Printer Bandit
Lifer
- Mar 16, 2005
- 13,856
- 109
- 106
Yea - one's a movie (cinema) and the other's a game. All cinema is art. Games are not.
Is the Giants / Dodgers game being played right now art? Was the Cleveland / Chicago game earlier today art? In the case of video games...video games are played. Because they're fun. Yes, they share similarities to movies, but so does professional sports (plots, characters, acting, etc.).
Hey, this Tekzilla show isn't too bad... and it's got ol' Patty Norton!
Big Daddy + hit girl -> play on Batman and Robin
"wait till they get a load of me"
so the mobster's kid is like the Joker?!
anyone read the kick ass comics? the movie follows it pretty closely.
Ehhh. I didn't like what they did with (spoilers removed just to be safe).
But my friends who'd never read the comics enjoyed the movie, so.
IMO I don't think the comic story would have went over quite as well as what they did here and I really enjoyed the supplemental ending.
She looks 13 there and that skirt is inappropiate. We live in sad world that would look at this young girl in some kind of sexual manner. I can see a teenage boy her age, but for grown men to be lusting after her is sick.
i agree. wtf is going on here?!
what happened w/kaitie?
I did not find the film offensive at all. There are countless films that push the boundaries much farther than Kick Ass ever does. Heck, even a movie like Let The Right One In is more disturbing in many ways.
Not sure if you've only seen the movie or just read the comic. I'm just going off of what I can remember when I read the wikipedia page, but...
In the movie, Katie ends up being Kick-Ass's girlfriend, where in the comics, after Kick-Ass reveals himself to her, her current boyfriend just beats him up. In the movie, Big Daddy ends up dying by the mobsters during the whole interrogation thing, but in the comic, Big Daddy gets interrogated and it's revealed that he's not an ex-cop but some accountant or something like that.
I don't find it offensive at all either, but I guess some people can't separate the reality (just actors...) from the make-believe. I'm actually quite disappointed in Ebert (who I find to usually be a pretty good critic) in that he let some silly moral ideal get in the way of truly reviewing this film. I mean, he actually sat there blabbing on about how the character "shows no remorse." Ebert... it's a fucking make-believe character from a violent comic book... MAKE-BELIEVE. Just because the character is a young (minor) female does not magically make it any different.
Some people just have an odd sense of purity/innocence. I wonder what would happen if you told Ebert that kids younger than 13 are having sex these days... he'd probably go insane.
