• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Kerry/Edwards 2004!!!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
In retrosprect the choice later might turn out to be a mistake.

If Ohio is the ultimate state to win (both sides think so)......Gephardt may have been the better choice.

But we'll never know.
 
Originally posted by: arsbanned
The south, very likely will be the battleground.

If you recall though, Edwards didn't do all that well in the South in the Primaries. Anyway, not to rain on the parade. I'm just trying to maintain a cautious approach. 😀

IIRC, Edwards did not do that well in the Primaries at all. But, I think he, as VP, will not hurt Kerry.
 
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Whoa! 22 minutes!

Longer than expected. Of course Galt isn't the one I was looking for. 😀

That came a few minutes later 😛

are you "special"? what do you think there is a honeymoon period here or something? heck the second news breaks either way there are responses on both sides....sometimes the stupidity level here amazes me.
 
Originally posted by: bozack
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Whoa! 22 minutes!

Longer than expected. Of course Galt isn't the one I was looking for. 😀

That came a few minutes later 😛

are you "special"? what do you think there is a honeymoon period here or something? heck the second news breaks either way there are responses on both sides....sometimes the stupidity level here amazes me.
Not me, I expect it!
 
Originally posted by: smashp

It is the NY Post, Not Exactly A beacon of journalistic Excellence

What's one more black eye to add to the bunch? :laugh:

On the Today Show, they just ragged on them to add further insult 😀
 
Originally posted by: Red Dawn

are you "special"? what do you think there is a honeymoon period here or something? heck the second news breaks either way there are responses on both sides....sometimes the stupidity level here amazes me.
Not me, I expect it![/quote]

what is that quote again Red about arguing on the internet and the special olympics?....reminds me alot of Winstons post, well maybe just the retarded part 🙂

I guess I should just *assume* that meatballs infest net forums, but I always hate making assumptions....jumping to conclusions is something totally different though 🙂
 
Originally posted by: cougarls88
Originally posted by: smashp

It is the NY Post, Not Exactly A beacon of journalistic Excellence

What's one more black eye to add to the bunch? :laugh:

On the Today Show, they just ragged on them to add further insult 😀


I Swore it Was Going To Be Hillary. Drudge Told Me So :roll:.

Im Still Waiting For Her to Still Get the nomination for Pres. I mean Rush Has said All Along she Will. I believe him. :roll:


Ha And they Accuse The Other side of Being Filled with Conspiracy theorists
 
Originally posted by: smashp
Originally posted by: cougarls88
Originally posted by: smashp

It is the NY Post, Not Exactly A beacon of journalistic Excellence

What's one more black eye to add to the bunch? :laugh:

On the Today Show, they just ragged on them to add further insult 😀


I Swore it Was Going To Be Hillary. Drudge Told Me So :roll:.

Im Still Waiting For Her to Still Get the nomination for Pres. I mean Rush Has said All Along she Will. I believe him. :roll:


Ha And they Accuse The Other side of Being Filled with Conspiracy theorists

:roll: As if you had a clue anyways. Drudge did not say it was going to be Hillary. Rush hasn't said it all along either. If you are going to try to bash people - atleast get your facts straight instead of lying about what these people have said.

Oh, and I guess the Post has one less informant from the left now.

CkG
 
Originally posted by: Siddhartha
Originally posted by: arsbanned
The south, very likely will be the battleground.

If you recall though, Edwards didn't do all that well in the South in the Primaries. Anyway, not to rain on the parade. I'm just trying to maintain a cautious approach. 😀

IIRC, Edwards did not do that well in the Primaries at all. But, I think he, as VP, will not hurt Kerry.

I agree - Kerry's major weakpoint is charisma. Edwards will provide plenty of that, but will not upstage Kerry like McCain would have.

But I think it still needs to be said: I'm voting AGAINST Bush, not for Kerry/Edwards...
 
I guess we'll here it from the dog's mouth Edwards will piss off ALL the labor unions

Now it's official

John Edwards Won what one State in the South and overall. His own and not by that much 🙂
Weak choice. He looks nice though but how brainless. Makes Bush like a Rhodes Scholar. 😉
 
Originally posted by: acemcmac
whats that song that came on the second he made the announcement?

"Right now," by Van Hagar. Ladies and Gentlemen, the Kerry campaign is recycling material from Pepsi marketing circa Vanilla Ice. Be afraid, be very afraid... 😉
 
Originally posted by: EXman
I guess we'll here it from the dog's mouth Edwards will piss off ALL the labor unions

Now it's official

John Edwards Won what one State in the South and overall. His own and not by that much 🙂
Weak choice. He looks nice though but how brainless. Makes Bush like a Rhodes Scholar. 😉

How ever dumb be may seem to you, I bet he can still write better than you can. :roll:

Makes Bush look like a Rhodes scholar? Are you a fvcking dipsh!t?
 
Great ticket...

A free loading ultra rich super liberal and his free loading ultra rich trial lawyer sidekick. Everyone loves lawyers, so they should really love Edwards. After all, most lawyers have clean track records.


This guy is going to be eaten alive. Six years of political experience - he is sure to crack.
 
Just what we need, another lawyer in office. It's funny how everyone forgets that you can't trust anything a lawyer says as soon as they run for office.
 
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Just what we need, another lawyer in office. It's funny how everyone forgets that you can't trust anything a lawyer says as soon as they run for office.

Since when could you trust any politician at all?
 
Originally posted by: Bowmaster
I agree - Kerry's major weakpoint is charisma. Edwards will provide plenty of that, but will not upstage Kerry like McCain would have.

But I think it still needs to be said: I'm voting AGAINST Bush, not for Kerry/Edwards...

people might respect you more if you were actually behind Kerry/Edwards instead of simply being against Bush and voting for anything that isn't in line with his Admin, always nice to know we have people voting for what they believe instead of just voting to get something out and not caring about what they put in.
 
freeloading? LOL
cuz Bush worked hard all his life with only a pittance to show for it, even though he showed such a great sense of self-sacrifice for his country, nobly volunteering to fight Communism.... Cheney was living on fixed income Social Security and VA benefits after his war injuries, before he worked his way up from the mailroom to head Halliburton.
these damn super rich liberals with their lazy draft dodging, embezzling, insider trading, ambulence chasing ways.
 
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Just what we need, another lawyer in office. It's funny how everyone forgets that you can't trust anything a lawyer says as soon as they run for office.

yeah, the lawyer background hopefully will hurt them big, just wondering what skeletons he is hiding back there.
 
Back
Top