Kavanaugh SCOTUS Senate Judicial Hearing

Page 131 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Jul 9, 2009
10,758
2,086
136
Think a little deeper. Think about the SCOTUS itself & how we, the People, need to feel about it. We need to respect it & even have a little reverence about it. Kavanaugh won't bring that to the Court at all.

Is that what you want to win? A SCOTUS diminished in the eyes of the People?
Bullshit! Kagan wasn't even a damn judge when Obutthole nominated her. Reverence for a know nothing, partisan lickspittle.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elena_Kagan
"Kagan is the first justice appointed without any prior experience as a judge since William Rehnquist in 1972. "
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,758
2,086
136
Get real. The Republican senate will make sure they bear false witness against her and already have by refusing to use the FBI to impartially investigate. You pretend to remain sceptical of all claims until the evidence is in and that very evidence is being denied to those women. They are willing and have passed polygraph tests. Is the asshole willing to do that. Your fucking blindness is evident to me. Only the brain dead won’t call a duck a duck when all the data points in that direction. Your phony impartiality will not affect normal people with ordinary common sense.

Why haven't the Democrats had the Washington DC police and/or the Maryland police investigating this for the last 8 weeks? They've know about it for 2 months while the Republicans didn't.

Both DC and Maryland are controlled by Democrats and all the alleged crimes took place in their jurisdiction and if the allegations can be believed aren't subject to Statute of Limitations?

Why?
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Bullshit! Kagan wasn't even a damn judge when Obutthole nominated her. Reverence for a know nothing, partisan lickspittle.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elena_Kagan
"Kagan is the first justice appointed without any prior experience as a judge since William Rehnquist in 1972. "

And the double down on duh-version. Neither Kagan nor Rehnquist carried the taint of this kind of scandal into the SCOTUS.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,758
2,086
136
Now tie your contrived "ballot" back to the liberal agenda. Thanks.

Remember, the last time liberals were in charge, America sent men to the moon and back.
When Nixon was President? He was a liberal? Your ignorance doesn't amaze me, i already knew you are as stupid as a box of fking rocks.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,738
31,104
146
Bullshit! Kagan wasn't even a damn judge when Obutthole nominated her. Reverence for a know nothing, partisan lickspittle.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elena_Kagan
"Kagan is the first justice appointed without any prior experience as a judge since William Rehnquist in 1972. "

what the fuck are you bloviating about and how does this claim act as a rebuttal to Jhnn? It is somehow "offensive" that a SCOTUS justice not have served as a judge before?

A SCOTUS appointee does not need to be a judge. That's a fact, and there have been many such justices in the history of the court. In your own fucking link, your great conservative dipshit hero Rehnquist was a recent example.
 

Maxima1

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,549
761
146
what the fuck are you bloviating about and how does this claim act as a rebuttal to Jhnn? It is somehow "offensive" that a SCOTUS justice not have served as a judge before?

A SCOTUS appointee does not need to be a judge. That's a fact, and there have been many such justices in the history of the court. In your own fucking link, your great conservative dipshit hero Rehnquist was a recent example.

And in his own link, Kagan was recommended by Scalia for her intelligence. D'oh. lol
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,758
2,086
136
what the fuck are you bloviating about and how does this claim act as a rebuttal to Jhnn? It is somehow "offensive" that a SCOTUS justice not have served as a judge before?

A SCOTUS appointee does not need to be a judge. That's a fact, and there have been many such justices in the history of the court. In your own fucking link, your great conservative dipshit hero Rehnquist was a recent example.
One of the comments ever present in this thread is that Kavanaugh wasn't qualified. It's bullshit of course, which I kindly pointed out with reference to Kagan.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
what the fuck are you bloviating about and how does this claim act as a rebuttal to Jhnn? It is somehow "offensive" that a SCOTUS justice not have served as a judge before?

A SCOTUS appointee does not need to be a judge. That's a fact, and there have been many such justices in the history of the court. In your own fucking link, your great conservative dipshit hero Rehnquist was a recent example.

He's thrashing around to come up with a suitable duh-version. Now it's the moon landings.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Oh, and Taj has now attacked three sitting Supreme Court Justices in some sort of false equivalency routine.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,758
2,086
136
From my reply to Moonie, but...........

Why haven't the Democrats had the Washington DC police and/or the Maryland police investigating this for the last 8 weeks? They've know about it for 2 months while the Republicans didn't.

Both DC and Maryland are controlled by Democrats and all the alleged crimes took place in their jurisdiction and if the allegations can be believed aren't subject to Statute of Limitations?

Why?
 

UberNeuman

Lifer
Nov 4, 1999
16,937
3,087
126
From my reply to Moonie, but...........

Why haven't the Democrats had the Washington DC police and/or the Maryland police investigating this for the last 8 weeks? They've know about it for 2 months while the Republicans didn't.

Both DC and Maryland are controlled by Democrats and all the alleged crimes took place in their jurisdiction and if the allegations can be believed aren't subject to Statute of Limitations?

Why?

lol.