Israel / Gaza Thread

[kylebisme]

Yeah, we already have the black magic goat thread for mindless superstition, there is no reason to bring such nonsense into the Israel/Palestine conflict.

 

[ChunkiMunki]

Originally posted by: TheSnowman
Yeah, we already have the black magic goat thread for mindless superstition, there is no reason to bring such nonsense into the Israel/Palestine conflict.

ha ha good one snow :laugh:

 

[ZzZGuy]

Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Hows this . Even tho he says we have NO Choice I say YOU DO . Please for your spirit just say NO its your chouce . You can't stop it but you do not need to part take, Go threw the suffering of resistance.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...0SGzxY&feature=related

LOL, thanks for the laugh.

Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Why's everyone so scared. The a Reason for it. Once the world population sees this thing all hells going to break loose . So they need to make something happen.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...khKOrI&feature=related

One guy full of it, the other (Powell) whatever the hell he ment, it's the 24th according to my computers clock unless it has been hacked.

........ ARG, my tinfoil is gone! Those *******s.

 

[palehorse]

Originally posted by: Lemon law
The Jaskalas fallacy here is to assume that one doctor, working in one hospital has any kind of a larger perspective of what is happening in around him, in a much larger area with 1.5 million people or so.

wait... isn't that what you always do whenever TGB opens his mouth regarding Pakistan?!

woops!

 

[Nemesis 1]

Don't get me wrong . right now I like what obama is saying. He says it well.

I just want to see his actions and how they go about this. If Obama is good for US he will gradually pull us out of things we can't understand. Get peace today the the right way . So many steps can lead to tradedy. Only a few to success. But Obama has said things that have me very nerveus for america. Thats living day today. I also believe more than obama can control is going on here. But one still has to live day to day.

 

[mrSHEiK124]

I've been gone from this thread for too long.

Truther videos and Pakistan? What?

 

[JEDIYoda]

Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Don't get me wrong . right now I like what obama is saying. He says it well.

I just want to see his actions and how they go about this. If Obama is good for US he will gradually pull us out of things we can't understand. Get peace today the the right way . So many steps can lead to tradedy. Only a few to success. But Obama has said things that have me very nerveus for america. Thats living day today. I also believe more than obama can control is going on here. But one still has to live day to day.

boohoo!! sometimes the truth will make you nervous!!!

Sheese he`s been in office what a week now.......sheese...

 

[Nemesis 1]

The Words we have NO Choice sets well with you I see. But the other part were we have to do more than in the past. I bet thats the part your likeing . Obama said these things none can deny it.

 

[MotF Bane]

Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
The Words we have NO Choice sets well with you I see. But the other part were we have to do more than in the past. I bet thats the part your likeing . Obama said these things none can deny it.

Go back to first grade English.

 

[theflyingpig]

Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Why's everyone so scared. The a Reason for it. Once the world population sees this thing all hells going to break loose . So they need to make something happen.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...khKOrI&feature=related

A GENERATED CRYSIS. youre' corect my gould freind. dont not listen to peple here they know nothig. They simplie can't see the TURTH.

 

[palehorse]

Originally posted by: theflyingpig

Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Why's everyone so scared. The a Reason for it. Once the world population sees this thing all hells going to break loose . So they need to make something happen.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...khKOrI&feature=related

A GENERATED CRYSIS. youre' corect my gould freind. dont not listen to peple here they know nothig. They simplie can't see the TURTH.

LOL! :laugh:

wait, you were mocking him, right?

 

[Craig234]

Originally posted by: Common Courtesy

Originally posted by: Craig234
[Another part of the answer to CC: the US needs to stop blindly and corruptly abusing its veto power to block any measure the world agrees on affecting Israel.

For many years, the vetos were due to the Soviet/Arab camp generating resolutions that would be favorable to the Arabs at the expense of Israel.

The UN only resolves conflicts when it goes into an area in force and stays active in seperating the combatants. If the UN sits in their camps, then it is up to the combatants to honor any agreement.

If the US feels that a resolution unfairly targets Israel then it has the right/obligation to veto it.

