Is it just me or does it seem like the Middle Class is Dying?

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Can somebody tell me what exactly defines middle class and why they think it is dead/dying?

I'd like to see a nailed down definition of what is considered middle class. And how exactly you determine that it is dying?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_class

This does a pretty good job of it.

Thanks. But I was kind of hoping to get an anecdotal definition from some of those championing the idea that the middle class is dead.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,402
8,574
126
Originally posted by: aidanjm
people think the defining element of Dumbya's presidency is the Iraq war, but actually it was the sneaky tax cuts for the rich and other financial policies that have resulted in a massive shift in the balance of wealth away from the middle class and towards the "mega" wealthy. Compare the Clinton presidency with Bush's Presidency. Under Clinton, the middle class became more wealthy every year. Under Bush, the middle class has become less wealthy with each passing year. Government policy does make a huge difference re: where the money flows to.

that has more to due with the 2 billion more workers available with the opening of china and india to service industries than government policies. but hey, don't let reality get in the way of your politics.
 

JACKHAMMER

Platinum Member
Oct 9, 1999
2,870
0
76
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: aidanjm
no, it isn't communism, it is a progressive taxation policy (which American already has, anyway). it makes sense to tax the wealthiest citizens at the highest rates. the majority of people accept this. George Bush has simply tweaked the balance, causing huge amounts of money to shift from the pockets of the middle class to the pockets of the mega-wealthy.

Of FFS, not this crap again. Go google or something because it simply isn't true. The middle class pays next to nothing in taxes. The poor pay NO TAXES WHATSOEVER

It's the same old crap that been spewn over and over again by people that won't better their life or themselves. "But the rich don't pay taxes!!!! They're sticking it to the little man!!!"

Do you know that I will pay over 50K in taxes this year? And I ain't rich.


Not that I want to get in this conversation, but it is a fact the traditional middle class is shrinking. But, I had to respond to this - Sorry pal, but if you pay 50K in taxes you arfe making in excess of over $120K/year. While that isn't super rich, that is certainly upper class.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: JACKHAMMER
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: aidanjm
no, it isn't communism, it is a progressive taxation policy (which American already has, anyway). it makes sense to tax the wealthiest citizens at the highest rates. the majority of people accept this. George Bush has simply tweaked the balance, causing huge amounts of money to shift from the pockets of the middle class to the pockets of the mega-wealthy.

Of FFS, not this crap again. Go google or something because it simply isn't true. The middle class pays next to nothing in taxes. The poor pay NO TAXES WHATSOEVER

It's the same old crap that been spewn over and over again by people that won't better their life or themselves. "But the rich don't pay taxes!!!! They're sticking it to the little man!!!"

Do you know that I will pay over 50K in taxes this year? And I ain't rich.


Not that I want to get in this conversation, but it is a fact the traditional middle class is shrinking. But, I had to respond to this - Sorry pal, but if you pay 50K in taxes you arfe making in excess of over $120K/year. While that isn't super rich, that is certainly upper class.
120k is not uppe class. i would put that in more upper part of middle class.


in some areas 120k is not a lot. in others it is. where i live 120k is a darn good income.
 

ranmaniac

Golden Member
May 14, 2001
1,940
0
76
I guess I'm upper-middle class, but I know that my parents worked very hard to achieve it. My dad has a bachelors, masters, and PhD in Chemical Engineering, and one of the top experts in his field. He immigrated to this country on a scholarship, and strived to be in the top 1% of everything he did.

While most people will not be "super rich" I do think they have higher probability of achieving success if they are given the opportunity to pursue higher education.
 

IEC

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Jun 10, 2004
14,604
6,091
136
Get out of DC. Go to a small city of 100K-200K and the suburbs there will show you your "dying" middle class ;)
 

ranmaniac

Golden Member
May 14, 2001
1,940
0
76
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: ranmaniac
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: Darkstar757
I know this is a rant. But as of late I swear I see the divide between the rich and the poor is huge. I am so sick of seeing reports of CEO's getting a Christmas bonus of 53million. I work hard all year round and the goverenment is taxing the fscking crap out of me. The rich just setup companies and play the crooked good ole boy game. I just feel like the American concept of the Middle Class is dying at a crazy pace.


Im soooo pissed.

:|

Why are you pissed?

If you never read the news you'd never know about those people, would you?

And again, why are you pissed? Seriously ask yourself that. Don't just become defensive. Honestly ask yourself why you are so worried about others that what you READ about them doing results in such a strong emotional response from you.

