Is the .22 caliber even close to being adaquate for self defense use?

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

happy medium

Lifer
Jun 8, 2003
14,387
480
126
Not if the other guy has a 44 mag:roll:

Yea it's good just make sure you empty the clip in them!
In philly they carry Bazookas
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
This thread reminds me of the movie quote - the fact that you've got "REPLICA" written down the side of your gun, and the fact that I've got "DESERT EAGLE .50" written down the side of mine, should precipitate your balls into shrinking along with your presence.
 

adairusmc

Diamond Member
Jul 24, 2006
7,095
78
91
Originally posted by: happy medium
Not if the other guy has a 44 mag:roll:

Yea it's good just make sure you empty the clip in them!
In philly they carry Bazookas


I think it would be better to empty a magazine in them rather than a clip.

 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Originally posted by: Injury
I don't care what caliber it is, if you get shot, it's going to hurt like a bitch.

This isn't the movies, people don't take a bullet to the arm and keep walking like nothing happened.

The sheer surprise factor of being shot is going to stop a person long enough to shoot them a few more times.

So yeah, .22 is just dandy for self defense.

However, if you are planning on carrying it rather than keeping it in your desk drawer or some crap, a .22 usually isn't practical for the size, as a lot of them tend to have longer barrels and crap.

But I'm no expert in guns.

Please don't post more in gun threads with your experience in your Starbuck's heading carpool.

Most assailant's probably are not going to be so surprised at being shot...Cafe Latte Chris on the other hand may have a bit of a need to pop a Xanax if hit in line at Panera Bread Co.

:)

To the other guy saying a .22 pistol is loud enough.....that is almost LOLLERSKATES!

 

bloodugly

Golden Member
Apr 27, 2004
1,187
0
0
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: bloodugly
If you're not a great shot, just get a shotgun...pretty damn hard to miss. Its not small, but its effective. Just don't use some weak birdshot in it. I've unfortunately had to rid our ranch of some animal pests ( I seriously hate killing animals), and at 10 yards you can easily take the head pretty much off an animal with one. Immediate and painless death is the way to go if you have to put something down.

You've obviously never fired a shotgun at close range before. Love how people keep saying you cant miss with a shotgun...

Whats really funny is the birdshot load that you are least likely to miss with is the one you are saying not to use!

With my Mossberg 590 20" 12ga with 9 pellet 00 tactical loads all 9 .30 cal pellets strike within a 4" circle at 10 yards. Aim and shot placement are just as essential with a shotgun as any other weapon, more so when you have more than 1 projectile to be accountable for with every shot.

Birdshot just doesn't have enough stopping power at any kind of distance for me to consider it adequate if the desire is pretty much quick death to a human target. I'm not saying it won't totally screw someone up and quite possibly kill them, but 00 buck will have much more of an impact and more likely cause the attacker to go down immediately...especially if they're hopped up on crank or something and can take an abnormally high amount of abuse and fire back. A 4-6 inch spread (depending on the barrel) across a room is certainly alot more spread than you'll get with a single bullet, making it much harder to miss....not impossible, but pretty damn hard if you ever practice much at all. I've used a shotgun plenty up close, and I've never had a problem with missing, even at night on moving targets. If someone is trying to kill me, I'm not really concerned about being accountable for every projectile, so long as the ones that hit him take him out. I could always get new drywall done or buy a new TV. However, in a apartment with neighbors right on the other side of a possibly thin wall, birdshot would be a better choice, just for safety's sake.

 

Injury

Lifer
Jul 19, 2004
13,066
2
81
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Most assailant's probably are not going to be so surprised at being shot...Cafe Latte Chris on the other hand may have a bit of a need to pop a Xanax if hit in line at Panera Bread Co.


BULL.

How many times have you been shot and how many times has it been by a .22?

K, you got as much experience as me then. so stop trying to act like a stereotyping badass you monkey-looking douche.

You act like a .22 and a BB gun have about the same effect.

Just because it's not a definate one shot take-down doesn't mean someone isn't going to be the least bit phased by it. You're just plain retarded if you don't think it would hurt at all. Hell, why not volunteer to get shot with a .22 and prove it? You're apparently all that is man, go for it!
 

Injury

Lifer
Jul 19, 2004
13,066
2
81
Originally posted by: CadetLee
Originally posted by: Injury

But I'm no expert in guns.

I see that. ;) You can get .22lr handguns about the size of your palm.


