• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Jeffrey Epstein Commits Suicide at Manhattan Jail

Page 60 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
HomerJS said:
AFAIK consensus there are names but no singular compiled client list

At this point it’s semantics
Click to expand...

I mean if there is not a list someone(s) not been doing their job(s)...

But I am sure that when the flaccid fascists postulates that there is no Epstein list that they tongue in cheek mean that there is no hand written note by Jeffrey himself.

They are completely corrupted with zero redeeming qualities.

edit: I just saw this... Hahahaha .. fcuked.

 
Last edited:
My prediction: they will push Maxwell's sob story that she was in fear of her life so she did whatever Epstein told her to do. The current administration, to show that it cares, will pardon her because whatever she did was under coercion so she didn't actually do it. And she will testify that trump was the kindest most ethical person she ever met. End of story.

And sheep will rejoice and celebrate in the streets and pedophiles will get back to their "important" work without fear.
 
igor_kavinski said:
My prediction: they will push Maxwell's sob story that she was in fear of her life so she did whatever Epstein told her to do. The current administration, to show that it cares, will pardon her because whatever she did was under coercion so she didn't actually do it. And she will testify that trump was the kindest most ethical person she ever met. End of story.

And sheep will rejoice and celebrate in the streets and pedophiles will get back to their "important" work without fear.
Click to expand...
@Greenman is already tearing up
cry.gif
 
So Melania Trump is super upset about Hunter Biden going on some obscure podcast and claiming that Epstein introduced her to Trump. She’s threatening a $1 billion libel suit with potential economic damages?? Apparently, he was just paraphrasing what he’d read in Michael Wolff’s new book.

This is hilarious—because I’m pretty sure very, very few people would have heard/read whatever Hunter Biden is saying without Melania’s lawsuit. Art of the distraction. Why are they suing Hunter instead of Michael Wolff, who made the claim in print [hint: they don’t want discovery]?? You can be sued for paraphrasing dubious facts on podcasts now? Lookout Joe Rogan!!!

This is all engineered to get Hunter Biden’s name back in the news and spur MAGA into crusading against Trump’s enemies once again. Forget the Epstein files.

FWIW, Melania’s best friend is in Epstein’s little black book. Don’t take my word for it.
 
UNCjigga said:
So Melania Trump is super upset about Hunter Biden going on some obscure podcast and claiming that Epstein introduced her to Trump. She’s threatening a $1 billion libel suit with potential economic damages?? Apparently, he was just paraphrasing what he’d read in Michael Wolff’s new book.

This is hilarious—because I’m pretty sure very, very few people would have heard/read whatever Hunter Biden is saying without Melania’s lawsuit. Art of the distraction. Why are they suing Hunter instead of Michael Wolff, who made the claim in print [hint: they don’t want discovery]?? You can be sued for paraphrasing dubious facts on podcasts now? Lookout Joe Rogan!!!

This is all engineered to get Hunter Biden’s name back in the news and spur MAGA into crusading against Trump’s enemies once again. Forget the Epstein files.

FWIW, Melania’s best friend is in Epstein’s little black book. Don’t take my word for it.
Click to expand...
It won't go anywhere because discovery would be ruinous for the trumps
 
UNCjigga said:
So Melania Trump is super upset about Hunter Biden going on some obscure podcast and claiming that Epstein introduced her to Trump. She’s threatening a $1 billion libel suit with potential economic damages?? Apparently, he was just paraphrasing what he’d read in Michael Wolff’s new book.

This is hilarious—because I’m pretty sure very, very few people would have heard/read whatever Hunter Biden is saying without Melania’s lawsuit. Art of the distraction. Why are they suing Hunter instead of Michael Wolff, who made the claim in print [hint: they don’t want discovery]?? You can be sued for paraphrasing dubious facts on podcasts now? Lookout Joe Rogan!!!

This is all engineered to get Hunter Biden’s name back in the news and spur MAGA into crusading against Trump’s enemies once again. Forget the Epstein files.