Total BS. First, the USSR can make all the resolutions it wants - that gets them a very small number of votes, a far cry from the sort of 180+ to 2 (Israel and the US) votes we've seen. That's the world, not the USSR, even with all the leverage we can muster for arm-twisting as the world's only superpower, and it's dishonest of you to imply it was only some corrupt USSR measure, and it's a clear indiication of *our* corruption to ignore justice to support Irael, not because 'we think it's unfair'.

That's what happens when you go putting yourself in a position to be blackmailed by doing things like letting another nation be your middleman in illegal missile sales to Iran.

I find your 'defense' of our abuse of the veto power for our own power play at the expense of any justice for Palastenians, pretending they're not what they are, to be very false.

 

[dahunan]

Originally posted by: freshgeardude

Originally posted by: Lemon law

Originally posted by: freshgeardude
snowman, I find it amusing that, It was not the fact that the land mass was 30% or double or even smaller than Israel, it was that you continue to give false AND conflicting information. I repeat, I am not arguing about the numbers, im arguing that you can never give a single straight answer, and rather you edit or say you are wrong, you try and mock me for telling everyone you are wrong.

this is the problem, people think they know the conflict, they spread their own propaganda and change their views to make it look like they are the right ones. you are starting to sound like an anti-semetic person

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah yes, play the anti-semetic card, the last refuge of scoundrels, but a wee mite difficult when the Palestinians are also a semetic people.

I know that they are semetic people. im not assuming he is a semetic person, I just think he is anti semetic

edit: or shall I rephrase that, anti-jewish

LOL
People who don't kiss Israels ass are EITHER
1. Anti-Semite or Anti-Jewish
2. Terrorist Sympathizers
3. Supporters or terrorists who use women and children as shields

........... You people are total hacks and if you weren't such violent peoples would be LOL.. but .. sad... you are God's Chosen who think soil is woth stealing at any costs because it is Holy.. *so lets spill blood all over it to retake ownership.. and because God said so.. that is your land.. right?

 

[dahunan]

Originally posted by: jonks

Originally posted by: Lemon law
While Israel with drew from Gaza before Obama was inaugurated, it now looks like Obama may have to weigh in as many serious groups are charging Israel with war crimes over the the use of white phosphorous
shells in the Gaza incursion, I wish I could find the link but it seems gone from where I remember seeing it.

But if the Israeli war crimes issue hits the UN, we may get one of two clear indications of future Obama policy regarding his future mid-east policy stance with the Israeli Palestinian dispure.

(1) Obama many instruct our UN Ambassador to veto any probes. (2) Obama may decide not to veto any such probes.

And then there may be an Obama transparent policy, of vetoing this time with a private or semi private warning sent to Israel that this will be the last time we will save Israel's butt on any war crimes charges.
And since a totally private message will cause Israel to call out its pro-Israeli lobby to sic on Obama, he might as well make any Israeli warnings more publicly.

Jesus fucking christ. Hamas launches rockets for months at civilian populations, blows up discos and buses and weddings, and you think Israel are the war criminals. If Israel wanted to level all of palestine, it is within its power to do so. It chooses not to. If Hamas had the means to wreak more havoc and destruction on Israel it would do so immediately. If Obama doesn't push for prosucting war crimes a nation under perpetual terrorist attack that has shown remarkable restraint then it will say very little about him other than that he's not a fucking idiot.

Chicken or the Egg.. come on.. you only SEE ONE SIDE... and that should be your embarassment

 

[RichardE]

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: jonks

Originally posted by: Lemon law
While Israel with drew from Gaza before Obama was inaugurated, it now looks like Obama may have to weigh in as many serious groups are charging Israel with war crimes over the the use of white phosphorous
shells in the Gaza incursion, I wish I could find the link but it seems gone from where I remember seeing it.

But if the Israeli war crimes issue hits the UN, we may get one of two clear indications of future Obama policy regarding his future mid-east policy stance with the Israeli Palestinian dispure.

(1) Obama many instruct our UN Ambassador to veto any probes. (2) Obama may decide not to veto any such probes.

And then there may be an Obama transparent policy, of vetoing this time with a private or semi private warning sent to Israel that this will be the last time we will save Israel's butt on any war crimes charges.
And since a totally private message will cause Israel to call out its pro-Israeli lobby to sic on Obama, he might as well make any Israeli warnings more publicly.