Yeah, but my assumption is that he wants a gun he can take the to range because he's concerned about the cost of lots of ammo. Who wants to take a palm-sized gun to the range? ;)
 

ValkyrieofHouston

Golden Member
Sep 26, 2005
1,736
0
0
Originally posted by: rivan
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
When it comes to self defense, is the price that big of a concern?

A .22 most certainly can kill someone, but you'd have to hit them in the right place, so if you spend time at the range and can accurately fire in distress, then you can kill someone in one shot.

While a .22 can kill, it's a whole lot pickier about where the killshot lands than say... a .45.

For self defense, I prefer thinking in terms of stopping power. A .38 or .45 will not only make a bigger hole, it'll be a much more persuasive hint to stop chasing/attacking/whatever even if it doesn't kill.


Agreed, a .45 is your best bet for self defense.
 

jlee

Lifer
Sep 12, 2001
48,518
223
106
Originally posted by: Injury
Originally posted by: CadetLee
Originally posted by: Injury

But I'm no expert in guns.

I see that. ;) You can get .22lr handguns about the size of your palm.


Yeah, but my assumption is that he wants a gun he can take the to range because he's concerned about the cost of lots of ammo. Who wants to take a palm-sized gun to the range? ;)

Practice with what you carry.
 

giantpinkbunnyhead

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2005
3,251
1
0
Originally posted by: cubby1223
This thread reminds me of the movie quote - the fact that you've got "REPLICA" written down the side of your gun, and the fact that I've got "DESERT EAGLE .50" written down the side of mine, should precipitate your balls into shrinking along with your presence.

Ah yeah!!! Best line ever. That was from Snatch wasn't it?

 

ValkyrieofHouston

Golden Member
Sep 26, 2005
1,736
0
0
Originally posted by: Injury
I don't care what caliber it is, if you get shot, it's going to hurt like a bitch.

This isn't the movies, people don't take a bullet to the arm and keep walking like nothing happened.

The sheer surprise factor of being shot is going to stop a person long enough to shoot them a few more times.

So yeah, .22 is just dandy for self defense.

However, if you are planning on carrying it rather than keeping it in your desk drawer or some crap, a .22 usually isn't practical for the size, as a lot of them tend to have longer barrels and crap.

But I'm no expert in guns.

Ok, sure... but what about those peeps who have large amount of illicit drugs running through their veins and aren't phased much by bullets cause there bodies don't feel anything? Or someone who is psychotic or dellusional? Just curious about that. I personally would rather feel confident in knowing that one shot is going to knock them on their *ss.
 

giantpinkbunnyhead

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2005
3,251
1
0
Originally posted by: ValkyrieofHouston
Ok, sure... but what about those peeps who have large amount of illicit drugs running through their veins and aren't phased much by bullets cause there bodies don't feel anything? Or someone who is psychotic or dellusional? Just curious about that. I personally would rather feel confident in knowing that one shot is going to knock them on their *ss.

That's pretty much my take. Granted, a .22 might do an acceptable job... but whatever deterrent one claims the .22 has, can be done more effectively with a .44 for example. Is a .22 loud enough to scare the perp? Maybe. A .44? Definitely. One hit kills with a .22? there's a chance. One hit kills with a .44? Bigger chance. I dont know about you guys, but if it came down to my life, I want as many certainties on my side as I can get. "anything you can do, I can do better!" says the .44 to the .22. So... the .22 may be adequate... but when my life is on the line, I want more of a guarantee. Screw the .22. I want the attacker stopped or dead. Now. With the best chance of it happening at my disposal.
 

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
Originally posted by: Injury
I don't care what caliber it is, if you get shot, it's going to hurt like a bitch.

This isn't the movies, people don't take a bullet to the arm and keep walking like nothing happened.
The sheer surprise factor of being shot is going to stop a person long enough to shoot them a few more times.


So yeah, .22 is just dandy for self defense.

However, if you are planning on carrying it rather than keeping it in your desk drawer or some crap, a .22 usually isn't practical for the size, as a lot of them tend to have longer barrels and crap.

But I'm no expert in guns.


Tell that to the FBI agents that were killed in the infamous Miami shootout. They hit the suspects numerous times with their 9mm. The wounds inflicted on the attackers were all fatal hits, as revealed in the autopsies later, but they were up and about still firing back no problem before they collapsed. The 9mm is far more powerful than the .22LR.

Also tell it to the guys overseas who regularly complain that the .223 in FMJ form is ineffective far too often (yes, while often exagerated to some extent, its a known fact that more people have gotten back up and continued fighting after behing shot with the .223 than with the .308 or similar caliber) If the round is ineffective, that means the target is still a threat after being shot, and the .223 is far more capable than the .22LR.

