• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Judge declares a mistrial in Bundy case

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

urvile

Golden Member
Aug 3, 2017
1,575
474
96
This is the australian version of bundy aka bundaberg rum. I am sure this shit has been the catalyst for many a trial. It's cheap. It's nasty and it gets you mean drunk.

7LPE6OR.jpg


Some typical bundy drinkers I am fairly sure the first guy is the result of incest.

ScBxBHi.jpg

zEZrmOF.jpg
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Set on fire by FBI agents? or is this a Chip and Joanna Gaines Fixer Upper?

More slime, huh? It was obvious at the time that the Branch Davidians set the fire themselves.

Which really has nothing to do with the Bundyites, anyway, other than the FBI figuring out better ways to proceed in the aftermath. The FBI has shown remarkable restraint in dealing with the romantic idiots of the sovereign citizen/ militia/ sagebrush rebellion. They've been trying really hard to not have to kill anybody.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,758
2,086
136
More slime, huh? It was obvious at the time that the Branch Davidians set the fire themselves.

Which really has nothing to do with the Bundyites, anyway, other than the FBI figuring out better ways to proceed in the aftermath. The FBI has shown remarkable restraint in dealing with the romantic idiots of the sovereign citizen/ militia/ sagebrush rebellion. They've been trying really hard to not have to kill anybody.
I'm glad they're not setting more children on fire, it's good to see that you are also.
 

bshole

Diamond Member
Mar 12, 2013
8,315
1,215
126
When did we decide that terrorist acts committed by white people don't get punished?

The definition of terrorism is:
the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

By that definition, their actions qualify as terrorism. I don't know what the legal definition of terrorism is so perhaps they don't qualify under the legal definition.
 

interchange

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,026
2,879
136
Why do you have to choose one thing or another? Can it not be that Bundy repeatedly violated land law and participated in a standoff and also that the feds repeatedly violated his rights during prosecution such that a fair trial can no longer be expected. That's a moral quandary, but it's one that our founding fathers were quite clear on intent. It is more important to protect the rights of the guilty. I agree with them on this one. I want justice for Bundy too, but we can't have that without sacrificing accountability for abuses of prosecution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: imported_tajmahal
Jul 9, 2009
10,758
2,086
136
The definition of terrorism is:

By that definition, their actions qualify as terrorism. I don't know what the legal definition of terrorism is so perhaps they don't qualify under the legal definition.
Since when are the BLM, FBI and federal agencies considered "civilians" and what acts are you talking about? Grazing cattle or defending themselves?
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,899
34,001
136
As Taj has decided to fully embrace the Bundy agenda, can we add theft and terrorism to tossing grenades at children as activities he is a-okay with? We need a scroll of Taj to keep score of his depravity.