Jesus fucking christ. Hamas launches rockets for months at civilian populations, blows up discos and buses and weddings, and you think Israel are the war criminals. If Israel wanted to level all of palestine, it is within its power to do so. It chooses not to. If Hamas had the means to wreak more havoc and destruction on Israel it would do so immediately. If Obama doesn't push for prosucting war crimes a nation under perpetual terrorist attack that has shown remarkable restraint then it will say very little about him other than that he's not a fucking idiot.

Chicken or the Egg.. come on.. you only SEE ONE SIDE... and that should be your embarassment

Says the master of seeing one side :laugh: Still running from those big bad scary jews Dahunan?

 

[dahunan]

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: jonks

Originally posted by: Lemon law
While Israel with drew from Gaza before Obama was inaugurated, it now looks like Obama may have to weigh in as many serious groups are charging Israel with war crimes over the the use of white phosphorous
shells in the Gaza incursion, I wish I could find the link but it seems gone from where I remember seeing it.

But if the Israeli war crimes issue hits the UN, we may get one of two clear indications of future Obama policy regarding his future mid-east policy stance with the Israeli Palestinian dispure.

(1) Obama many instruct our UN Ambassador to veto any probes. (2) Obama may decide not to veto any such probes.

And then there may be an Obama transparent policy, of vetoing this time with a private or semi private warning sent to Israel that this will be the last time we will save Israel's butt on any war crimes charges.
And since a totally private message will cause Israel to call out its pro-Israeli lobby to sic on Obama, he might as well make any Israeli warnings more publicly.

Jesus fucking christ. Hamas launches rockets for months at civilian populations, blows up discos and buses and weddings, and you think Israel are the war criminals. If Israel wanted to level all of palestine, it is within its power to do so. It chooses not to. If Hamas had the means to wreak more havoc and destruction on Israel it would do so immediately. If Obama doesn't push for prosucting war crimes a nation under perpetual terrorist attack that has shown remarkable restraint then it will say very little about him other than that he's not a fucking idiot.

Chicken or the Egg.. come on.. you only SEE ONE SIDE... and that should be your embarassment

Says the master of seeing one side :laugh: Still running from those big bad scary jews Dahunan?

Do you expect anyone, even yourself, to believe you are even 1% impartial...lol.. wow.. you are the one who had the wargasm when the bombs started killing palestinian citizens and made sure to link us to some of your war porn?? WHATEVER... Here.. I will give you one of these also :laugh:
Reminder.. like. .. what.. a max of 15% of the TOTAL population actually voted for that govt?

 

[RichardE]

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: jonks

Originally posted by: Lemon law
While Israel with drew from Gaza before Obama was inaugurated, it now looks like Obama may have to weigh in as many serious groups are charging Israel with war crimes over the the use of white phosphorous
shells in the Gaza incursion, I wish I could find the link but it seems gone from where I remember seeing it.

But if the Israeli war crimes issue hits the UN, we may get one of two clear indications of future Obama policy regarding his future mid-east policy stance with the Israeli Palestinian dispure.

(1) Obama many instruct our UN Ambassador to veto any probes. (2) Obama may decide not to veto any such probes.

And then there may be an Obama transparent policy, of vetoing this time with a private or semi private warning sent to Israel that this will be the last time we will save Israel's butt on any war crimes charges.
And since a totally private message will cause Israel to call out its pro-Israeli lobby to sic on Obama, he might as well make any Israeli warnings more publicly.

Jesus fucking christ. Hamas launches rockets for months at civilian populations, blows up discos and buses and weddings, and you think Israel are the war criminals. If Israel wanted to level all of palestine, it is within its power to do so. It chooses not to. If Hamas had the means to wreak more havoc and destruction on Israel it would do so immediately. If Obama doesn't push for prosucting war crimes a nation under perpetual terrorist attack that has shown remarkable restraint then it will say very little about him other than that he's not a fucking idiot.

Chicken or the Egg.. come on.. you only SEE ONE SIDE... and that should be your embarassment

Says the master of seeing one side :laugh: Still running from those big bad scary jews Dahunan?