How about the guys you hear about all the time are shot 10 times by police with a 9mm and are able to run from police only to be found dead 3 blocks away slumped over on stairs or a phone booth? Though in this case, he ran and reconsidered his assault as you suggest, but the point is he was up and functioning like normal for several minutes after being shot. That could have been plenty of time for the suspect to continue fighting and endangering the officers.

People don't always drop instantly or run away immediately when they are shot in real life as they do in video games. The human body's ability to deal with trauma like a gunshot wound is incredible. It is unpredictable what will happen, but you?re wrong in assuming that being shot anywhere with any caliber gun will instantly deter any attacker, drugs or no drugs.
 

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
Originally posted by: bloodugly
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: bloodugly
If you're not a great shot, just get a shotgun...pretty damn hard to miss. Its not small, but its effective. Just don't use some weak birdshot in it. I've unfortunately had to rid our ranch of some animal pests ( I seriously hate killing animals), and at 10 yards you can easily take the head pretty much off an animal with one. Immediate and painless death is the way to go if you have to put something down.

You've obviously never fired a shotgun at close range before. Love how people keep saying you cant miss with a shotgun...

Whats really funny is the birdshot load that you are least likely to miss with is the one you are saying not to use!

With my Mossberg 590 20" 12ga with 9 pellet 00 tactical loads all 9 .30 cal pellets strike within a 4" circle at 10 yards. Aim and shot placement are just as essential with a shotgun as any other weapon, more so when you have more than 1 projectile to be accountable for with every shot.

Birdshot just doesn't have enough stopping power at any kind of distance for me to consider it adequate if the desire is pretty much quick death to a human target. I'm not saying it won't totally screw someone up and quite possibly kill them, but 00 buck will have much more of an impact and more likely cause the attacker to go down immediately...especially if they're hopped up on crank or something and can take an abnormally high amount of abuse and fire back. A 4-6 inch spread (depending on the barrel) across a room is certainly alot more spread than you'll get with a single bullet, making it much harder to miss....not impossible, but pretty damn hard if you ever practice much at all. I've used a shotgun plenty up close, and I've never had a problem with missing, even at night on moving targets. If someone is trying to kill me, I'm not really concerned about being accountable for every projectile, so long as the ones that hit him take him out. I could always get new drywall done or buy a new TV. However, in a apartment with neighbors right on the other side of a possibly thin wall, birdshot would be a better choice, just for safety's sake.

I agree birdshot isn't ideal for defense. I was just pointing out the irony that the shotgun load most likely to magically not miss is the one that isn't even that good for defense.

Another thing to consider, is that the 4-6" spread you accept with a shotgun across a room is also a typical size defense grouping when rapid firing a short barreled handgun across that same room. Fire a handgun rapidly at a target 10 yards away and your shots should produce pretty much the same grouping pattern as the shotgun with 00 buck. Even with a single shot from the handgun and allowing for random deviation, the shot from the handgun WILL fall in the same circle as the shotgun grouping.

As far as I?m concerned, that?s the same percentage to hit the target. Of course 9 rounds are delivered at once with the shotgun... I?m not disputing the power of a shotgun with 00 buck, I'm only comparing accuracy and pointing out that the 'you can't miss' claim with shotguns is false. As I've demonstrated above, aiming at the same spot, the single shot from a handgun will lie in the same grouping with a single shot of 00 buck; ie: same chance of that 4-6" circle as a whole either hitting or missing. I won't consider 'what if the circle is half on half off on the edge of the target' scenarios because you should be aiming center of mass, and if it was simply a difficult shot that missed its mark, a grazing shot with a shotgun mandates a follow up shot just as much as a total miss with a handgun.

However, the primary accuracy advantage of the shotgun isn't unique to the shotgun, it applies to all long arms: larger sight radius due to the longer barrel provides better visual feedback with respect to movement, shaking, etc. The movement of a longer barrel will have a more pronounced effect on the movement of the front sight with respect to the rear sight due to the lever effect of the longer barrel amplifying even the slightest movement. This doesn't automatically make rifles more accurate than handguns, rather it provides the shooter with a finer degree of granularity of aim feedback so that the shooter can be more accurate.

The smallest target you should aim for should be the largest size of the grouping you are able to produce with any given firearm. Ie: if you can make a 6" circle with a handgun at a given range, then your sight picture on an assailant at that range should include a mentally projected spotlight image of that 6" circle on center of mass of the target, centered about the point of aim (pretend in your mind you have a laser pointer making a 6" diameter circle that moves with your aim point) ie: your line of fire is a cone, not a straight line.
 

