No, I have a better idea, let's do absolutely nothing. That way we can be assured of the worst possible outcome.
Doing something just for the sake of doing something seems silly. What if it does nothing but shift wealth around and make (some) people feel better about themselves?
Doing something just for the sake of doing something seems silly. What if it does nothing but shift wealth around and make (some) people feel better about themselves?
Better world?
Any action to stop, and I mean ACTUALLY STOP, CO2 this century would devastate human industry. Our prosperity would come to a screeching halt.
Better world?
Any action to stop, and I mean ACTUALLY STOP, CO2 this century would devastate human industry. Our prosperity would come to a screeching halt.
It's unlikely, imho.
The change in weather is nothing but trends. Trends that have come and gone 1,000's of times in the past. You can't really judge weather on a daily basis, and hardly on a yearly basis. You have to look at it in decades/centuries and we've barely been keeping scientific track of the weather for a century.
Can man cause a small amount of global warming? Of course. Does it matter? Probably not.
No shits given.
Why stress about things you have no control over?
Yeah, better, not best. To say "since we can't fix every problem in our lifetimes we should do nothing" is fucking retarded.
I'm all for ignoring what we can't control, but there are still plenty of things we can control and many of those things can have a direct impact on the current generation.
It's funny how idiot republicans say that they're all worried about leaving debt for the following generations, but don't give a fuck about leaving a planet those generations can actually survive on.
It's funny how idiot republicans say that they're all worried about leaving debt for the following generations, but don't give a fuck about leaving a planet those generations can actually survive on.
And what are those costs exactly?
Straw man? No one is saying stop cold turkey.
They're advocating for throwing money at green tech and taxing polluters. The financial costs associated with climate change are going to dwarf these costs.
Oh, and then there's the worst case scenario of causing the fall of human civilization, or even extinction of humanity.
global climate change caused by man is the fairy tale.
though perhaps cave men had gasoline powered cars and coal power plants to turn the Ice Age around? :hmm:
![]()
I favor solar, thorium fission, and fusion research and development.
Then... assuming the UN claims are 100% true, I suggest you all move off the beach. Because the year 2100 will come roaring in and global economies will still largely be emitting CO2.
I favor solar, thorium fission, and fusion research and development.
Taxes won't do anything.
I'll buy you some tin foil and clear that right up.
Aren't favoring any of the above reducing C02, and you'd be pretty much contradicting yourself at that point ?