And no, the Middle class is far from dying.

You clearly have your head in the sand if you think the gap between rich and poor hasn't widened. Denial is usually the first excuse a person makes when confronted with reality.

who cares if the "rich" get more rich? as long as the rest of us have a better standard of living, why should you care? What's the difference if you made $100k one year, then $105k the next, and that billionaire went from $1 billion to $3 billion? WTF is the difference? WHO CARES if there is a huge gap? Standard of living is 100x better than 10-20-30-40-150 years ago for all of us. The "poor" today live like kings compared to people 100 years ago in the US. Heck compare to 3rd world countries.

This is why people in 3rd world countries are dying and Socialist Europeans are suffering. Soviet Russia FELL. The great COMMUNIST PET PROJECT FAILED. GET OVER IT.

WTF does communism have to do with the Middle Class dying? Try staying on topic if you want to argue seriously.
 

child of wonder

Diamond Member
Aug 31, 2006
8,307
176
106
I live in Sioux Falls, SD, which is a town of about 150,000 people. Most are middle class here, but in the 15 years I've lived in this area I can see the middle class shrinking a bit in this area.

Personally, I'm middle class. I'm also a Linux Admin and make a little more than the OP but that also includes a little consulting on the side. Including my wife's income, we make about $72,000 year. For our small family of 4 that means we can afford a brand new $160,000 house (1800 sq. ft, 4 bed, 2 bath), two average cars (2001 ZX2, 2000 Taurus), and we manage to have almost $600 per month left for savings (though we need to increase our 401k from 6% to 10% or higher). However, like most of the country, we're one major financial disaster away from bankruptcy (at least until we get more money saved up).

The middle class is shrinking, but the problem is where those middle class people are going and I fear far too many are falling rather than rising.

Everyone needs to earn their own way and create their own success but a $53 million bonus is silly. There are so many people that are without basic needs through no fault of their own, especially children born into poverty.

Unfortunately, life is rarely fair. However, were I rich, I wouldn't let a day go by that I didn't dramatically improve someone's quality of life through generous, spontaneous cash donations (such as a Wal-Mart worker I saw the other day -- clean cut, 40s, and had his son at work with him helping stock shelves. I told my wife I would've loved to be rich to help him get back on his feet and into a better job).
 

40sTheme

Golden Member
Sep 24, 2006
1,607
0
0
I'm middle class and i'm sure as hell not complaining. I couldn't ask for a better life, seriously.
 

HombrePequeno

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2001
4,657
0
0
Originally posted by: ranmaniac
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: ranmaniac
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: Darkstar757
I know this is a rant. But as of late I swear I see the divide between the rich and the poor is huge. I am so sick of seeing reports of CEO's getting a Christmas bonus of 53million. I work hard all year round and the goverenment is taxing the fscking crap out of me. The rich just setup companies and play the crooked good ole boy game. I just feel like the American concept of the Middle Class is dying at a crazy pace.


Im soooo pissed.

:|

Why are you pissed?

If you never read the news you'd never know about those people, would you?

And again, why are you pissed? Seriously ask yourself that. Don't just become defensive. Honestly ask yourself why you are so worried about others that what you READ about them doing results in such a strong emotional response from you.

And no, the Middle class is far from dying.

You clearly have your head in the sand if you think the gap between rich and poor hasn't widened. Denial is usually the first excuse a person makes when confronted with reality.

who cares if the "rich" get more rich? as long as the rest of us have a better standard of living, why should you care? What's the difference if you made $100k one year, then $105k the next, and that billionaire went from $1 billion to $3 billion? WTF is the difference? WHO CARES if there is a huge gap? Standard of living is 100x better than 10-20-30-40-150 years ago for all of us. The "poor" today live like kings compared to people 100 years ago in the US. Heck compare to 3rd world countries.

This is why people in 3rd world countries are dying and Socialist Europeans are suffering. Soviet Russia FELL. The great COMMUNIST PET PROJECT FAILED. GET OVER IT.

WTF does communism have to do with the Middle Class dying? Try staying on topic if you want to argue seriously.

Generally the only way to fix wealth inequality is via wealth redistribution. The obvious extreme of that was communism which was the near complete elimination of wealth inequality. The only problem is that doesn't help the poor very much, it just hurts the more well off. You can see this in quite a few European countries where their poor are just as poor as ours but our rich are far richer.
 