Injury

Lifer
Jul 19, 2004
13,066
2
81
Originally posted by: giantpinkbunnyhead
Originally posted by: ValkyrieofHouston
Ok, sure... but what about those peeps who have large amount of illicit drugs running through their veins and aren't phased much by bullets cause there bodies don't feel anything? Or someone who is psychotic or dellusional? Just curious about that. I personally would rather feel confident in knowing that one shot is going to knock them on their *ss.

That's pretty much my take. Granted, a .22 might do an acceptable job... but whatever deterrent one claims the .22 has, can be done more effectively with a .44 for example. Is a .22 loud enough to scare the perp? Maybe. A .44? Definitely. One hit kills with a .22? there's a chance. One hit kills with a .44? Bigger chance. I dont know about you guys, but if it came down to my life, I want as many certainties on my side as I can get. "anything you can do, I can do better!" says the .44 to the .22. So... the .22 may be adequate... but when my life is on the line, I want more of a guarantee. Screw the .22. I want the attacker stopped or dead. Now. With the best chance of it happening at my disposal.

Well certainly a bigger gun is better, but my point, and the topic of the original post is not "which is better" it's "is a .22 caliber even close to being adaquate for self defense use?" and my statement still stands that yeah, you can defend yourself just fine with it. That's all I'm saying.
 

bloodugly

Golden Member
Apr 27, 2004
1,187
0
0
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: bloodugly
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: bloodugly
If you're not a great shot, just get a shotgun...pretty damn hard to miss. Its not small, but its effective. Just don't use some weak birdshot in it. I've unfortunately had to rid our ranch of some animal pests ( I seriously hate killing animals), and at 10 yards you can easily take the head pretty much off an animal with one. Immediate and painless death is the way to go if you have to put something down.

You've obviously never fired a shotgun at close range before. Love how people keep saying you cant miss with a shotgun...

Whats really funny is the birdshot load that you are least likely to miss with is the one you are saying not to use!

With my Mossberg 590 20" 12ga with 9 pellet 00 tactical loads all 9 .30 cal pellets strike within a 4" circle at 10 yards. Aim and shot placement are just as essential with a shotgun as any other weapon, more so when you have more than 1 projectile to be accountable for with every shot.

Birdshot just doesn't have enough stopping power at any kind of distance for me to consider it adequate if the desire is pretty much quick death to a human target. I'm not saying it won't totally screw someone up and quite possibly kill them, but 00 buck will have much more of an impact and more likely cause the attacker to go down immediately...especially if they're hopped up on crank or something and can take an abnormally high amount of abuse and fire back. A 4-6 inch spread (depending on the barrel) across a room is certainly alot more spread than you'll get with a single bullet, making it much harder to miss....not impossible, but pretty damn hard if you ever practice much at all. I've used a shotgun plenty up close, and I've never had a problem with missing, even at night on moving targets. If someone is trying to kill me, I'm not really concerned about being accountable for every projectile, so long as the ones that hit him take him out. I could always get new drywall done or buy a new TV. However, in a apartment with neighbors right on the other side of a possibly thin wall, birdshot would be a better choice, just for safety's sake.

I agree birdshot isn't ideal for defense. I was just pointing out the irony that the shotgun load most likely to magically not miss is the one that isn't even that good for defense.

Another thing to consider, is that the 4-6" spread you accept with a shotgun across a room is also a typical size defense grouping when rapid firing a short barreled handgun across that same room. Fire a handgun rapidly at a target 10 yards away and your shots should produce pretty much the same grouping pattern as the shotgun with 00 buck. Even with a single shot from the handgun and allowing for random deviation, the shot from the handgun WILL fall in the same circle as the shotgun grouping.

As far as I?m concerned, that?s the same percentage to hit the target. Of course 9 rounds are delivered at once with the shotgun... I?m not disputing the power of a shotgun with 00 buck, I'm only comparing accuracy and pointing out that the 'you can't miss' claim with shotguns is false. As I've demonstrated above, aiming at the same spot, the single shot from a handgun will lie in the same grouping with a single shot of 00 buck; ie: same chance of that 4-6" circle as a whole either hitting or missing. I won't consider 'what if the circle is half on half off on the edge of the target' scenarios because you should be aiming center of mass, and if it was simply a difficult shot that missed its mark, a grazing shot with a shotgun mandates a follow up shot just as much as a total miss with a handgun.

