• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Kavanaugh SCOTUS Senate Judicial Hearing

Page 131 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Jhhnn said:
Think a little deeper. Think about the SCOTUS itself & how we, the People, need to feel about it. We need to respect it & even have a little reverence about it. Kavanaugh won't bring that to the Court at all.

Is that what you want to win? A SCOTUS diminished in the eyes of the People?
Click to expand...
Bullshit! Kagan wasn't even a damn judge when Obutthole nominated her. Reverence for a know nothing, partisan lickspittle.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elena_Kagan
"Kagan is the first justice appointed without any prior experience as a judge since William Rehnquist in 1972. "
 
Moonbeam said:
Get real. The Republican senate will make sure they bear false witness against her and already have by refusing to use the FBI to impartially investigate. You pretend to remain sceptical of all claims until the evidence is in and that very evidence is being denied to those women. They are willing and have passed polygraph tests. Is the asshole willing to do that. Your fucking blindness is evident to me. Only the brain dead won’t call a duck a duck when all the data points in that direction. Your phony impartiality will not affect normal people with ordinary common sense.
Click to expand...

Why haven't the Democrats had the Washington DC police and/or the Maryland police investigating this for the last 8 weeks? They've know about it for 2 months while the Republicans didn't.

Both DC and Maryland are controlled by Democrats and all the alleged crimes took place in their jurisdiction and if the allegations can be believed aren't subject to Statute of Limitations?

Why?
 
IronWing said:
Now tie your contrived "ballot" back to the liberal agenda. Thanks.

Remember, the last time liberals were in charge, America sent men to the moon and back.
Click to expand...
When Nixon was President? He was a liberal? Your ignorance doesn't amaze me, i already knew you are as stupid as a box of fking rocks.
 
imported_tajmahal said:
Bullshit! Kagan wasn't even a damn judge when Obutthole nominated her. Reverence for a know nothing, partisan lickspittle.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elena_Kagan
"Kagan is the first justice appointed without any prior experience as a judge since William Rehnquist in 1972. "
Click to expand...

what the fuck are you bloviating about and how does this claim act as a rebuttal to Jhnn? It is somehow "offensive" that a SCOTUS justice not have served as a judge before?

A SCOTUS appointee does not need to be a judge. That's a fact, and there have been many such justices in the history of the court. In your own fucking link, your great conservative dipshit hero Rehnquist was a recent example.
 
zinfamous said:
what the fuck are you bloviating about and how does this claim act as a rebuttal to Jhnn? It is somehow "offensive" that a SCOTUS justice not have served as a judge before?

A SCOTUS appointee does not need to be a judge. That's a fact, and there have been many such justices in the history of the court. In your own fucking link, your great conservative dipshit hero Rehnquist was a recent example.
Click to expand...

And in his own link, Kagan was recommended by Scalia for her intelligence. D'oh. lol
 
zinfamous said:
what the fuck are you bloviating about and how does this claim act as a rebuttal to Jhnn? It is somehow "offensive" that a SCOTUS justice not have served as a judge before?

A SCOTUS appointee does not need to be a judge. That's a fact, and there have been many such justices in the history of the court. In your own fucking link, your great conservative dipshit hero Rehnquist was a recent example.
Click to expand...
One of the comments ever present in this thread is that Kavanaugh wasn't qualified. It's bullshit of course, which I kindly pointed out with reference to Kagan.
 
zinfamous said:
what the fuck are you bloviating about and how does this claim act as a rebuttal to Jhnn? It is somehow "offensive" that a SCOTUS justice not have served as a judge before?

A SCOTUS appointee does not need to be a judge. That's a fact, and there have been many such justices in the history of the court. In your own fucking link, your great conservative dipshit hero Rehnquist was a recent example.
Click to expand...

He's thrashing around to come up with a suitable duh-version. Now it's the moon landings.
 
From my reply to Moonie, but...........

Why haven't the Democrats had the Washington DC police and/or the Maryland police investigating this for the last 8 weeks? They've know about it for 2 months while the Republicans didn't.

Both DC and Maryland are controlled by Democrats and all the alleged crimes took place in their jurisdiction and if the allegations can be believed aren't subject to Statute of Limitations?

Why?
 
imported_tajmahal said:
From my reply to Moonie, but...........

Why haven't the Democrats had the Washington DC police and/or the Maryland police investigating this for the last 8 weeks? They've know about it for 2 months while the Republicans didn't.

Both DC and Maryland are controlled by Democrats and all the alleged crimes took place in their jurisdiction and if the allegations can be believed aren't subject to Statute of Limitations?

Why?
Click to expand...

lol.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top