Jeffrey Epstein Commits Suicide at Manhattan Jail

[BoomerD]

 

[pmv]

I'm struggling to follow this story. Where have things got to now?

What's the view here on whether this "list" actually exists or not? Was Pam Bondi lying when she said she had the list on her desk right now or is the Trump administration lying now in denying there is such a list?

 

[HomerJS]

I'm struggling to follow this story. Where have things got to now?

What's the view here on whether this "list" actually exists or not? Was Pam Bondi lying when she said she had the list on her desk right now or is the Trump administration lying now in denying there is such a list?

AFAIK consensus there are names but no singular compiled client list

At this point it’s semantics

 

[nakedfrog]

My friend still lives in the rural Midwest town I moved away from, a nearby house that used to have a Trump flag that had switched to an 8647 sign earlier this year now has a "release the files" sign.

 

[Brainonska511]

My friend still lives in the rural Midwest town I moved away from, a nearby house that used to have a Trump flag that had switched to an 8647 sign earlier this year now has a "release the files" sign.

The median voter.

 

[SMOGZINN]

Yeah they can’t even come up with modestly believable lies at this point. Nobody is going to buy that shit.

The final report will be made by using CTRL-F ; Find: Trump ; Replace: Biden

 

[HomerJS]

For those still in Camp Trump. You know who you are

 

[cytg111]

AFAIK consensus there are names but no singular compiled client list

At this point it’s semantics

I mean if there is not a list someone(s) not been doing their job(s)...

But I am sure that when the flaccid fascists postulates that there is no Epstein list that they tongue in cheek mean that there is no hand written note by Jeffrey himself.

They are completely corrupted with zero redeeming qualities.

edit: I just saw this... Hahahaha .. fcuked.

 

[ch33zw1z]

The final report will be made by using CTRL-F ; Find: Trump ; Replace: Biden

“9,179 found and replaced”

 

[igor_kavinski]

My prediction: they will push Maxwell's sob story that she was in fear of her life so she did whatever Epstein told her to do. The current administration, to show that it cares, will pardon her because whatever she did was under coercion so she didn't actually do it. And she will testify that trump was the kindest most ethical person she ever met. End of story.

And sheep will rejoice and celebrate in the streets and pedophiles will get back to their "important" work without fear.

 

[HomerJS]

My prediction: they will push Maxwell's sob story that she was in fear of her life so she did whatever Epstein told her to do. The current administration, to show that it cares, will pardon her because whatever she did was under coercion so she didn't actually do it. And she will testify that trump was the kindest most ethical person she ever met. End of story.

And sheep will rejoice and celebrate in the streets and pedophiles will get back to their "important" work without fear.

@Greenman is already tearing up

 

[outriding]

@Greenman is already tearing up

I think this is more fitting

 

[nakedfrog]

I was thinking more like this.

 

[UNCjigga]

So Melania Trump is super upset about Hunter Biden going on some obscure podcast and claiming that Epstein introduced her to Trump. She’s threatening a $1 billion libel suit with potential economic damages?? Apparently, he was just paraphrasing what he’d read in Michael Wolff’s new book.

This is hilarious—because I’m pretty sure very, very few people would have heard/read whatever Hunter Biden is saying without Melania’s lawsuit. Art of the distraction. Why are they suing Hunter instead of Michael Wolff, who made the claim in print [hint: they don’t want discovery]?? You can be sued for paraphrasing dubious facts on podcasts now? Lookout Joe Rogan!!!

This is all engineered to get Hunter Biden’s name back in the news and spur MAGA into crusading against Trump’s enemies once again. Forget the Epstein files.

FWIW, Melania’s best friend is in Epstein’s little black book. Don’t take my word for it.

 

[Fenixgoon]

So Melania Trump is super upset about Hunter Biden going on some obscure podcast and claiming that Epstein introduced her to Trump. She’s threatening a $1 billion libel suit with potential economic damages?? Apparently, he was just paraphrasing what he’d read in Michael Wolff’s new book.

This is hilarious—because I’m pretty sure very, very few people would have heard/read whatever Hunter Biden is saying without Melania’s lawsuit. Art of the distraction. Why are they suing Hunter instead of Michael Wolff, who made the claim in print [hint: they don’t want discovery]?? You can be sued for paraphrasing dubious facts on podcasts now? Lookout Joe Rogan!!!

This is all engineered to get Hunter Biden’s name back in the news and spur MAGA into crusading against Trump’s enemies once again. Forget the Epstein files.

FWIW, Melania’s best friend is in Epstein’s little black book. Don’t take my word for it.

It won't go anywhere because discovery would be ruinous for the trumps

 

[hal2kilo]

So Melania Trump is super upset about Hunter Biden going on some obscure podcast and claiming that Epstein introduced her to Trump. She’s threatening a $1 billion libel suit with potential economic damages?? Apparently, he was just paraphrasing what he’d read in Michael Wolff’s new book.

