exposed? WTF does that mean? Im all for prosecuting those that broke the law. Ive said many times if Trump broke the law, Im expecting charges to be filed. In the case of Nixon, he KNEW it it was irrefutable, so resigned. In his case, the end was deemed inevitable. Impeachment and removal from office. Not enough evidence for Trump?
Exposed for being wrong, as you usually are in every thread you post.
Nixon resigned because the senate told him they were gonna convict, Trump doesn't have to worry about that in the current climate. The GOP are such fucking pussies that they're refusing to pass the same bill that passed 100-0 to re-open the government, you're free to look for comments from GOP senators brushing off the felonies we're talking about as "inconsequential" and "not a big deal".
As far as a court making statements by the court...really? So what? Courts dont get things wrong? Need I remind of you of a dumb Texas judge's ruling that made national news?
Courts do make mistakes, you're right about that.
Pretending that a decision on whether a law is constitutional and testimony under oath that someone is implicated in a felony are the same is a false equivalency. This isn't some nebulous legal argument, if what Cohen said under oath is true (and it 99% is) Trump is guilty. If this was any other citizen he'd have been indicted and dragged to court, fortunately for him he's the president.