However, the primary accuracy advantage of the shotgun isn't unique to the shotgun, it applies to all long arms: larger sight radius due to the longer barrel provides better visual feedback with respect to movement, shaking, etc. The movement of a longer barrel will have a more pronounced effect on the movement of the front sight with respect to the rear sight due to the lever effect of the longer barrel amplifying even the slightest movement. This doesn't automatically make rifles more accurate than handguns, rather it provides the shooter with a finer degree of granularity of aim feedback so that the shooter can be more accurate.

The smallest target you should aim for should be the largest size of the grouping you are able to produce with any given firearm. Ie: if you can make a 6" circle with a handgun at a given range, then your sight picture on an assailant at that range should include a mentally projected spotlight image of that 6" circle on center of mass of the target, centered about the point of aim (pretend in your mind you have a laser pointer making a 6" diameter circle that moves with your aim point) ie: your line of fire is a cone, not a straight line.

Most average people that would have a handgun for just home defense will not group rapid fire pistol shots that closely, especially if they're scared and excited. That takes some bit of practice and being comfortable with your weapon. I think we can both agree that if someone has any kind of gun, they should know what to expect from it and actually practice with it regularly.

 

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
Originally posted by: bloodugly
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: bloodugly
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: bloodugly
If you're not a great shot, just get a shotgun...pretty damn hard to miss. Its not small, but its effective. Just don't use some weak birdshot in it. I've unfortunately had to rid our ranch of some animal pests ( I seriously hate killing animals), and at 10 yards you can easily take the head pretty much off an animal with one. Immediate and painless death is the way to go if you have to put something down.

You've obviously never fired a shotgun at close range before. Love how people keep saying you cant miss with a shotgun...

Whats really funny is the birdshot load that you are least likely to miss with is the one you are saying not to use!

With my Mossberg 590 20" 12ga with 9 pellet 00 tactical loads all 9 .30 cal pellets strike within a 4" circle at 10 yards. Aim and shot placement are just as essential with a shotgun as any other weapon, more so when you have more than 1 projectile to be accountable for with every shot.

Birdshot just doesn't have enough stopping power at any kind of distance for me to consider it adequate if the desire is pretty much quick death to a human target. I'm not saying it won't totally screw someone up and quite possibly kill them, but 00 buck will have much more of an impact and more likely cause the attacker to go down immediately...especially if they're hopped up on crank or something and can take an abnormally high amount of abuse and fire back. A 4-6 inch spread (depending on the barrel) across a room is certainly alot more spread than you'll get with a single bullet, making it much harder to miss....not impossible, but pretty damn hard if you ever practice much at all. I've used a shotgun plenty up close, and I've never had a problem with missing, even at night on moving targets. If someone is trying to kill me, I'm not really concerned about being accountable for every projectile, so long as the ones that hit him take him out. I could always get new drywall done or buy a new TV. However, in a apartment with neighbors right on the other side of a possibly thin wall, birdshot would be a better choice, just for safety's sake.

I agree birdshot isn't ideal for defense. I was just pointing out the irony that the shotgun load most likely to magically not miss is the one that isn't even that good for defense.

Another thing to consider, is that the 4-6" spread you accept with a shotgun across a room is also a typical size defense grouping when rapid firing a short barreled handgun across that same room. Fire a handgun rapidly at a target 10 yards away and your shots should produce pretty much the same grouping pattern as the shotgun with 00 buck. Even with a single shot from the handgun and allowing for random deviation, the shot from the handgun WILL fall in the same circle as the shotgun grouping.

As far as I?m concerned, that?s the same percentage to hit the target. Of course 9 rounds are delivered at once with the shotgun... I?m not disputing the power of a shotgun with 00 buck, I'm only comparing accuracy and pointing out that the 'you can't miss' claim with shotguns is false. As I've demonstrated above, aiming at the same spot, the single shot from a handgun will lie in the same grouping with a single shot of 00 buck; ie: same chance of that 4-6" circle as a whole either hitting or missing. I won't consider 'what if the circle is half on half off on the edge of the target' scenarios because you should be aiming center of mass, and if it was simply a difficult shot that missed its mark, a grazing shot with a shotgun mandates a follow up shot just as much as a total miss with a handgun.

