a line of clothes for fatties
Calling them fatties in your proposal probably didn't help
i actually got denied by kickstarter on a lulz project i wanted to start. i wanted to make a line of clothes for fatties
Really? There have been lots of OP ownage threads here.
Not sure whether OP's point is more funny or pitiful.
I think its pretty funny how everyone here thinks my post is "fail".
Its such a simple business concept that people who give money to Quickstarter ignore.
I guess all of those billionaire venture capitalists in silicon valley have it all wrong. They should be giving away their money for free. Right.
well, VC is clearly one way of financing a business... clearly, KS is just another way of financing a business...
Oh, don't get me wrong, its a great model for a business trying to raise money but anyone donating money to one of these companies is being very stupid.
I think its pretty funny how everyone here thinks my post is "fail".
Its such a simple business concept that people who give money to Quickstarter ignore.
I guess all of those billionaire venture capitalists in silicon valley have it all wrong. They should be giving away their money for free. Right.
I've read some horror stories about it. Most recently the iphone *metal* case that was made and interfered with the antenna, along with that lock picking one.
But not all is bad. I've backed three projects in kickstarter and all three have come through. I cannot WAIT for my pen type-a to come in the mail. And I picked up a sweet, unique set of Game of Thrones posters as well, and I supported the Girl Walk All Day movie too.
Oh, don't get me wrong, its a great model for a business trying to raise money but anyone donating money to one of these companies is being very stupid.
Its internet panhandeling.
Oh, don't get me wrong, its a great model for a business trying to raise money but anyone donating money to one of these companies is being very stupid.
Its internet panhandeling.
Oh, don't get me wrong, its a great model for a business trying to raise money but anyone donating money to one of these companies is being very stupid.
Its internet panhandeling.
Inventor John has a design for product A that he's ready to bring to market, but CEO Bob at StingyInvestments and ShitEconomy Partners LLC doesn't want to fund him. Neither do any of the other VCs John has been to.
I like the idea of product A and want one. Now I can either live without product A because no VCs will fund it, and so John can't get any start-up money. Or I can contribute to John's Kickstarter and receive the desired product in return when it's finished and shipping, often at less than the eventual street price.
I fail to see the stupid in that. This is exactly what's going on with DoubleFine's game. Ignore the fact that it's a development studio and not a single inventor. The result to me, the consumer, is the same....except I'd wager that $15 for the game and a documentary is a fuck-ton less expensive than if they had to release through a publisher like EA.
You seem to think that the "investors" aren't getting anything in return?
So you are taking all of the risk with no return on your investment vs the company owner has takes almost no risk and reaps all of the reward.
why are you not okay with this?
clearly everyone else involved IS okay with that arrangement.
I am also perplexed as to why 75% of the posts by people who always think they are the smartest person in the room cannot come up with any real argument other than basis personal attacks.
I guess when you cannot attack an argument on its merits you have to play the race card of the internet.
Keep digging, if you keep this up we may solve our oil import problems.
Not saying I am not ok with it, people are free to piss away their money however they see fit, but it is a pretty stupid to not get any return on your investment while taking on all of the risk.
Inventor John has a design for product A that he's ready to bring to market, but CEO Bob at StingyInvestments and ShitEconomy Partners LLC doesn't want to fund him. Neither do any of the other VCs John has been to.
I like the idea of product A and want one. Now I can either live without product A because no VCs will fund it, and so John can't get any start-up money. Or I can contribute to John's Kickstarter and receive the desired product in return when it's finished and shipping, often at less than the eventual street price.
I fail to see the stupid in that. This is exactly what's going on with DoubleFine's game. Ignore the fact that it's a development studio and not a single inventor. The result to me, the consumer, is the same....except I'd wager that $15 for the game and a documentary is a fuck-ton less expensive than if they had to release through a publisher like EA.
oh, don't get me wrong, you are a fucking idiot. There is NO panhandling.
Exactly. You have added NOTHING to this thread.
