It's absolutely intentional - at this point how could it not be? For whatever reason they have convinced themselves that accurately portraying Trump's infirmities is biased.The worst is how the press sane washes that into something like: President Trump discusses his economic plans for the auto industry to reassure anxious swing voters who are not sold on Kamala Harris.
Their failure (intentional or not) to effectively inform readers of the fact that he is a huge crank that you should not trust is really severe.
As I've said before I think this comes from 1) decades of Republicans relentlessly working the refs, relentlessly describing objective coverage as biased against them and 2) they stand to directly financially benefit from Trump's election.