However, the primary accuracy advantage of the shotgun isn't unique to the shotgun, it applies to all long arms: larger sight radius due to the longer barrel provides better visual feedback with respect to movement, shaking, etc. The movement of a longer barrel will have a more pronounced effect on the movement of the front sight with respect to the rear sight due to the lever effect of the longer barrel amplifying even the slightest movement. This doesn't automatically make rifles more accurate than handguns, rather it provides the shooter with a finer degree of granularity of aim feedback so that the shooter can be more accurate.

The smallest target you should aim for should be the largest size of the grouping you are able to produce with any given firearm. Ie: if you can make a 6" circle with a handgun at a given range, then your sight picture on an assailant at that range should include a mentally projected spotlight image of that 6" circle on center of mass of the target, centered about the point of aim (pretend in your mind you have a laser pointer making a 6" diameter circle that moves with your aim point) ie: your line of fire is a cone, not a straight line.

Most average people that would have a handgun for just home defense will not group rapid fire pistol shots that closely, especially if they're scared and excited. That takes some bit of practice and being comfortable with your weapon. I think we can both agree that if someone has any kind of gun, they should know what to expect from it and actually practice with it regularly.

It was a given that anyone with a handgun should be proficient in its use. :D Anyone who owns a handgun and cannot keep multiple rounds in a 6" circle at any range from 5 to 10 yards* after modest practice should probably choose another weapon before they hurt someone. A gun is a tool, and like any tool, it requires proficiency of the user to do its job.

* Anyone keeping a loaded handgun in a home for defense should be able to hit the inside flat part of a paper plate consistently from across any room in the house without effort after modest practice. This is not hard for anybody to do who practices and takes their firearm seriously (not just oh I bought a gun I'm safe now)

If you really don't want to miss, you could always chamber a low pressure tactical 12ga round in one of those flare pistols... :Q
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Originally posted by: Injury
BULL.

How many times have you been shot and how many times has it been by a .22?

K, you got as much experience as me then. so stop trying to act like a stereotyping badass you monkey-looking douche.

You act like a .22 and a BB gun have about the same effect.

Just because it's not a definate one shot take-down doesn't mean someone isn't going to be the least bit phased by it. You're just plain retarded if you don't think it would hurt at all. Hell, why not volunteer to get shot with a .22 and prove it? You're apparently all that is man, go for it!

I have been shot with both a BB gun and .22. I'd take another shot to the hand with a .22 for enough cash if I had a guaranteed non-bone/nerve/tendon hit that would cripple it. Take a look a .22 ahots...most here should be able to handle a metal straw that size rammed through a non-vital area if they had too.

seems though you seem to think everyone has the same life as yourself and that no one online can possibly venture off the safe trail.

You should do some 'research' into those that have actually been hit by different ammo types...a .22 can easily be a non-event other than some pain and bleeding. It's all relative. I have had a cluster of several nails go right through my foot that was more mentally freaking me out that any real major pain...then another time just stepped on one directly to my heel that I almost passed out from the pain.

The worst pain I have had has been getting my tongue sewn back on (actually the process they needed to do to numb the area) and another time I burst myself into flames and put a 3/4-1" deep x about 1" wide crater in my leg when a high-powered model rocket engine I was experimenting with flew direcly into me.

I am not getting what you don't understand about stopping power and killing power though...almost any weapon can kill...The thing with the hotter/larger calibers is even a critical miss can still do a major shock to the system even if it passes clean through.

This is a really bad place for gun discussions as just owning a gun or having fired one seems to make many think they are the next 2pac or Scarface or Robocop. That the same discussion to a gun forum and things will be different.

It's like the fat kid that weighs 260lbs thinking he can take out a 180lb weightlifting martial artist because once he gets his hands on them, they couldn't possibly do anything but give up as he locks them in a sleeper hold or figure 4....




 

jlee

Lifer
Sep 12, 2001
48,518
223
106
This is a really bad place for gun discussions as just owning a gun or having fired one seems to make many think they are the next 2pac or Scarface or Robocop

I seem to find the opposite being true -- those with less firearm experience seem to be saying that a .22 is all one would need. Unless I've missed something..?
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Originally posted by: bloodugly

Most average people that would have a handgun for just home defense will not group rapid fire pistol shots that closely, especially if they're scared and excited. That takes some bit of practice and being comfortable with your weapon. I think we can both agree that if someone has any kind of gun, they should know what to expect from it and actually practice with it regularly.

Most experienced either. Hitting a moving and usually in the dark target while yourself are surprised and also in the dark is pretty hard.

This was one of the big deals about the Columbine killings...how two kids could hit so accurately.

Almost anyone can get 'marksman' from a set up shot while prone. Getting it while you and your target are moving is another story.