Do you expect anyone, even yourself, to believe you are even 1% impartial...lol.. wow.. you are the one who had the wargasm when the bombs started killing palestinian citizens and made sure to link us to some of your war porn?? WHATEVER... Here.. I will give you one of these also :laugh:
Reminder.. like. .. what.. a max of 15% of the TOTAL population actually voted for that govt?

At least I wasn't jacking off when I started hearing about dead jews and the Hamas killing there own in a martyr war like you were, sitting there cheering over Hamas "giving it back to the jews!"

 

[dahunan]

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: jonks

Originally posted by: Lemon law
While Israel with drew from Gaza before Obama was inaugurated, it now looks like Obama may have to weigh in as many serious groups are charging Israel with war crimes over the the use of white phosphorous
shells in the Gaza incursion, I wish I could find the link but it seems gone from where I remember seeing it.

But if the Israeli war crimes issue hits the UN, we may get one of two clear indications of future Obama policy regarding his future mid-east policy stance with the Israeli Palestinian dispure.

(1) Obama many instruct our UN Ambassador to veto any probes. (2) Obama may decide not to veto any such probes.

And then there may be an Obama transparent policy, of vetoing this time with a private or semi private warning sent to Israel that this will be the last time we will save Israel's butt on any war crimes charges.
And since a totally private message will cause Israel to call out its pro-Israeli lobby to sic on Obama, he might as well make any Israeli warnings more publicly.

Jesus fucking christ. Hamas launches rockets for months at civilian populations, blows up discos and buses and weddings, and you think Israel are the war criminals. If Israel wanted to level all of palestine, it is within its power to do so. It chooses not to. If Hamas had the means to wreak more havoc and destruction on Israel it would do so immediately. If Obama doesn't push for prosucting war crimes a nation under perpetual terrorist attack that has shown remarkable restraint then it will say very little about him other than that he's not a fucking idiot.

Chicken or the Egg.. come on.. you only SEE ONE SIDE... and that should be your embarassment

Says the master of seeing one side :laugh: Still running from those big bad scary jews Dahunan?

Do you expect anyone, even yourself, to believe you are even 1% impartial...lol.. wow.. you are the one who had the wargasm when the bombs started killing palestinian citizens and made sure to link us to some of your war porn?? WHATEVER... Here.. I will give you one of these also :laugh:
Reminder.. like. .. what.. a max of 15% of the TOTAL population actually voted for that govt?

At least I wasn't jacking off when I started hearing about dead jews and the Hamas killing there own in a martyr war like you were, sitting there cheering over Hamas "giving it back to the jews!"

Find the quotes to back it up war porn boy << that is you... On the first day of the offensive you found links to show us all your pride in Israeli Military bombs and weaponry .. and jumped with glee as they also reigned down terror on the shooting barrel you call Gaza..

 

[Freshgeardude]

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: jonks

Originally posted by: Lemon law
While Israel with drew from Gaza before Obama was inaugurated, it now looks like Obama may have to weigh in as many serious groups are charging Israel with war crimes over the the use of white phosphorous
shells in the Gaza incursion, I wish I could find the link but it seems gone from where I remember seeing it.

But if the Israeli war crimes issue hits the UN, we may get one of two clear indications of future Obama policy regarding his future mid-east policy stance with the Israeli Palestinian dispure.

(1) Obama many instruct our UN Ambassador to veto any probes. (2) Obama may decide not to veto any such probes.

And then there may be an Obama transparent policy, of vetoing this time with a private or semi private warning sent to Israel that this will be the last time we will save Israel's butt on any war crimes charges.
And since a totally private message will cause Israel to call out its pro-Israeli lobby to sic on Obama, he might as well make any Israeli warnings more publicly.

Jesus fucking christ. Hamas launches rockets for months at civilian populations, blows up discos and buses and weddings, and you think Israel are the war criminals. If Israel wanted to level all of palestine, it is within its power to do so. It chooses not to. If Hamas had the means to wreak more havoc and destruction on Israel it would do so immediately. If Obama doesn't push for prosucting war crimes a nation under perpetual terrorist attack that has shown remarkable restraint then it will say very little about him other than that he's not a fucking idiot.

