BoomerD
No Lifer
- Feb 26, 2006
- 66,037
- 14,436
- 146
AFAIK consensus there are names but no singular compiled client listI'm struggling to follow this story. Where have things got to now?
What's the view here on whether this "list" actually exists or not? Was Pam Bondi lying when she said she had the list on her desk right now or is the Trump administration lying now in denying there is such a list?
The median voter.My friend still lives in the rural Midwest town I moved away from, a nearby house that used to have a Trump flag that had switched to an 8647 sign earlier this year now has a "release the files" sign.
The final report will be made by using CTRL-F ; Find: Trump ; Replace: BidenYeah they can’t even come up with modestly believable lies at this point. Nobody is going to buy that shit.
AFAIK consensus there are names but no singular compiled client list
At this point it’s semantics
The final report will be made by using CTRL-F ; Find: Trump ; Replace: Biden
@Greenman is already tearing upMy prediction: they will push Maxwell's sob story that she was in fear of her life so she did whatever Epstein told her to do. The current administration, to show that it cares, will pardon her because whatever she did was under coercion so she didn't actually do it. And she will testify that trump was the kindest most ethical person she ever met. End of story.
And sheep will rejoice and celebrate in the streets and pedophiles will get back to their "important" work without fear.
It won't go anywhere because discovery would be ruinous for the trumpsSo Melania Trump is super upset about Hunter Biden going on some obscure podcast and claiming that Epstein introduced her to Trump. She’s threatening a $1 billion libel suit with potential economic damages?? Apparently, he was just paraphrasing what he’d read in Michael Wolff’s new book.
This is hilarious—because I’m pretty sure very, very few people would have heard/read whatever Hunter Biden is saying without Melania’s lawsuit. Art of the distraction. Why are they suing Hunter instead of Michael Wolff, who made the claim in print [hint: they don’t want discovery]?? You can be sued for paraphrasing dubious facts on podcasts now? Lookout Joe Rogan!!!
This is all engineered to get Hunter Biden’s name back in the news and spur MAGA into crusading against Trump’s enemies once again. Forget the Epstein files.
FWIW, Melania’s best friend is in Epstein’s little black book. Don’t take my word for it.
Oh so this is why I flashed past Fox and heard something like "despicable Hunter Biden, blah, blah", and I did my usual eye roll, really not really caring about the next of many distractions that the Trump cult launches in an on going effort to continue his criminal assault on our Constitution.So Melania Trump is super upset about Hunter Biden going on some obscure podcast and claiming that Epstein introduced her to Trump. She’s threatening a $1 billion libel suit with potential economic damages?? Apparently, he was just paraphrasing what he’d read in Michael Wolff’s new book.
This is hilarious—because I’m pretty sure very, very few people would have heard/read whatever Hunter Biden is saying without Melania’s lawsuit. Art of the distraction. Why are they suing Hunter instead of Michael Wolff, who made the claim in print [hint: they don’t want discovery]?? You can be sued for paraphrasing dubious facts on podcasts now? Lookout Joe Rogan!!!
This is all engineered to get Hunter Biden’s name back in the news and spur MAGA into crusading against Trump’s enemies once again. Forget the Epstein files.
FWIW, Melania’s best friend is in Epstein’s little black book. Don’t take my word for it.
This is just more shit thrown at the wall but also I bet she files it in a place without strong SLAPP laws because the point here is vexatious litigation and not an actual lawsuit.So Melania Trump is super upset about Hunter Biden going on some obscure podcast and claiming that Epstein introduced her to Trump. She’s threatening a $1 billion libel suit with potential economic damages?? Apparently, he was just paraphrasing what he’d read in Michael Wolff’s new book.
This is hilarious—because I’m pretty sure very, very few people would have heard/read whatever Hunter Biden is saying without Melania’s lawsuit. Art of the distraction. Why are they suing Hunter instead of Michael Wolff, who made the claim in print [hint: they don’t want discovery]?? You can be sued for paraphrasing dubious facts on podcasts now? Lookout Joe Rogan!!!
This is all engineered to get Hunter Biden’s name back in the news and spur MAGA into crusading against Trump’s enemies once again. Forget the Epstein files.
FWIW, Melania’s best friend is in Epstein’s little black book. Don’t take my word for it.