John Carter

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

chusteczka

Diamond Member
Apr 12, 2006
3,399
3
71
He's 7, so he could care less about the plot as long as it looks cool. If it can at least halfway keep my interest, it's worth it. I'll give it a go tomorrow and report back.

There is a cute martian princess in a skimpy outfit that should keep your interest.
http://movies.yahoo.com/blogs/movie...-martian-princess-lynn-collins-151430260.html

lynncollins_300.jpg
 

LookBehindYou

Platinum Member
Dec 23, 2010
2,412
1
81
Well shit. I started this thread and didn't even see the movie. My son changed his mind at the last minute and wanted to see Journey 2 The Mysterious Island, so that's what we saw. It was ok, tolerable. For the type of movie it is, it held my interest.
 

CZroe

Lifer
Jun 24, 2001
24,195
857
126
Well shit. I started this thread and didn't even see the movie. My son changed his mind at the last minute and wanted to see Journey 2 The Mysterious Island, so that's what we saw. It was ok, tolerable. For the type of movie it is, it held my interest.

*FACEPALM*

Don't ever ask for our advice again. I saw Journey 1 for the 3D and it was crapfest of epic proportions.
 
Last edited:

LookBehindYou

Platinum Member
Dec 23, 2010
2,412
1
81
*FACEPALM*

Don't ever ask for our advice again. I saw Journey 1 for the 3D and it was crapfest of epic proportions.

The 3D for Journey 2 was actually some of the better 3D I've seen since Avatar as far as live action movies go. Like I said, It's a kid's movie, for me it was tolerable. Not going to say it was horrible if it wasnt.
 

Fingolfin269

Lifer
Feb 28, 2003
17,948
33
91
What I really don't understand is why someone would green light John Carter for $250m? I've heard this is really not a bad movie but it was set up to fail in Hollywood terms based on budget alone.
 

BladeVenom

Lifer
Jun 2, 2005
13,365
16
0

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
Wierd

I had a friend who wanted to see this movie, and I knew nothing of it, didn't see any trailers, any commercials for it, knew nothing of the story - I went along and saw the movie in theaters and was entertained, I thought it was a pretty good movie.

Could it have been better? Yes. Could it have been worse? Yes.

Then I'm seeing all over the internet so much negativity surrounding this movie from people who will never see the movie even once?

What? I guess I don't "get it".
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
I suppose the lack of vulgar language and titties will keep many ATOT forum posters away from the movie :p

Though on the flip side, every one of you saw Jar Jar Binks multiple times, and the creatures in this movie do not even begin to compare on a scale to Jar Jar.
 
Last edited:

CZroe

Lifer
Jun 24, 2001
24,195
857
126
The 3D for Journey 2 was actually some of the better 3D I've seen since Avatar as far as live action movies go. Like I said, It's a kid's movie, for me it was tolerable. Not going to say it was horrible if it wasnt.

"Kids' movie?" It's a bastardization of classic literature. I had no qualms with the 3D itself, just with a movie that has an entire scene and scenario concocted so that a boss can stick a tape measure in someone's face and the audience can go "Ooooo! 3D!" Avatar was guilty of that too: The "romp" in his new body was so that Cameron could justify his character running haphazardly through a garden kicking 3D dirt toward the camera, but his disability was concocted in the first place to add a dramatic twist to the concept of entering another body and the scene also served to show his elation at being able to walk again. The entire scene and the scenario that set it up was concocted for no other reason than having that tape measure pointed between the two lenses and then retracted. Stupid. I've got nothing against raw entertainment, but I wouldn't let my kids watch trash that only makes them dumb when there is real entertainment to be had. The only reason I sat through it was to see how thoroughly it soaked Jules Verne's grave with urine. It shouldn't exist. "Kids' movie" is no excuse. Brendon Fraser should not ever work in motion pictures again after that and "Furry Vengeance." I hope he was paying back a few favors when he chose to power through those. :rolleyes:

Edit: after checking his filmography, he's been in movies every year of his career since he became active in 1991 until Vengeance and hasn't made a movie since. +1 for consequences! He got lucky to be in "Crash" (Best Picture). I see that he made a movie called "Journey to the End of the Night" shortly before the first Journey and I wonder if he or his agent accidentally obligated him to that other crap-fest thinking that they were the same thing ("Journey to the X of the X")?
 