Chicken or the Egg.. come on.. you only SEE ONE SIDE... and that should be your embarassment

Says the master of seeing one side :laugh: Still running from those big bad scary jews Dahunan?

Do you expect anyone, even yourself, to believe you are even 1% impartial...lol.. wow.. you are the one who had the wargasm when the bombs started killing palestinian citizens and made sure to link us to some of your war porn?? WHATEVER... Here.. I will give you one of these also :laugh:
Reminder.. like. .. what.. a max of 15% of the TOTAL population actually voted for that govt?

At least I wasn't jacking off when I started hearing about dead jews and the Hamas killing there own in a martyr war like you were, sitting there cheering over Hamas "giving it back to the jews!"

Find the quotes to back it up war porn boy << that is you... On the first day of the offensive you found links to show us all your pride in Israeli Military bombs and weaponry .. and jumped with glee as they also reigned down terror on the shooting barrel you call Gaza..

sorry, I defend These people over These people

 

[JEDIYoda]

Originally posted by: freshgeardude

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: jonks

Originally posted by: Lemon law
While Israel with drew from Gaza before Obama was inaugurated, it now looks like Obama may have to weigh in as many serious groups are charging Israel with war crimes over the the use of white phosphorous
shells in the Gaza incursion, I wish I could find the link but it seems gone from where I remember seeing it.

But if the Israeli war crimes issue hits the UN, we may get one of two clear indications of future Obama policy regarding his future mid-east policy stance with the Israeli Palestinian dispure.

(1) Obama many instruct our UN Ambassador to veto any probes. (2) Obama may decide not to veto any such probes.

And then there may be an Obama transparent policy, of vetoing this time with a private or semi private warning sent to Israel that this will be the last time we will save Israel's butt on any war crimes charges.
And since a totally private message will cause Israel to call out its pro-Israeli lobby to sic on Obama, he might as well make any Israeli warnings more publicly.

Jesus fucking christ. Hamas launches rockets for months at civilian populations, blows up discos and buses and weddings, and you think Israel are the war criminals. If Israel wanted to level all of palestine, it is within its power to do so. It chooses not to. If Hamas had the means to wreak more havoc and destruction on Israel it would do so immediately. If Obama doesn't push for prosucting war crimes a nation under perpetual terrorist attack that has shown remarkable restraint then it will say very little about him other than that he's not a fucking idiot.

Chicken or the Egg.. come on.. you only SEE ONE SIDE... and that should be your embarassment

Says the master of seeing one side :laugh: Still running from those big bad scary jews Dahunan?

Do you expect anyone, even yourself, to believe you are even 1% impartial...lol.. wow.. you are the one who had the wargasm when the bombs started killing palestinian citizens and made sure to link us to some of your war porn?? WHATEVER... Here.. I will give you one of these also :laugh:
Reminder.. like. .. what.. a max of 15% of the TOTAL population actually voted for that govt?

At least I wasn't jacking off when I started hearing about dead jews and the Hamas killing there own in a martyr war like you were, sitting there cheering over Hamas "giving it back to the jews!"

Find the quotes to back it up war porn boy << that is you... On the first day of the offensive you found links to show us all your pride in Israeli Military bombs and weaponry .. and jumped with glee as they also reigned down terror on the shooting barrel you call Gaza..

sorry, I defend These people over These people

That`s righteous~!!!

 

[dahunan]

Originally posted by: JEDIYoda

Originally posted by: freshgeardude

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: jonks

Originally posted by: Lemon law
While Israel with drew from Gaza before Obama was inaugurated, it now looks like Obama may have to weigh in as many serious groups are charging Israel with war crimes over the the use of white phosphorous
shells in the Gaza incursion, I wish I could find the link but it seems gone from where I remember seeing it.

But if the Israeli war crimes issue hits the UN, we may get one of two clear indications of future Obama policy regarding his future mid-east policy stance with the Israeli Palestinian dispure.

(1) Obama many instruct our UN Ambassador to veto any probes. (2) Obama may decide not to veto any such probes.

And then there may be an Obama transparent policy, of vetoing this time with a private or semi private warning sent to Israel that this will be the last time we will save Israel's butt on any war crimes charges.
And since a totally private message will cause Israel to call out its pro-Israeli lobby to sic on Obama, he might as well make any Israeli warnings more publicly.