FWIW, Melania’s best friend is in Epstein’s little black book. Don’t take my word for it.
Click to expand...
Oh so this is why I flashed past Fox and heard something like "despicable Hunter Biden, blah, blah", and I did my usual eye roll, really not really caring about the next of many distractions that the Trump cult launches in an on going effort to continue his criminal assault on our Constitution.
 
UNCjigga said:
So Melania Trump is super upset about Hunter Biden going on some obscure podcast and claiming that Epstein introduced her to Trump. She’s threatening a $1 billion libel suit with potential economic damages?? Apparently, he was just paraphrasing what he’d read in Michael Wolff’s new book.

This is hilarious—because I’m pretty sure very, very few people would have heard/read whatever Hunter Biden is saying without Melania’s lawsuit. Art of the distraction. Why are they suing Hunter instead of Michael Wolff, who made the claim in print [hint: they don’t want discovery]?? You can be sued for paraphrasing dubious facts on podcasts now? Lookout Joe Rogan!!!

This is all engineered to get Hunter Biden’s name back in the news and spur MAGA into crusading against Trump’s enemies once again. Forget the Epstein files.

FWIW, Melania’s best friend is in Epstein’s little black book. Don’t take my word for it.
Click to expand...
This is just more shit thrown at the wall but also I bet she files it in a place without strong SLAPP laws because the point here is vexatious litigation and not an actual lawsuit.
 
Trump dismissing the Epstein victims as just Democrats. There is no low for this guy
www.rawstory.com

Trump privately rages at Epstein victims as 'clearly Democrats': insiders

President Donald Trump has said very little about disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking victims, but the story is different inside the White House, according to a new report. Rolling Stone spoke with two White House insiders "familiar with [Trump's] private remarks" about how he...
www.rawstory.com www.rawstory.com
 
pmv said:
I'm struggling to follow this story. Where have things got to now?

What's the view here on whether this "list" actually exists or not? Was Pam Bondi lying when she said she had the list on her desk right now or is the Trump administration lying now in denying there is such a list?
Click to expand...
Nowhere. For all the announcements, accusations, speculation, and recriminations, exactly nothing has changed. The FBI has had all the information for six years and done nothing with it. My hunch is it
s never going to be released.
 
Greenman said:
Nowhere. For all the announcements, accusations, speculation, and recriminations, exactly nothing has changed. The FBI has had all the information for six years and done nothing with it. My hunch is it
s never going to be released.
Click to expand...
My bet is that they already destroyed it all. You can't leak something that has been put through the shredder.
 
SMOGZINN said:
My bet is that they already destroyed it all. You can't leak something that has been put through the shredder.
Click to expand...
I doubt that. First, there are probably lots of copies of the materials and second lots and lots of people have probably seen it. If you destroy it I think it would be hard to know you actually destroyed it and it would provide an incentive for people to leak what they have.

Maybe these guys are stupid enough to try but my gut says it would not be successful.
 
hal2kilo said:
Oh so this is why I flashed past Fox and heard something like "despicable Hunter Biden, blah, blah", and I did my usual eye roll, really not really caring about the next of many distractions that the Trump cult launches in an on going effort to continue his criminal assault on our Constitution.
Click to expand...
Talk about Big Balls...

www.salon.com

"F**k that": Hunter Biden responds to Melania Trump's demand for an apology over Epstein story - Salon.com

Facing a $1B defamation suit, Biden refused to walk back statements about Melania Trump and Jeffrey Epstein.
www.salon.com www.salon.com
 
fskimospy said:
I doubt that. First, there are probably lots of copies of the materials and second lots and lots of people have probably seen it. If you destroy it I think it would be hard to know you actually destroyed it and it would provide an incentive for people to leak what they have.

Maybe these guys are stupid enough to try but my gut says it would not be successful.
Click to expand...
It matters on just how those files have been handled. The stories that they had 1000 FBI agents pouring over it would mean that there are a lot of copies out there and you would be right. If that was an exaggeration, or if they classified the material, then they probably have some strict control of it and know where the copies are and who is handling them.
Since we have not really seen any leaks yet, I think it likely they have successfully controlled the documents and if so, have probably already destroyed any that were bad for the Trump administration.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top