MagnusTheBrewer
IN MEMORIAM
- Jun 19, 2004
- 24,122
- 1,594
- 126
Originally posted by: waggy
[
only time it matters is going out for dinner. gotta change where we go depending who i go out with heh
I'll go anywhere you're buying waggy
Originally posted by: waggy
[
only time it matters is going out for dinner. gotta change where we go depending who i go out with heh
Originally posted by: MagnusTheBrewer
Originally posted by: waggy
[
only time it matters is going out for dinner. gotta change where we go depending who i go out with heh
I'll go anywhere you're buying waggy![]()
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: Special K
For every successful entrepreneur are probably thousands who put everything they had into their companies and didn't see a fraction of the success that people like Bill Gates did
or look at someone like Richard Stallman, brilliant computer geek & hacker who practically founded the free software movement. He thinks it is a human rights violation to charge for software. Imagine if Richard Stallman had been a selfish pr1ck like Bill Gates, instead of creating the GPL and the GNU tools, he might have spent his life trying to overcharge suckers for emacs or other software or spent his life like Bill Gates stealing ideas and software from other people and remarketing it at outrageous prices. I believe that 50 years from now, the influence of Bill Gates will be forgotten, but the influence of Richard Stallman will live on through open source and free software which is rapidly becoming the accepted standard in business and is already the accepted standard in the sciences. Assessing people's worth to society by their pay check is just an incredibly stupid thing.
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Reports by the census bureau indicate that the gap between the super rich and the well-off is increasing every year.
This doesn't bother me though, and it shouldn't bother you either, since you and I are well off. I can afford an okay apartment with an okay TV and a nice computer. I can afford to eat well. I can afford to do what I want to do for work. That's enough for me. I can't buy a yacht, so what?
Originally posted by: uberman
There is no more middle class. We are simply a country of haves and have-nots, the rich and the poor.
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: uberman
There is no more middle class. We are simply a country of haves and have-nots, the rich and the poor.
Which one are you?
Originally posted by: uberman
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: uberman
There is no more middle class. We are simply a country of haves and have-nots, the rich and the poor.
Which one are you?
Definitely the have-nots or the poor.
Originally posted by: EKKC
all i have to say is, if you're getting a year end bonus more than the lotto jackpot is worth. that's just wrong.
companies should get a grip on how to hire executives and rework all compensation packages for them.
NK has nuclear weapons. Iran does not have nuclear weapons.Originally posted by: uberman
There is no more middle class. We are simply a country of haves and have-nots, the rich and the poor.
Originally posted by: Darkstar757
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: MagnusTheBrewer
The '50's era was indeed the "cookie cutter cheaply built tract home.," which is why I comapared it to "the super cheap, 2 x 4 constructed, drive by type of house"
The tract homes were subsidized by Uncle Sam and our house was purchased in 1960 for $10,000 which was my Dad's salary at the time. Also, in those years, only the head (read man) of the household worked outside the home typically so there really was no combined income.
I was trying to eliminate the quibling over what constitutes 'middle class' by making comparisons to living situations that hopefully many can identify with. I define 'working poor' as someone who does not own 'real' property and is within 2 paychecks of being on the street. Again, in my state, the 'working poor' are in the vast majority.
In general, quality of life has dropped significantly across the country within ONE generation. I believe the 'middle' class has gone the way of single wage earner families, i.e. none to speak of.
I disagree. Quality of life has greatly improved.
BTW, your father's salary was $64,000 in today's dollars. He made TWICE the average income in 1960, which was around $5000
Oh, and my parents paid $32,000 for a 2400 SF suburban house in 1962.
BTW, I will agree that 2 income families have caused housing prices to shoot up. But that's only because they were willing to pay more. The market will charge only what the market will bear. 2 incomes means the market will bear more.
So, in a way, you can blame women's lib for some of that.
But MANY things are far cheaper now as a % of income. Food is FAR cheaper (DRASTICALLY CHEAPER), appliances are cheaper, and so are cars. Not to mention all the gadgets the average person has now that they never had then.
For all the energy you are putting into this I take it your super rich.
:roll:
Originally posted by: blackllotus
Originally posted by: Amused
Wealth is distributed by EARNING it. If you want it, go earn it. No one is going to give it to you because you're jealous of them.
So I take it you aren't earning 50 million dollars because you don't work hard enough right?
I don't think risk has much of a factor. Its about who you know that will get you the farthest.Originally posted by: Amused
Hard work is not enough. Never has been, never will be. You need ambition and risk. You will never be wealthy, no matter how hard you work, if you simply stay in the same job for the security of a paycheck.Originally posted by: blackllotus
So I take it you aren't earning 50 million dollars because you don't work hard enough right?Originally posted by: Amused
Wealth is distributed by EARNING it. If you want it, go earn it. No one is going to give it to you because you're jealous of them.
Originally posted by: her209
I don't think risk has much of a factor. Its about who you know that will get you the farthest.Originally posted by: Amused
Hard work is not enough. Never has been, never will be. You need ambition and risk. You will never be wealthy, no matter how hard you work, if you simply stay in the same job for the security of a paycheck.Originally posted by: blackllotus
So I take it you aren't earning 50 million dollars because you don't work hard enough right?Originally posted by: Amused
Wealth is distributed by EARNING it. If you want it, go earn it. No one is going to give it to you because you're jealous of them.
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: aidanjm
no, it isn't communism, it is a progressive taxation policy (which American already has, anyway). it makes sense to tax the wealthiest citizens at the highest rates. the majority of people accept this. George Bush has simply tweaked the balance, causing huge amounts of money to shift from the pockets of the middle class to the pockets of the mega-wealthy.
Of FFS, not this crap again. Go google or something because it simply isn't true. The middle class pays next to nothing in taxes. The poor pay NO TAXES WHATSOEVER
It's the same old crap that been spewn over and over again by people that won't better their life or themselves. "But the rich don't pay taxes!!!! They're sticking it to the little man!!!"
Do you know that I will pay over 50K in taxes this year? And I ain't rich.