Jesus fucking christ. Hamas launches rockets for months at civilian populations, blows up discos and buses and weddings, and you think Israel are the war criminals. If Israel wanted to level all of palestine, it is within its power to do so. It chooses not to. If Hamas had the means to wreak more havoc and destruction on Israel it would do so immediately. If Obama doesn't push for prosucting war crimes a nation under perpetual terrorist attack that has shown remarkable restraint then it will say very little about him other than that he's not a fucking idiot.

Chicken or the Egg.. come on.. you only SEE ONE SIDE... and that should be your embarassment

Says the master of seeing one side :laugh: Still running from those big bad scary jews Dahunan?

Do you expect anyone, even yourself, to believe you are even 1% impartial...lol.. wow.. you are the one who had the wargasm when the bombs started killing palestinian citizens and made sure to link us to some of your war porn?? WHATEVER... Here.. I will give you one of these also :laugh:
Reminder.. like. .. what.. a max of 15% of the TOTAL population actually voted for that govt?

At least I wasn't jacking off when I started hearing about dead jews and the Hamas killing there own in a martyr war like you were, sitting there cheering over Hamas "giving it back to the jews!"

Find the quotes to back it up war porn boy << that is you... On the first day of the offensive you found links to show us all your pride in Israeli Military bombs and weaponry .. and jumped with glee as they also reigned down terror on the shooting barrel you call Gaza..

sorry, I defend These people over These people

That`s righteous~!!!

lol.. not even worth watching from him... FGD is more biased than Farrakhan..

Shit.. like two little youtube videos are enough to clear up all the confusion and bias.. Just like when they don't like what you say.. they then choose to call you an anti-semite or a jewhater or a supporter of terrorists who use women as shields

 

[RichardE]

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: JEDIYoda

Originally posted by: freshgeardude

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: jonks

Originally posted by: Lemon law
While Israel with drew from Gaza before Obama was inaugurated, it now looks like Obama may have to weigh in as many serious groups are charging Israel with war crimes over the the use of white phosphorous
shells in the Gaza incursion, I wish I could find the link but it seems gone from where I remember seeing it.

But if the Israeli war crimes issue hits the UN, we may get one of two clear indications of future Obama policy regarding his future mid-east policy stance with the Israeli Palestinian dispure.

(1) Obama many instruct our UN Ambassador to veto any probes. (2) Obama may decide not to veto any such probes.

And then there may be an Obama transparent policy, of vetoing this time with a private or semi private warning sent to Israel that this will be the last time we will save Israel's butt on any war crimes charges.
And since a totally private message will cause Israel to call out its pro-Israeli lobby to sic on Obama, he might as well make any Israeli warnings more publicly.

Jesus fucking christ. Hamas launches rockets for months at civilian populations, blows up discos and buses and weddings, and you think Israel are the war criminals. If Israel wanted to level all of palestine, it is within its power to do so. It chooses not to. If Hamas had the means to wreak more havoc and destruction on Israel it would do so immediately. If Obama doesn't push for prosucting war crimes a nation under perpetual terrorist attack that has shown remarkable restraint then it will say very little about him other than that he's not a fucking idiot.

Chicken or the Egg.. come on.. you only SEE ONE SIDE... and that should be your embarassment

Says the master of seeing one side :laugh: Still running from those big bad scary jews Dahunan?

Do you expect anyone, even yourself, to believe you are even 1% impartial...lol.. wow.. you are the one who had the wargasm when the bombs started killing palestinian citizens and made sure to link us to some of your war porn?? WHATEVER... Here.. I will give you one of these also :laugh:
Reminder.. like. .. what.. a max of 15% of the TOTAL population actually voted for that govt?

At least I wasn't jacking off when I started hearing about dead jews and the Hamas killing there own in a martyr war like you were, sitting there cheering over Hamas "giving it back to the jews!"

Find the quotes to back it up war porn boy << that is you... On the first day of the offensive you found links to show us all your pride in Israeli Military bombs and weaponry .. and jumped with glee as they also reigned down terror on the shooting barrel you call Gaza..

sorry, I defend These people over These people

That`s righteous~!!!

lol.. not even worth watching from him... FGD is more biased than Farrakhan..

