- Sep 5, 2005
- 320
- 0
- 0
I usually don't like Micheal Moore. He seems like a left wing nut job.
But this film was better than his normal stuff.
Was anyone swayed by this film, do you now support UHC when you didnt before?
I believe he made a very good argument. At least a more rational one that he usually does.
One day people will look back and this we are barbarians for denying people medical help.
However, this film had major flaws.
ie. We have free health care in Australia, but most people still have private health insurance. Why, because the free health care system sucks!
Same with England, the NHS is far from perfect.
You didn't say this Micheal!
But crappy health care for the poor is better than none. And everyone else can afford private health insurance. Not perfect but it works.
Anyone else agree, or am I an idiot?
But this film was better than his normal stuff.
Was anyone swayed by this film, do you now support UHC when you didnt before?
I believe he made a very good argument. At least a more rational one that he usually does.
One day people will look back and this we are barbarians for denying people medical help.
However, this film had major flaws.
ie. We have free health care in Australia, but most people still have private health insurance. Why, because the free health care system sucks!
Same with England, the NHS is far from perfect.
You didn't say this Micheal!
But crappy health care for the poor is better than none. And everyone else can afford private health insurance. Not perfect but it works.
Anyone else agree, or am I an idiot?