• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Just came back from Fahrenheit 9/11

UnatcoAgent

Diamond Member
This is probably the most powerful movie I have ever seen. If anything, I hope it takes away some Conservative votes tomorrow.

Moore rules.
 
Heh...this is one conservative who's vote it won't sway. I put Moore in the same category as Limbaugh. Obese, arrogant blowhard who need to shut the hell up and go away.
 
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Heh...this is one conservative who's vote it won't sway. I put Moore in the same category as Limbaugh. Obese, arrogant blowhard who need to shut the hell up and go away.

Ditto.
 
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Heh...this is one conservative who's vote it won't sway. I put Moore in the same category as Limbaugh. Obese, arrogant blowhard who need to shut the hell up and go away.

Limbaugh is one up on him then, I heard he lost a lot of weight. 😛
 
Originally posted by: cashman
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Heh...this is one conservative who's vote it won't sway. I put Moore in the same category as Limbaugh. Obese, arrogant blowhard who need to shut the hell up and go away.

Ditto.

LMFAO!!

EDIT: Oh, and I thought it was a pretty crappy "documentary." Good thing I got in for free.
 
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Heh...this is one conservative who's vote it won't sway. I put Moore in the same category as Limbaugh. Obese, arrogant blowhard who need to shut the hell up and go away.

Limbaugh is one up on him then, I heard he lost a lot of weight. 😛

Moore looks like a fat lesbian nun without the penguin outfit.
 
Originally posted by: slick230
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Heh...this is one conservative who's vote it won't sway. I put Moore in the same category as Limbaugh. Obese, arrogant blowhard who need to shut the hell up and go away.

Limbaugh is one up on him then, I heard he lost a lot of weight. 😛

Moore looks like a fat lesbian nun without the penguin outfit.

You just insulted fat lebian nuns everywhere! :|

They'll become skinny, heterosexual atheists just to avoid being compared to that jackass.
 
Originally posted by: Magnum375
Hah yeah his appearance is very comical, I don't see why some think it was a poorly done documentary though.


Because it's not really a documentary in the true sense of the word.
 
Originally posted by: Magnum375
Hah yeah his appearance is very comical, I don't see why some think it was a poorly done documentary though.

It's not a documentary. It's a political soapbox poorly disguised as a documentary.

Moore is just another half-witted political hack who like Limbaugh has his herd of sheep following him.
 
Originally posted by: cashman
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Heh...this is one conservative who's vote it won't sway. I put Moore in the same category as Limbaugh. Obese, arrogant blowhard who need to shut the hell up and go away.

Ditto.

Head?
 
Originally posted by: Magnum375
Hah yeah his appearance is very comical, I don't see why some think it was a poorly done documentary though.

More doesn't make documentarys. He makes propaganda. For it to be a documentary it actually has to true.
 
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Heh...this is one conservative who's vote it won't sway. I put Moore in the same category as Limbaugh. Obese, arrogant blowhard who need to shut the hell up and go away.


Amen to that. Although I am very Conservative, I'm not a Limbaugh fan. He's an egotistical blowhard.
 
Originally posted by: OMGoddess
It's funny, but despite being someone a lot of people hate, he sure is making alot of money.

Fools and their money are soon parted. Moore's typical audience is a classic example. 😉
 
Just saw it. It was a very compelling argument against the decisions made by the Bush administration immediately following 9/11. It was hysterical, touching, but ultimately very, very sad. To call such a work, or the person behind it lame, fat, stupid, corrupt, or self-serving, is irresponsible and ignorant. Whether one supports Bush or not, the consequences and ramifications of the Iraq war portrayed in this film are enlightening, if not already clear to the educated or simply wise.
 
Originally posted by: gururu
Just saw it. It was a very compelling argument against the decisions made by the Bush administration immediately following 9/11. It was hysterical, touching, but ultimately very, very sad. To call such a work, or the person behind it lame, fat, stupid, corrupt, or self-serving, is irresponsible and ignorant. Whether one supports Bush or not, the consequences and ramifications of the Iraq war portrayed in this film are enlightening, if not already clear to the educated or simply wise.

Oh please. I came to that conclusion about Moore long before this Farenheit 9/11 movie came out.
 
Originally posted by: gururu
Just saw it. It was a very compelling argument against the decisions made by the Bush administration immediately following 9/11. It was hysterical, touching, but ultimately very, very sad. To call such a work, or the person behind it lame, fat, stupid, corrupt, or self-serving, is irresponsible and ignorant. Whether one supports Bush or not, the consequences and ramifications of the Iraq war portrayed in this film are enlightening, if not already clear to the educated or simply wise.

I agree.
 
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Originally posted by: gururu
Just saw it. It was a very compelling argument against the decisions made by the Bush administration immediately following 9/11. It was hysterical, touching, but ultimately very, very sad. To call such a work, or the person behind it lame, fat, stupid, corrupt, or self-serving, is irresponsible and ignorant. Whether one supports Bush or not, the consequences and ramifications of the Iraq war portrayed in this film are enlightening, if not already clear to the educated or simply wise.

Oh please. I came to that conclusion about Moore long before this Farenheit 9/11 movie came out.

then your opinion on the film is hardly objective.
 
Originally posted by: gururu
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Originally posted by: gururu
Just saw it. It was a very compelling argument against the decisions made by the Bush administration immediately following 9/11. It was hysterical, touching, but ultimately very, very sad. To call such a work, or the person behind it lame, fat, stupid, corrupt, or self-serving, is irresponsible and ignorant. Whether one supports Bush or not, the consequences and ramifications of the Iraq war portrayed in this film are enlightening, if not already clear to the educated or simply wise.

Oh please. I came to that conclusion about Moore long before this Farenheit 9/11 movie came out.

then your opinion on the film is hardly objective.

Are you claiming that your opinion is objective, then?
 
Originally posted by: gururu
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Originally posted by: gururu
Just saw it. It was a very compelling argument against the decisions made by the Bush administration immediately following 9/11. It was hysterical, touching, but ultimately very, very sad. To call such a work, or the person behind it lame, fat, stupid, corrupt, or self-serving, is irresponsible and ignorant. Whether one supports Bush or not, the consequences and ramifications of the Iraq war portrayed in this film are enlightening, if not already clear to the educated or simply wise.

Oh please. I came to that conclusion about Moore long before this Farenheit 9/11 movie came out.

then your opinion on the film is hardly objective.

Well...I don't think I claimed to have any intention of seeing the film and I know I'm definately not objective when it comes to Moore. I view paying to watch this film in the same vein as buying one of those right-wing nutjobs (ie. Limbaugh) self-serving books.
 
The New York Times says that Michael Moore's new movie "blithely tramples the boundary between documentary and demagoguery" and that it is more like an "editorial cartoon." That's what the Times says.
 
Originally posted by: FoBoT
The New York Times says that Michael Moore's new movie "blithely tramples the boundary between documentary and demagoguery" and that it is more like an "editorial cartoon." That's what the Times says.

this is the kind of movie that you have to judge for yourself, lest you be swayed into thinking it is a great movie, at least by www.rottentomatoes.com poll of critic reviews.

Felfdenak, I have to respect your opinion... well because I'm just that sort of guy

🙂
 
Back
Top