Shit.. like two little youtube videos are enough to clear up all the confusion and bias.. Just like when they don't like what you say.. they then choose to call you an anti-semite or a jewhater or a supporter of terrorists who use women as shields

Got your ovens heated up yet? :laugh:

 

[Freshgeardude]

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: JEDIYoda

Originally posted by: freshgeardude

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: jonks

Originally posted by: Lemon law
While Israel with drew from Gaza before Obama was inaugurated, it now looks like Obama may have to weigh in as many serious groups are charging Israel with war crimes over the the use of white phosphorous
shells in the Gaza incursion, I wish I could find the link but it seems gone from where I remember seeing it.

But if the Israeli war crimes issue hits the UN, we may get one of two clear indications of future Obama policy regarding his future mid-east policy stance with the Israeli Palestinian dispure.

(1) Obama many instruct our UN Ambassador to veto any probes. (2) Obama may decide not to veto any such probes.

And then there may be an Obama transparent policy, of vetoing this time with a private or semi private warning sent to Israel that this will be the last time we will save Israel's butt on any war crimes charges.
And since a totally private message will cause Israel to call out its pro-Israeli lobby to sic on Obama, he might as well make any Israeli warnings more publicly.

Jesus fucking christ. Hamas launches rockets for months at civilian populations, blows up discos and buses and weddings, and you think Israel are the war criminals. If Israel wanted to level all of palestine, it is within its power to do so. It chooses not to. If Hamas had the means to wreak more havoc and destruction on Israel it would do so immediately. If Obama doesn't push for prosucting war crimes a nation under perpetual terrorist attack that has shown remarkable restraint then it will say very little about him other than that he's not a fucking idiot.

Chicken or the Egg.. come on.. you only SEE ONE SIDE... and that should be your embarassment

Says the master of seeing one side :laugh: Still running from those big bad scary jews Dahunan?

Do you expect anyone, even yourself, to believe you are even 1% impartial...lol.. wow.. you are the one who had the wargasm when the bombs started killing palestinian citizens and made sure to link us to some of your war porn?? WHATEVER... Here.. I will give you one of these also :laugh:
Reminder.. like. .. what.. a max of 15% of the TOTAL population actually voted for that govt?

At least I wasn't jacking off when I started hearing about dead jews and the Hamas killing there own in a martyr war like you were, sitting there cheering over Hamas "giving it back to the jews!"

Find the quotes to back it up war porn boy << that is you... On the first day of the offensive you found links to show us all your pride in Israeli Military bombs and weaponry .. and jumped with glee as they also reigned down terror on the shooting barrel you call Gaza..

sorry, I defend These people over These people

That`s righteous~!!!

lol.. not even worth watching from him... FGD is more biased than Farrakhan..

Shit.. like two little youtube videos are enough to clear up all the confusion and bias.. Just like when they don't like what you say.. they then choose to call you an anti-semite or a jewhater or a supporter of terrorists who use women as shields

you cant watch 2 lousy sub minute youtube videos? and your not biased? any and all things you think will make you think that Israel is good and hamas are things you wont watch?

 

[kylebisme]

Here are some interviews worth seeing, both Palestinians and West Bank settlers:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTD26rQzhvE

The display of cognitive dissonance from the settlers is disturbing.

 

[Freshgeardude]

like I've said before. I understand your statement about Israel colonizing in the west bank, but what you havent comprehended is that when the arab nations started and lost war with Israel, Israel is going to take land to defend itself.


secondly, I still havent heard a single response from you about how small the land that israel controls in the west bank compared to the arab countries surrounding it. thirdly, you never responded to the quotes in islamic text says jews are enemies, nor how countries are how they are because of the islamic population.

fourthly, the people of the west bank and gaza should be happy for what they have because their so called arab brethren dont care about them, and groups like hamas use them to hide under

fifthly, you never responded to the comment where it said something like " a lot of the palestinians left during 1948 because the arab countries told them that they will wipe israel off the map and they will be able to return to their homes. on top of the fact that most of them never even saw an Israeli soldier"