JACKHAMMER

Platinum Member
Oct 9, 1999
2,870
0
76
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: JACKHAMMER
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: aidanjm
no, it isn't communism, it is a progressive taxation policy (which American already has, anyway). it makes sense to tax the wealthiest citizens at the highest rates. the majority of people accept this. George Bush has simply tweaked the balance, causing huge amounts of money to shift from the pockets of the middle class to the pockets of the mega-wealthy.

Of FFS, not this crap again. Go google or something because it simply isn't true. The middle class pays next to nothing in taxes. The poor pay NO TAXES WHATSOEVER

It's the same old crap that been spewn over and over again by people that won't better their life or themselves. "But the rich don't pay taxes!!!! They're sticking it to the little man!!!"

Do you know that I will pay over 50K in taxes this year? And I ain't rich.


Not that I want to get in this conversation, but it is a fact the traditional middle class is shrinking. But, I had to respond to this - Sorry pal, but if you pay 50K in taxes you arfe making in excess of over $120K/year. While that isn't super rich, that is certainly upper class.
120k is not uppe class. i would put that in more upper part of middle class.


in some areas 120k is not a lot. in others it is. where i live 120k is a darn good income.

I really don't care if you think a six figure salary is not a lot, according to wiki when you approach 200k you are indeed upper class. And my 120K was just an estimate, odds are he makes more than that. I do agree standard of living varies on local, but it just irritates me when some one who make that much and more doesn't consider themsleves, well off or rich. They aren't in touch with what a majority of America lives off of, which is less than half this guy makes.
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,330
126
Originally posted by: JACKHAMMER
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: JACKHAMMER
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: aidanjm
no, it isn't communism, it is a progressive taxation policy (which American already has, anyway). it makes sense to tax the wealthiest citizens at the highest rates. the majority of people accept this. George Bush has simply tweaked the balance, causing huge amounts of money to shift from the pockets of the middle class to the pockets of the mega-wealthy.

Of FFS, not this crap again. Go google or something because it simply isn't true. The middle class pays next to nothing in taxes. The poor pay NO TAXES WHATSOEVER

It's the same old crap that been spewn over and over again by people that won't better their life or themselves. "But the rich don't pay taxes!!!! They're sticking it to the little man!!!"

Do you know that I will pay over 50K in taxes this year? And I ain't rich.


Not that I want to get in this conversation, but it is a fact the traditional middle class is shrinking. But, I had to respond to this - Sorry pal, but if you pay 50K in taxes you arfe making in excess of over $120K/year. While that isn't super rich, that is certainly upper class.
120k is not uppe class. i would put that in more upper part of middle class.


in some areas 120k is not a lot. in others it is. where i live 120k is a darn good income.

I really don't care if you think a six figure salary is not a lot, according to wiki when you approach 200k you are indeed upper class. And my 120K was just an estimate, odds are he makes more than that. I do agree standard of living varies on local, but it just irritates me when some one who make that much and more doesn't consider themsleves, well off or rich. They aren't in touch with what a majority of America lives off of, which is less than half this guy makes.

Thats just absurd. Regardless of what you might have read on ?wikki? there is no real arbitrary number that makes you ?rich?. A household making 120K a year is most definitely NOT rich. Depending on where he lives it would probably be mid-middle class. 120K a year is achievable by ANYONE who has the drive to get it.
 

JACKHAMMER

Platinum Member
Oct 9, 1999
2,870
0
76
Originally posted by: Darwin333
Originally posted by: JACKHAMMER
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: JACKHAMMER
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: aidanjm
no, it isn't communism, it is a progressive taxation policy (which American already has, anyway). it makes sense to tax the wealthiest citizens at the highest rates. the majority of people accept this. George Bush has simply tweaked the balance, causing huge amounts of money to shift from the pockets of the middle class to the pockets of the mega-wealthy.

Of FFS, not this crap again. Go google or something because it simply isn't true. The middle class pays next to nothing in taxes. The poor pay NO TAXES WHATSOEVER

It's the same old crap that been spewn over and over again by people that won't better their life or themselves. "But the rich don't pay taxes!!!! They're sticking it to the little man!!!"

Do you know that I will pay over 50K in taxes this year? And I ain't rich.


Not that I want to get in this conversation, but it is a fact the traditional middle class is shrinking. But, I had to respond to this - Sorry pal, but if you pay 50K in taxes you arfe making in excess of over $120K/year. While that isn't super rich, that is certainly upper class.
120k is not uppe class. i would put that in more upper part of middle class.


in some areas 120k is not a lot. in others it is. where i live 120k is a darn good income.