Last edited:

amish

Diamond Member
Aug 20, 2004
4,295
6
81
i saw it this afternoon. it wasn't terrible, but it wasn't ground breaking either. there wasn't violence for the sake of violence. the movie told a story, probably not up to the original book, but it was a decent story.

the cast did well. they aren't going to win any major awards but they did well. i thought that the princess was smoking hot. she is just my type.

i know that there are multiple books but i hope that they don't make any sequals.
 

KeithTalent

Elite Member | Administrator | No Lifer
Administrator
Nov 30, 2005
50,231
118
116
I'm out of words to slam disney on this movie

Possible $150 million write-down: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/john-carter-box-office-disney-flop-298610?

The movie, which Disney spent about $350 million to make and market, took in $30.2 million domestically over its opening weekend and another $70.6 million internationally. It's likely to top out at around $300 million theatrically worldwide, or possibly $350 million, though its break-even point for Disney is closer to $650 million. DVD and pay TV will help stem the bleeding, but a significant write-off is inevitable.
o_O

That's a crazy break-even point for one movie. What a disaster if this holds.

KT
 

Ns1

No Lifer
Jun 17, 2001
55,420
1,600
126
What I really don't understand is why someone would green light John Carter for $250m? I've heard this is really not a bad movie but it was set up to fail in Hollywood terms based on budget alone.

word on the street is lots of egos to be massaged - the director made a lot of great movies for Pixar. Green lighted by previous administration - after dropping 250m it's a little too late to pull the plug.

That's a crazy break-even point for one movie.
KT

Welcome to every AAA tent pole released by any major studio for the past 2 decades. That's why everyone and their mom is trying to get into the <10m (Paranormal Activity, Project X) game.
 

JEDI

Lifer
Sep 25, 2001
29,391
2,738
126
how is the break-even point $600M if it costs $350M to make and market the movie?!
 

KeithTalent

Elite Member | Administrator | No Lifer
Administrator
Nov 30, 2005
50,231
118
116
Welcome to every AAA tent pole released by any major studio for the past 2 decades. That's why everyone and their mom is trying to get into the <10m (Paranormal Activity, Project X) game.

I honestly kind of want to see this in the theatre now, just to see if it looks like $250 million up there on the screen. I can't believe they didn't even film this in 3D and it still cost that much. Crazy.

KT
 

Ns1

No Lifer
Jun 17, 2001
55,420
1,600
126
how is the break-even point $600M if it costs $350M to make and market the movie?!

250 to make 150 to market, plus distribution fees and other payments to rights holders/investors/etc
 

slayer202

Lifer
Nov 27, 2005
13,679
119
106
I honestly kind of want to see this in the theatre now, just to see if it looks like $250 million up there on the screen. I can't believe they didn't even film this in 3D and it still cost that much. Crazy.

KT

I saw one clip of some huge white beast thing and I have to say it looked pretty impressive. But then again, I never see these movies so I can't compare to the current "norm." Hell, when I saw Silent House, the Wrath of the Titans trailer was actually kinda cool...Maybe I'm going soft :D
 

KeithTalent

Elite Member | Administrator | No Lifer
Administrator
Nov 30, 2005
50,231
118
116
I saw one clip of some huge white beast thing and I have to say it looked pretty impressive. But then again, I never see these movies so I can't compare to the current "norm." Hell, when I saw Silent House, the Wrath of the Titans trailer was actually kinda cool...Maybe I'm going soft :D

That trailer was cool until Worthington's expressionless mug showed up on screen. That guy is freaking terrible.

KT
 

Glitchny

Diamond Member
Sep 4, 2002
5,679
1
0
Saw this Friday night. Was a pretty decent adventure/action movie. Nothing groundbreaking or amazing but it was a fun movie.
 

Doppel

Lifer
Feb 5, 2011
13,306
3
0
One of the dumbest names ever for a sci fi action movie, might as well have named it tree trunk or something else forgettable, whether based on books nobody has read or not. Reviews indicate it's probably half decent, but nothing great. The premise sure sounds absurd to me and a lot of others it appears.