Magic Carpet
Diamond Member
- Oct 2, 2011
- 3,477
- 234
- 106
Yeah, some cheap 115x boards will consume as much just idling aroundConsumption is barely 30W at full load measured at the wall..
Yeah, some cheap 115x boards will consume as much just idling aroundConsumption is barely 30W at full load measured at the wall..
Yeah, he probably meant load during general system usage. My Kabini does ~25W under heavy CPU/GPU stress-testing, but it's bound to be more-efficient due to BGA nature and lower TDP.30W for a 5350 system under both GPU and CPU load? No...
I wonder from where this fud come from..
Anyway so much for being misinformed, i have an Athlon 5350 and it doesnt throttle at all, not a single MHz, and i made extensive tests with Prime 95, Linpack and Luxmark CPU + GPU.
Consumption is barely 30W at full load measured at the wall..
30W for a 5350 system under both GPU and CPU load? No...
![]()
And in relation to the Haswell Celeron.
![]()
XBitlabs
Power supply: Corsair AX760i (80 Plus Platinum, 760 W)
Why dont you prove this usage of yours, instead of trying to tapdance and change the goalpost. Is it because you cant?
So you cant prove it and now start the personal route. Classic.
Screenshots and killowatt photo or it didn't happen.
Lol, i have a system with all necessary measurements gear..
IDLE 10.3W
LUXBALL GPU LUXBALL CPU LUXBALL CPU + GPU
CONS WATTS 15.9W 23.8W 27.8W
DELTA 5.6W 13.5W 17.5W
SCORE PTS 532 991 1584
WINDOWS SCR SCR OFF LINPACK PRIME 95 TT
10.8W 10.35W 28.5W 29.6W
Asrock AM1H ITX
Athlon 5350 2.05GHz
8Go 1600Mhz 1.35V
SSD 128Go
HDD 320Go
KB PS2
Wireles mouse USB
Wifi USB
Adaptator 65W 14.7V
Adapt Targa 14V7 PWR IDLE : 1W
You where asked to prove it.
Since you made a case for the power supply,have a look at the motherboards as wellAbout 13W idle and as said barely 30W on the main, sure that i dont use a 850W PSU like THG or XBitlabs.
In XBitlabs test wich use IBT the Celeron is favoured because it has no AVX, contrary to the Athlon wich has higher throughput in this test despite consuming quite less...
![]()
22W delta, that s about 15-16W at the CPU level.
You get 13W when idle? I get less then 16W while heavy gaming
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_vB8UkTr7g
Having decided Kabini isn't a option with a new budget of about $200,options like the 7400k and the 7600 have landed in my radar as well as something like perhaps the G3258.
I am assuming the 7600 has a better overall IGP then anything up to Intel 4600 or 530?It does offer 4 threads and perhaps it isn't to far off the reservation from a 7850k.Intel chips with 4600 and 530 certainly aren't affordable enough for me anyways.
Hardware.fr has 12.7W in the test above, i guess that it s hard for some to accept that AMD has the best low power solution...
http://www.computerbase.de/2014-04/...ckel-fs1b-test/3/#abschnitt_leistungsaufnahme
8W idle at Computerbase.de with 21.5W on games, perhaps another one ?
http://nl.hardware.info/reviews/533...goedkope-desktopplatforms-stroomverbruik-idle
It's also less then half the speed (mediaespresso/winrar) compared to the previous gen g1620 according to computerbase,so sure it has lower power consumption but that does not make it efficient.
12watt more at full load to get more then double the performance,and that's compared to the old gen g1620.
There's a reason that the A8-7600 is $20 more expensive than the A6-7400K. It's by far the better APU, if one plans to ever game. For a complete non-gamer, the 7400K would be just fine, of course.
Having decided Kabini isn't a option with a new budget of about $200,options like the 7400k and the 7600 have landed in my radar as well as something like perhaps the G3258.
I am assuming the 7600 has a better overall IGP then anything up to Intel 4600 or 530?It does offer 4 threads and perhaps it isn't to far off the reservation from a 7850k.Intel chips with 4600 and 530 certainly aren't affordable enough for me anyways.