I really don't care if you think a six figure salary is not a lot, according to wiki when you approach 200k you are indeed upper class. And my 120K was just an estimate, odds are he makes more than that. I do agree standard of living varies on local, but it just irritates me when some one who make that much and more doesn't consider themsleves, well off or rich. They aren't in touch with what a majority of America lives off of, which is less than half this guy makes.

Thats just absurd. Regardless of what you might have read on ?wikki? there is no real arbitrary number that makes you ?rich?. A household making 120K a year is most definitely NOT rich. Depending on where he lives it would probably be mid-middle class. 120K a year is achievable by ANYONE who has the drive to get it.



This statement is just pure ignorance, and clearly not backed by any type of data. The ignorance amazes me, you are telling me the only reason everyone doesn't make $120k/yr is that they don't have the drive to get it?? You seriously must be one sheltered person because you are clearly out of touch w/ reality. And I live just outside of Chicago, i one of the richest countys in the country and 120k is anything but "mid-middle" class. The median income in this country for a 5 person household is just around 51K - that must be b/c everyone doesn't have the "drive" to do better for themselves. My guess would be you grew or are growing (as your narrow minded opinion suggests) up in a upper middle class area and school where you take all the opportunities that you have for granted. Not everyone has those types of things within their reach. Asshat.
 

mercanucaribe

Banned
Oct 20, 2004
9,763
1
0
http://www.ntu.org/main/page.php?PageID=6

Top 1% $328,049
Top 5% $137,056
Top 10% $99,112
Top 25% $60,041
Top 50% $30,122
Bottom 50% <$30,122

You're a moron if you say $120k is middle class, which says a lot about what it takes to make that kind of money. That puts you well into the top 10%, and 17k more would put you in the top 5%. That is what you call rich.

If 120k and 200k is not upper class, what the hell is?
 

AnyMal

Lifer
Nov 21, 2001
15,780
0
76
Originally posted by: Darkstar757
I know this is a rant. But as of late I swear I see the divide between the rich and the poor is huge. I am so sick of seeing reports of CEO's getting a Christmas bonus of 53million. I work hard all year round and the goverenment is taxing the fscking crap out of me. The rich just setup companies and play the crooked good ole boy game. I just feel like the American concept of the Middle Class is dying at a crazy pace.


Im soooo pissed.

:|

Why are you pissed? Do you think those CEO's were born into their positions? What's stopping you from setting the bar high and aim for the top spot?

Have you ever read any of those people's biographies? Many of the come from very poor environment and became who they are today through hard work and dedication.
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,330
126
Originally posted by: JACKHAMMER
Originally posted by: Darwin333
Originally posted by: JACKHAMMER
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: JACKHAMMER
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: aidanjm
no, it isn't communism, it is a progressive taxation policy (which American already has, anyway). it makes sense to tax the wealthiest citizens at the highest rates. the majority of people accept this. George Bush has simply tweaked the balance, causing huge amounts of money to shift from the pockets of the middle class to the pockets of the mega-wealthy.

Of FFS, not this crap again. Go google or something because it simply isn't true. The middle class pays next to nothing in taxes. The poor pay NO TAXES WHATSOEVER

It's the same old crap that been spewn over and over again by people that won't better their life or themselves. "But the rich don't pay taxes!!!! They're sticking it to the little man!!!"

Do you know that I will pay over 50K in taxes this year? And I ain't rich.


Not that I want to get in this conversation, but it is a fact the traditional middle class is shrinking. But, I had to respond to this - Sorry pal, but if you pay 50K in taxes you arfe making in excess of over $120K/year. While that isn't super rich, that is certainly upper class.
120k is not uppe class. i would put that in more upper part of middle class.


in some areas 120k is not a lot. in others it is. where i live 120k is a darn good income.

I really don't care if you think a six figure salary is not a lot, according to wiki when you approach 200k you are indeed upper class. And my 120K was just an estimate, odds are he makes more than that. I do agree standard of living varies on local, but it just irritates me when some one who make that much and more doesn't consider themsleves, well off or rich. They aren't in touch with what a majority of America lives off of, which is less than half this guy makes.

Thats just absurd. Regardless of what you might have read on ?wikki? there is no real arbitrary number that makes you ?rich?. A household making 120K a year is most definitely NOT rich. Depending on where he lives it would probably be mid-middle class. 120K a year is achievable by ANYONE who has the drive to get it.



