nick1985
Lifer
- Dec 29, 2002
- 27,158
- 6
- 81
costs
But they said it would bend the cost curve down. They said once they passed it we will love it.
Is this not true?
costs
Still trying to figure it out...obamacare
111 companies and growing.
I LOL'd at number 81.
81. CIGNA 9/17/2010 9/26/2010 265,000 9/30/2010 9/30/2010
Really? One would imagine they get VERY inexpensive health coverage, since, you know, that's their business and all.
Yes, what could be more American than shutting down a company because it opts out of a fascist policy?Every one of these Anti-American companies should be boycotted and shutdown immediately.
111 companies and growing.
http://www.hhs.gov/ociio/regulations/approved_applications_for_waiver.html
Various unions, insurers, Dish Network, grocery chains, restaurants and so on.
It's so good, everybody wants out.
But they said it would bend the cost curve down. They said once they passed it we will love it.
Is this not true?
Ah, so it's my job to subsidize healthcare for the smoker down the street who eats a pound of bacon with every meal? Seems appropriate. I'll think about how fair that is while on my morning jog and eating Raisin Bran for breakfast. Maybe you guys should take a course in statistics rather than simply parroting what your "betters" sent you in your e-mail this morning. Or, you could simply admit that this is just another way for the douchebags of your generation to take everything from my generation at the expense of our future opportunities.
Err, yes it is your job and all of ours to subsidize their cost. Don't you selfish conservatives realize that it's in the nation's best interests to keep EVERYONE healthy!? Once everyone has "insurance" they'll be more preventative programs and these people that are unhealthy now because of a lack of insurance will be healthier in the future. Diseases will be caught earlier and treated earlier. Don't you realize you're already indirectly subsidizing them now because of their non-payment? If the hospitals can't get money from those that can't pay, they increase the rate on those that can. Also a public option would have helped by covering those at higher risk (low income). Hopefully a public option will be introduced in the future.
Yes, what could be more American than shutting down a company because it opts out of a fascist policy?
Don't like it, you and those companies are free to leave.
Go quickly thank you
Ah, so it's my job to subsidize healthcare for the smoker down the street who eats a pound of bacon with every meal? Seems appropriate. I'll think about how fair that is while on my morning jog and eating Raisin Bran for breakfast. Maybe you guys should take a course in statistics rather than simply parroting what your "betters" sent you in your e-mail this morning. Or, you could simply admit that this is just another way for the douchebags of your generation to take everything from my generation at the expense of our future opportunities.
I'm not sure if this was sarcastic or not, but I hope so. If not, read the following paragraph.Err, yes it is your job and all of ours to subsidize their cost. Don't you selfish conservatives realize that it's in the nation's best interests to keep EVERYONE healthy!? Once everyone has "insurance" they'll be more preventative programs and these people that are unhealthy now because of a lack of insurance will be healthier in the future. Diseases will be caught earlier and treated earlier. Don't you realize you're already indirectly subsidizing them now because of their non-payment? If the hospitals can't get money from those that can't pay, they increase the rate on those that can. Also a public option would have helped by covering those at higher risk (low income). Hopefully a public option will be introduced in the future.
Medical decisions should be left to doctors not the suits. The suits only care about profit, they are the definition of greed.
I didn't realize we were having a competition to see who could squeeze the most fallacies into a single post.But I am a libertarian who doesnt use public roads, or 911 or take advantage of anything the government does for me so why should I pay it.
If I get into a car accident I fully expect the paramedics to leave me there to die because I want to be free.....
Again see larger pools in Hawaii and Romneycare and get back to us with facts....
Would we have been better off with a singlepayer system?
BUT THAT WOULD BE SOCIALIST>>>>>
btw I am firmly for a singlepayer system to drive down costs...
False dilemma. We could simply repeal laws requiring hospitals to foot the bill for stabilizing patients who can't afford to pay for the treatment due to their own poor life choices.You can either subsidize his $50 office visit and subsequent cheapo bp medication, or have your hospital write off $50k when he shows up at the ER with a stroke or heart attack. Your choice.
(Hint: $49,950 buys a lot of raisin bran)
Your hero is the one giving these companies a pass. Aren't you pleased with your decision?Don't like it, you and those companies are free to leave.
Go quickly thank you
I'm not sure if this was sarcastic or not, but I hope so. If not, read the following paragraph.
Anyone who can say what you said at all seriously is a fascist. You want me to subsidize care for the people who made poor life choices because I have made good life choices. Freedom cuts both ways, but everything you have stated here is exactly opposite to freedom. You want to penalize me for doing what is right and reward those who have done what is wrong. If I am free to make choices, I must also be free to deal with the consequences of those choices. Instead, you want to saddle me with the consequences of the bad choices someone else has made simply because I made good decisions. That is evil.
Great that you brought that back to the forefront. It's gotten lost in the shuffle.I still think is pretty fucked up that no members of Congress are going to be covered by this POS legislation so they can get the same shit they are shoveling.
Your hero is the one giving these companies a pass. Aren't you pleased with your decision?
False dilemma. We could simply repeal laws requiring hospitals to foot the bill for stabilizing patients who can't afford to pay for the treatment due to their own poor life choices.