This is hilarious—because I’m pretty sure very, very few people would have heard/read whatever Hunter Biden is saying without Melania’s lawsuit. Art of the distraction. Why are they suing Hunter instead of Michael Wolff, who made the claim in print [hint: they don’t want discovery]?? You can be sued for paraphrasing dubious facts on podcasts now? Lookout Joe Rogan!!!

This is all engineered to get Hunter Biden’s name back in the news and spur MAGA into crusading against Trump’s enemies once again. Forget the Epstein files.

FWIW, Melania’s best friend is in Epstein’s little black book. Don’t take my word for it.

Oh so this is why I flashed past Fox and heard something like "despicable Hunter Biden, blah, blah", and I did my usual eye roll, really not really caring about the next of many distractions that the Trump cult launches in an on going effort to continue his criminal assault on our Constitution.

 

[fskimospy]

So Melania Trump is super upset about Hunter Biden going on some obscure podcast and claiming that Epstein introduced her to Trump. She’s threatening a $1 billion libel suit with potential economic damages?? Apparently, he was just paraphrasing what he’d read in Michael Wolff’s new book.

This is hilarious—because I’m pretty sure very, very few people would have heard/read whatever Hunter Biden is saying without Melania’s lawsuit. Art of the distraction. Why are they suing Hunter instead of Michael Wolff, who made the claim in print [hint: they don’t want discovery]?? You can be sued for paraphrasing dubious facts on podcasts now? Lookout Joe Rogan!!!

This is all engineered to get Hunter Biden’s name back in the news and spur MAGA into crusading against Trump’s enemies once again. Forget the Epstein files.

FWIW, Melania’s best friend is in Epstein’s little black book. Don’t take my word for it.

This is just more shit thrown at the wall but also I bet she files it in a place without strong SLAPP laws because the point here is vexatious litigation and not an actual lawsuit.

 

[HomerJS]

The party that bitched about the deep state.

 

[HomerJS]

Trump dismissing the Epstein victims as just Democrats. There is no low for this guy

Trump privately rages at Epstein victims as 'clearly Democrats': insiders

President Donald Trump has said very little about disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking victims, but the story is different inside the White House, according to a new report. Rolling Stone spoke with two White House insiders "familiar with [Trump's] private remarks" about how he...

www.rawstory.com

 

[BoomerD]

I think this is more fitting

View attachment 128734

 

[Greenman]

I'm struggling to follow this story. Where have things got to now?

What's the view here on whether this "list" actually exists or not? Was Pam Bondi lying when she said she had the list on her desk right now or is the Trump administration lying now in denying there is such a list?

Nowhere. For all the announcements, accusations, speculation, and recriminations, exactly nothing has changed. The FBI has had all the information for six years and done nothing with it. My hunch is it
s never going to be released.

 

[SMOGZINN]

Nowhere. For all the announcements, accusations, speculation, and recriminations, exactly nothing has changed. The FBI has had all the information for six years and done nothing with it. My hunch is it
s never going to be released.

My bet is that they already destroyed it all. You can't leak something that has been put through the shredder.

 

[fskimospy]

My bet is that they already destroyed it all. You can't leak something that has been put through the shredder.

I doubt that. First, there are probably lots of copies of the materials and second lots and lots of people have probably seen it. If you destroy it I think it would be hard to know you actually destroyed it and it would provide an incentive for people to leak what they have.

Maybe these guys are stupid enough to try but my gut says it would not be successful.

 

[hal2kilo]

Oh so this is why I flashed past Fox and heard something like "despicable Hunter Biden, blah, blah", and I did my usual eye roll, really not really caring about the next of many distractions that the Trump cult launches in an on going effort to continue his criminal assault on our Constitution.

Talk about Big Balls...

"F**k that": Hunter Biden responds to Melania Trump's demand for an apology over Epstein story - Salon.com

Facing a $1B defamation suit, Biden refused to walk back statements about Melania Trump and Jeffrey Epstein.

www.salon.com

 

[SMOGZINN]

I doubt that. First, there are probably lots of copies of the materials and second lots and lots of people have probably seen it. If you destroy it I think it would be hard to know you actually destroyed it and it would provide an incentive for people to leak what they have.

Maybe these guys are stupid enough to try but my gut says it would not be successful.

It matters on just how those files have been handled. The stories that they had 1000 FBI agents pouring over it would mean that there are a lot of copies out there and you would be right. If that was an exaggeration, or if they classified the material, then they probably have some strict control of it and know where the copies are and who is handling them.
Since we have not really seen any leaks yet, I think it likely they have successfully controlled the documents and if so, have probably already destroyed any that were bad for the Trump administration.