This statement is just pure ignorance, and clearly not backed by any type of data. The ignorance amazes me, you are telling me the only reason everyone doesn't make $120k/yr is that they don't have the drive to get it?? You seriously must be one sheltered person because you are clearly out of touch w/ reality. And I live just outside of Chicago, i one of the richest countys in the country and 120k is anything but "mid-middle" class. The median income in this country for a 5 person household is just around 51K - that must be b/c everyone doesn't have the "drive" to do better for themselves. My guess would be you grew or are growing (as your narrow minded opinion suggests) up in a upper middle class area and school where you take all the opportunities that you have for granted. Not everyone has those types of things within their reach. Asshat.


At the age of 19 I make 90K working as a roughneck on an oil rig with no formal education. My wife made 30K working in retail. That put our household income at 120K with two relatively un-educated workers. Now if I can do it then so can anyone else.

And I promise you, we are no where near rich. If you are unwilling to do that type of work to get ahead then that is your own problem. But the opportunities are defiantly out there. Perhaps if you get off the couch and look for them you might find some.
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,330
126
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
http://www.ntu.org/main/page.php?PageID=6

Top 1% $328,049
Top 5% $137,056
Top 10% $99,112
Top 25% $60,041
Top 50% $30,122
Bottom 50% <$30,122

You're a moron if you say $120k is middle class, which says a lot about what it takes to make that kind of money. That puts you well into the top 10%, and 17k more would put you in the top 5%. That is what you call rich.

If 120k and 200k is not upper class, what the hell is?

If you would have read my post i said a "HOUSEHOLD" income of 120K. That would be two earners making 60K each which by your numbers could be around 25% of the people (depending on the spouses income).
 

JACKHAMMER

Platinum Member
Oct 9, 1999
2,870
0
76
Originally posted by: Darwin333
Originally posted by: JACKHAMMER
Originally posted by: Darwin333
Originally posted by: JACKHAMMER
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: JACKHAMMER
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Perhaps if you get off the couch and look for them you might find some.

Just another example to show your arrogance. I make more sitting my ass on the couch than you do exposing yourself to all kinds of crap, but it isn't about what we make. The conversation is about what it mean to the AVERAGE AMERICAN and jobs where you can make that kind of money being uneducated are pretty rare (never mind more dangerous - I would never do that type of work, I value my life and family too much).

Ohh ... and perhaps your lack on education prohibits you from doing much math, but a household income of 120K (even by the link you quoted) puts you into the upper 25% WHICH by definition is NOT the middle!
 

bennylong

Platinum Member
Apr 20, 2006
2,493
0
0
$120k in NY or Northern or So. CA would be middle class, and you wouldn't be able to afford a decent house at $120k.
 

BlancoNino

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2005
5,695
0
0
Originally posted by: ranmaniac
WTF does communism have to do with the Middle Class dying? Try staying on topic if you want to argue seriously.

Socialism has a lot to do with our declining middle class. Socialist laws have allowed the rich to stay at that level while keeping anyone else from reaching their status.
 

Special K

Diamond Member
Jun 18, 2000
7,098
0
76
Originally posted by: AnyMal
Originally posted by: Darkstar757
I know this is a rant. But as of late I swear I see the divide between the rich and the poor is huge. I am so sick of seeing reports of CEO's getting a Christmas bonus of 53million. I work hard all year round and the goverenment is taxing the fscking crap out of me. The rich just setup companies and play the crooked good ole boy game. I just feel like the American concept of the Middle Class is dying at a crazy pace.


Im soooo pissed.

:|

Why are you pissed? Do you think those CEO's were born into their positions? What's stopping you from setting the bar high and aim for the top spot?

Have you ever read any of those people's biographies? Many of the come from very poor environment and became who they are today through hard work and dedication.

For every 1 who made it are thousands of others who tried just as hard and never got there. Don't discount the role that luck and natural ability has in these people's success.
 

ranmaniac

Golden Member
May 14, 2001
1,940
0
76
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: ranmaniac
WTF does communism have to do with the Middle Class dying? Try staying on topic if you want to argue seriously.

Socialism has a lot to do with our declining middle class. Socialist laws have allowed the rich to stay at that level while keeping anyone else from reaching their status.

Which "Socialist" laws?
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,455
19,923
146
Originally posted by: ranmaniac
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: ranmaniac
WTF does communism have to do with the Middle Class dying? Try staying on topic if you want to argue seriously.

Socialism has a lot to do with our declining middle class. Socialist laws have allowed the rich to stay at that level while keeping anyone else from reaching their status.

Which "Socialist" laws?

Sounds like BlancoNino has no idea what socialism is.