It actually is the anti-doping agencies job to police recreational drug use. I dont want some 2bit criminal representing America on the world stage.
Is this a serious reply?
It actually is the anti-doping agencies job to police recreational drug use. I dont want some 2bit criminal representing America on the world stage.
The fifty-five year history of hippie dancing informs the opinion that MJ does not make one a better dancer.I don't know about MJ, but beer makes you a much better dancer...
It actually is the anti-doping agencies job to police recreational drug use. I dont want some 2bit criminal representing America on the world stage.
Dont go looking for logic where there is none son.I would seriously like to know how you got from A to B on this one?
Catlin and Murray[98] indicated that cannabis could be performance enhancing in sports that require greater concentration. Iven[99] noted that athletes use cannabis for relief of anxiety and stress, and perhaps to reduce muscle spasm. Saugy et al.[81] suggested that athletes were mainly motivated to use cannabis due to its effects on relaxation and well-being, promoting better sleep.
I know I won't get an answer, they never do. But this one is a SERIOUS LEAP from point A to point B, and I am wondering how that is reconciled.I mean in terms of democracy it
Dont go looking for logic where there is none son.
The use of the recreational drug in question was legal, therefore criminality not found.It actually is the anti-doping agencies job to police recreational drug use. I dont want some 2bit criminal representing America on the world stage.
So where does 2bit criminal come from????The use of the recreational drug in question was legal, therefore criminality not found.
I would seriously like to know how you got from A to B on this one?
Starting to think Matt and Someone are one and the same.Dope is dope. It doesn't need the make sense
It is not legal. Federal laws matter
Obviously you aren't interested in honest discussion of the thread topic (nor have you ever been), or addressing the valid points and/or questions posited by others.It is not legal. Federal laws matter
Thought States Rights mattered more.It is not legal. Federal laws matter
Obviously you aren't interested in honest discussion of the thread topic (nor have you ever been), or addressing the valid points and/or questions posited by others.
You came in here to shit the thread with your idiocy. Fuck off.
I would seriously like to know how you got from A to B on this one?
So WHAT makes them a, and I quote, 2bit criminal?Olympic athletes are more than just athletes. They represent their country on the world stage.
Nah, they’re just props for advertising.Olympic athletes are more than just athletes. They represent their country on the world stage.
Why do you hate corporate America? Oh wait, they are transnational now, nvm...Nah, they’re just props for advertising.
Surely you realize these two bit criminals are handling your money and shepherding your legal affairs, right?It actually is the anti-doping agencies job to police recreational drug use. I dont want some 2bit criminal representing America on the world stage.
Aren't those the four bit criminals? We could just refer to them as nibble criminals; or just nibblesSurely you realize these two bit criminals are handling your money and shepherding your legal affairs, right?
"Small govt conservative" demands that a federal nanny-state law supersede state law.It is not legal. Federal laws matter